Why has no one in the vast conspiracy that stole Trump's "Landslide!" in 2020 been identified or prosecuted?

[toobfreak]

You are the only criminal I know of.

ARE YOU ACCUSING ME OF BEING A CRIMINAL?

 

[jc456]

That is the best you can do? Weak, Very weak

Is it true or not?

 

[jc456]

You are the only criminal I know of. You have no clue what a evidentiary hearing is. The plaintiffs are required to produce evidence in their filing that a judge can look at. The judge is not here to function as a grand jury. The Trump lawyers provided absolutely no evidence of anything

They were never given the opportunity. So as usual, factually incorrect

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You are the only criminal I know of. You have no clue what a evidentiary hearing is. The plaintiffs are required to produce evidence in their filing that a judge can look at. The judge is not here to function as a grand jury. The Trump lawyers provided absolutely no evidence of anything

They were never given the opportunity. So as usual, factually incorrect

The most certainly were. Here is just one example. This one line in the article sums up every Trump court challenge. No evidence presented that merited action.
“This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits,” the judge wrote.

Trump loses election challenge lawsuit in Wisconsin, further cementing Biden win in presidential race

President Donald Trump and his allies keep losing court cases that challenge the victory by Joe Biden in the presidential election.

www.cnbc.com

 

[lennypartiv]

Are you saying Trump appointed liberal judges?

Trump did his best to appoint conservative judges. Occasionally some of them make weird decisions from the bench.

 

[schmidlap]

“This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits,” the judge wrote.

Frivolous challenges thrown out of court by dozens of judges - Republicans and even Trump-appointees included - only makes them complicit in the vast, incredibly clandestine, ever metastasizing conspiracy that deprived the Loser of his amazing "Landslide!" victory, after independent public surveys throughout his four years had, relentlessly and consistently, confirmed that most Americans thought he stank.

All those Republican governors, secretaries of state, attorney general, election commissioners, poll supervisors, bipartisan observers, vote tabulators, auditors, re-counters, etc., etc., etc., who pulled off the greatest hoax in American history masterminded, coordinated and executed their incredibly complex caper so deftly, that not one has been exposed despite all the fanatical Trumpies - prosecuting attorneys and investigative reporters included - who must have been driven by both their Trumpy fanaticism and subservience, as well as the irresistible attraction of such a monumental opportunity for the personal fame, glory, and riches that being the author of such a blockbuster exposé would bring.

And yet, all seem resigned to whining about their conspiracy, rather than actually nailing one or two of the conspirators.

 

[schmidlap]

Why are you still talking about Trump?

Because the Loser still insists he won an election in a "Landslide!" and yet not a single Trumpy investigative reporter or Trumpy prosecutor has developed a lead on even a single suspect in the greatest hoax in American history in which thousands would have had to collaborate.

Amidst their continuing impotence and/or indifference, I again offer a theoretical explication to fill the glaring void:

How? By sweet-talking skills you wouldn't believe, that he brought to bear via a a 1983 Motorola DynaTAC 8000x cell phone and a lot of time on his hands.​

​

Where? From a rocking chair on the front porch of his bungalow in the Belmont-Hillsboro neighborhood of Nashville, Tennessee.​

​

When? After losing his esteemed position of 37 years at the kissing booth at the annual Lincoln County Fair due to Covid-19.​

​

Why? He became a bitter man, enraged because his target had lied to him repeatedly, telling him that he had it "under control!", that it would just "go away!", the there were "very few with it!", and that "everybody's getting better!"​

​

Who?​

Streckfuss "Cooter" Biden-Schnitz, Hunter's Wily Godfather!
​

 

[schmidlap]

WHY DID THE PA LEGISLATURE BREAK THE LAW AND CHANGE VOTING LAWS WITHOUT CHANGING THE PA CONSTITUTION?

How is the appeal to the U.S.Supreme Court coming along?

UPDATE

The tireless commitment to expose any of the legion of conspirators - the masterminds, coordinators, and operatives, Republican officeholders and judges included - in the vast, dastardly caper that deprived the Loser of his

"LANDSLIDE!"
​

Occasionally, feeble gasps are reported from Mar-a-Lago of “Rigged!” “Illegitimate!” and “Fraud!”, but there are no signs whatever of any of the Loser's fanatical minions - all those Trumpy politicians, Trumpy media outlets, Trumpy investigative reporters, or Trumpy prosecutors - outing even the lowliest flunky in the vast, multitudinous cabal. Not even after Trumpy Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick offered a $1 million reward for any evidence of fraud!

One possible lead is the elusive scammers' signature invisibility!

After the 2016 election, the failed casino operator and faded reality-tv performer explained how he had apparently lost the popular vote:

Trump tells Congressional leaders 3-5 million
'illegals' cost him popular vote
[Trump tells Congressional leaders 3-5 million 'illegals' cost him popular vote]
​

Not a single one of those millions of bogus balloteers could ever be identified, apprehended, or prosecuted, despite the intrepid Kansas sleuth being assigned to the case.

