Oddball
Unobtanium Member
We know you did, a real shitty one....And you swallowed their Keynesian crapola like it was ambrosia.Did you even make it to a shitty college?
A fucking idiot savant if there ever was one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We know you did, a real shitty one....And you swallowed their Keynesian crapola like it was ambrosia.Did you even make it to a shitty college?
We know you did, a real shitty one....And you swallowed their Keynesian crapola like it was ambrosia.
A fucking idiot savant if there ever was one.
Supposing I did, I still wouldnt be as thoroughly a propagandized little idiot savant as you, Dr. Freelunch.But you took 2 semesters of Home Econ in high school, right?
Do they teach higher revenues cause bigger deficits in any college? Even one that would let the Simp Horsesass in?We know you did, a real shitty one....And you swallowed their Keynesian crapola like it was ambrosia.
A fucking idiot savant if there ever was one.
What he's doing is what all disingenuous moonbat turds do, in pointing to the short-term downturn in revenues while ignoring the increases that occur when economic activity picks up, with more resources left in the hands of those who earned them.Do they teach higher revenues cause bigger deficits in any college? Even one that would let the Simp Horsesass in?
Can you figure out why what you "know" is at odds with the facts?Supposing I did, I still wouldnt be as thoroughly a propagandized little idiot savant as you, Dr. Freelunch.
The only econ text used is Da Constitooooshun.Do they teach higher revenues cause bigger deficits in any college? Even one that would let the Simp Horsesass in?
/——/ Why not cut spending by $600 million, then we’re ahead.No...that's 500 million to the deficit.
There is no Supply Side Fairy to fix it.
How would anyone get you to stop voting for big spenders who pledge to smite libs?/——/ Why not cut spending by $600 million, then we’re ahead.
Your "facts" are always cherry picked for maximum leftoid hack effect.Can you figure out why what you "know" is at odds with the facts?
/----/How would anyone get you to stop voting for big spenders who pledge to smite libs?
I know, right?/----/
![]()
If you won't even try to compete in the marketplace of facts, there isn't much for us to share.Your "facts" are always cherry picked for maximum leftoid hack effect.
Seriously, your economic "knowledge" is on a par with another Keynesian idiot savant, who has claimed that the WTC collapses were economic stimulus, and that an alien invasion would be a boon to the economy.
Just give it up.
Spending has nothing to do with deficits, just ask horseface and Lush./——/ Why not cut spending by $600 million, then we’re ahead.
Now that you've been schooled on the budget process, and the numbers, what are you telling Al Greenspan?Spending has nothing to do with deficits, just ask horseface and Lush.
I've had all the broken windows that can be shared for one lifetime, Dr. Freelunch....You're no enigma.If you won't even try to compete in the marketplace of facts, there isn't much for us to share.
This from a proponent of voodoo economicsYour "facts" are always cherry picked for maximum leftoid hack effect.
Seriously, your economic "knowledge" is on a par with another Keynesian idiot savant, who has claimed that the WTC collapses were economic stimulus, and that an alien invasion would be a boon to the economy.
Just give it up.
Never said that. Stop lyingSpending has nothing to do with deficits, just ask horseface and Lush.
Newp.This from a proponent of voodoo economics
So how do you plan to pay for stuff?Newp.
I don't GAF about increasing revenues to The State...The income tax is straight-up theft, and we'd all be better off without it altogether....The problem continues to be, and always has been, profligate spending.
So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.