Why has the left cancelled Martin Luther King, Jr?

[BS Filter]

Why? After 50 years, do Conservatives still misinterpret MLKs statement?

MLK SUPPORTED Affirmative Action

How do conservatives misinterpret MLKs statement about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?

ConservatIves are somewhat simple creatures. They take everything literally

MLK wanted to level the playing field. He understood that declaring equality was a long way from achieving it.

So you're saying we shouldn't take MLK seriously when he said we should judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. You're a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

Racism is a character trait. Not all whites are racists. Those who continue practicing it are being judged by the content of their character.

Now given the amount of judging you white racists do about blacks here at USMB, maybe you should keep Dr. Kings name out of your motherfucking mouths.

You're not qualified to shine Dr. King's shoes.

 

[IM2]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Bullshit.

Rightwinger is right. King would have supported all those things.

 

[WelfareQueen]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

 

[San Souci]

Why? After 50 years, do Conservatives still misinterpret MLKs statement?

MLK SUPPORTED Affirmative Action

How do conservatives misinterpret MLKs statement about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?

ConservatIves are somewhat simple creatures. They take everything literally

MLK wanted to level the playing field. He understood that declaring equality was a long way from achieving it.

Since it doesn't exist ,what is the point? Whites are just inherently more intelligent.

You forgot the word "some" in front of the word "Whites". You are proof positive that my statement is true.

I was not taken out of context. The Black skull is half way between Human and Gorilla,

STFU you racist son-of a bitch! People like you should be horse-whipped for stupidity! Welcome to the allowed grounds of my "ignore list". About half of the residents are stupid racist motherfuckers like you and the others are liberals.

Temper ,Temper!

 

[IM2]

Why? After 50 years, do Conservatives still misinterpret MLKs statement?

MLK SUPPORTED Affirmative Action

How do conservatives misinterpret MLKs statement about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?

ConservatIves are somewhat simple creatures. They take everything literally

MLK wanted to level the playing field. He understood that declaring equality was a long way from achieving it.

So you're saying we shouldn't take MLK seriously when he said we should judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. You're a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

Racism is a character trait. Not all whites are racists. Those who continue practicing it are being judged by the content of their character.

Now given the amount of judging you white racists do about blacks here at USMB, maybe you should keep Dr. Kings name out of your motherfucking mouths.

You're not qualified to shine Dr. King's shoes.

I'm qualified to speak to what Kings true MESSAGES were. You only repeat one sentence. You miss this part:



So you just don't understand anything about King but one sentence racists use when people put pressure on white racists to end their bullshit.

 

[BS Filter]

Why? After 50 years, do Conservatives still misinterpret MLKs statement?

MLK SUPPORTED Affirmative Action

How do conservatives misinterpret MLKs statement about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?

ConservatIves are somewhat simple creatures. They take everything literally

MLK wanted to level the playing field. He understood that declaring equality was a long way from achieving it.

So you're saying we shouldn't take MLK seriously when he said we should judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. You're a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

Racism is a character trait. Not all whites are racists. Those who continue practicing it are being judged by the content of their character.

Now given the amount of judging you white racists do about blacks here at USMB, maybe you should keep Dr. Kings name out of your motherfucking mouths.

You're not qualified to shine Dr. King's shoes.

I'm qualified to speak to what Kings true MESSAGES were. You only repeat one sentence. You miss this part:



So you just don't understand anything about King but one sentence racists use when people put pressure on white racists to end their bullshit.

You're very ill.

 

[IM2]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

Out of 11,000 protests, 500 had violence. 65 percent of those violent interactions were started by police and white supremacists. They caught white supremacists setting fires and vandalizing property.

 

[IM2]

Why? After 50 years, do Conservatives still misinterpret MLKs statement?

MLK SUPPORTED Affirmative Action

How do conservatives misinterpret MLKs statement about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?

ConservatIves are somewhat simple creatures. They take everything literally

MLK wanted to level the playing field. He understood that declaring equality was a long way from achieving it.

So you're saying we shouldn't take MLK seriously when he said we should judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. You're a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

Racism is a character trait. Not all whites are racists. Those who continue practicing it are being judged by the content of their character.

Now given the amount of judging you white racists do about blacks here at USMB, maybe you should keep Dr. Kings name out of your motherfucking mouths.

You're not qualified to shine Dr. King's shoes.

I'm qualified to speak to what Kings true MESSAGES were. You only repeat one sentence. You miss this part:



So you just don't understand anything about King but one sentence racists use when people put pressure on white racists to end their bullshit.

You're very ill.

No, I am very correct. You have the illness.

 

[rightwinger]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Bullshit.

MLK saw enough George Floyd’s in his day
He would also be outraged at the erosion of voting rights that he fought so hard for

 

[rightwinger]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

 

[IM2]

 

[WelfareQueen]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

 

[rightwinger]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes

 

[BS Filter]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Bullshit.

MLK saw enough George Floyd’s in his day
He would also be outraged at the erosion of voting rights that he fought so hard for

Bullshit. You're spreading propaganda. Requiring an ID is not an erosion of voting rights.

 

[BS Filter]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes

So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?

 

[danielpalos]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes

So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?

Inequality and poverty?

 

[rightwinger]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Bullshit.

MLK saw enough George Floyd’s in his day
He would also be outraged at the erosion of voting rights that he fought so hard for

Bullshit. You're spreading propaganda. Requiring an ID is not an erosion of voting rights.

It is more than requiring ID. It is restricting mail in voting, it is forcing people into long lines and then threatening anyone offering them aid, it is giving partisan state officials the power to overturn local results.

 

[WelfareQueen]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes

So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?

Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team.

 

[WelfareQueen]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Bullshit.

MLK saw enough George Floyd’s in his day
He would also be outraged at the erosion of voting rights that he fought so hard for

Bullshit. You're spreading propaganda. Requiring an ID is not an erosion of voting rights.

It is more than requiring ID. It is restricting mail in voting, it is forcing people into long lines and then threatening anyone offering them aid, it is giving partisan state officials the power to overturn local results.

What complete and utter bullshit.

 

[BS Filter]

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud.

Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes

So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?

Inequality and poverty?

Nope.