​

After the dedicated Kobach Commission deflated like a Korean War surplus whoopee cushion that Roger Stone had surreptitiously placed on the drivers's seat of the golf cart the Former Guy now makes everyone refer to as "Air Force One", who's to say the 3-5 million stealthy galoots didn't all go deep state undercover, reemerging after assuming the identities of Republican officeholders, judges, and key election commissioners and supervisors throughout the land?

Trump Sends Investigators to Hawaii
[Trump Sends Investigators to Hawaii, Gains in GOP Presidential Primary Poll]​

As soon as Trump's painstakingly-thorough investigators report back from Hawaii, let's assign them directly to the case!

​

[/Quote]

 

[schmidlap]

 

[busybee01]

You have no clue what a evidentiary hearing is.

No, I've just stood before a hundred judges myself as an expert witness (it's called Court Qualified). By the way genius, it is "an evidentiary hearing," not "a evidentiary hearing." Try learning English, then get back to me about your education much less knowledge of the courtroom or anything else.

You are the one who is clueless. A evidentiary hearing is not used to find evidence. You have to have evidence. Only then can you have a evidentiary hearing.


"Parties often file motions in civil matters prior to trial, such as to compel the other side to cooperate in an exchange of information called discovery or to seek summary judgment. Some type of motions may require a judge to make further review of evidence, such as in certain family court proceedings, while others, like summary judgment, only consist of oral argument. If the judge does need testimony, the hearing is an evidentiary hearing. Some hearings are a mixture of both."

What Happens During an Evidentiary Hearing? (legalbeagle.com)

Trump presented no evidence.

 

[busybee01]

No judge prevented Trump's lawyers from presenting evidence.

Screming Porotestors. Sure Bee, no judge ever stops you from presenting anything. Even if he/she decides your case has no standing before the Court. They will simply step aside and let you present evidence to the court all day long.







Get help.

Those are different cases. Numerous cases were dismissed for lack of evidence not standing.

 

[StormAl]

The election was stolen.

I mean no disrespect poster 'lenny', but.......but you could maybe want to either quit whining about the 2020 election, or....

Or prove that it was stolen.

It's sorta binary, that way.

Show us.
Show the FBI.
Show a state election authority.
Or, quit whining.

It's not a good look for a non-frivolous adult.
On the other hand, it's a perfect fit for the frivolous, be they adult or non-adult.

I mean no disrespect.

... because there was no 'big steal'?

 

[busybee01]

You are the only criminal I know of.

ARE YOU ACCUSING ME OF BEING A CRIMINAL?

TRYING TO STEAL A ELECTION IS CRIMINAL.

 

[busybee01]

You are the only criminal I know of. You have no clue what a evidentiary hearing is. The plaintiffs are required to produce evidence in their filing that a judge can look at. The judge is not here to function as a grand jury. The Trump lawyers provided absolutely no evidence of anything

They were never given the opportunity. So as usual, factually incorrect

Yes they were given the opportunity. When the case is filed, you have to provide evidence. You are factually incorrect as usual.

 

[busybee01]

Are you saying Trump appointed liberal judges?

Trump did his best to appoint conservative judges. Occasionally some of them make weird decisions from the bench.

These judges were honest and are not appointed to support Trump.

 

[Lastamender]

No matter what happens Trump will not let people forget about the massive fraud that took place. Whether Arizona proves it or not.

MAGA Rallies are Coming Back: Here is When to Expect Them & Trump's 2024 Announcement - Becker News

Donald Trump is bringing back MAGA rallies. And the American people may be able to attend them sooner than expected. The political development would thrust Donald Trump back into the limelight in a way that would overshadow his political rival Joe Biden. The contrast between Trump’s huge base of...

beckernews.com

 

[Lastamender]

No judge prevented Trump's lawyers from presenting evidence.

Screming Porotestors. Sure Bee, no judge ever stops you from presenting anything. Even if he/she decides your case has no standing before the Court. They will simply step aside and let you present evidence to the court all day long.







Get help.

Those are different cases. Numerous cases were dismissed for lack of evidence not standing.

Point some out.

 

[meaner gene]

Those are different cases. Numerous cases were dismissed for lack of evidence not standing.

One of the Pennsylvania cases was dismissed under the doctrine of laches.

Laches is an equitable doctrine, typically raised as an affirmative defense by a defendant in a civil dispute, whereby a party may be barred from raising a claim due to an unreasonable delay in pursuing the claim.

Republicans objected to the election law changes, only after letting the period for objecting expire, and not raising an objection for the Pennsylvania primary. They waited over a year, and until they lost the general election to raise objection.

 

[meaner gene]

Those are different cases. Numerous cases were dismissed for lack of evidence not standing.

Point some out.

One of the pennsylvania lawsuits was met by the judge telling them, there wasn't enough evidence in their pleadings to throw out a single vote, no less overturn a presidential election.

 

[jc456]

You are the only criminal I know of. You have no clue what a evidentiary hearing is. The plaintiffs are required to produce evidence in their filing that a judge can look at. The judge is not here to function as a grand jury. The Trump lawyers provided absolutely no evidence of anything

They were never given the opportunity. So as usual, factually incorrect

Yes they were given the opportunity. When the case is filed, you have to provide evidence. You are factually incorrect as usual.

Son,

the judges threw it out without hearing the evidence. You think an election judge can take physical ballots out? You’re delusional