Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

[The5thHorseman]

Oh, so now you're going back to the past. The tax cut line in your post was for 2017. Guess that means you admit you lost that argument, which you did. So, I understand why you moved the goal posts.

Well, duh...

We've had two Supply Side Tax cuts since 2000....in the each instance, revenue declined.

Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom, the revenue loss would have been more pronounced.

To which tax cuts were you referring?

Sockpuppets.

 

[Oddball]

So you asked for no good reason whatsoever since you didn’t know either? I mean talk about stupid and pointless lol

I asked for a very good reason; to show for all to see that you really haven't the first idea of what you're blabbering about.

I was right.

 

[Oddball]

Well, duh...

We've had two Supply Side Tax cuts since 2000....in the each instance, revenue declined.

Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom, the revenue loss would have been more pronounced.

To which tax cuts were you referring?

Sockpuppets.

"record setting Obama boom".....ROFLMFAO!

 

[Oddball]

Non-argument. You lose.

I asked a legit question, which he failed to answer.

Both you losers liose.

 

[bripat9643]

They do..

You don't understand them.

Sure I do. You, on the other hand, believe they are good for the voters.

 

[Billy000]

If that were true, why didn’t they make the cut permanent to begin with?

They couldn't without Dem votes. It was in all the papers.

They also wouldn’t do it for the sole fact that it was part of BBB.

Biden tried to make the middle class tax cuts permanent in BBB?

You’re completely making shit up. Again.

Uh yes it was part of the bush tax cut that was always temporary.

Temporary because the Dems all voted against it. It was in all the papers.

He then made it permanent for those making less than 400,000.

Obama's vote totals, in the House, to make the Bush cuts permanent.

View attachment 749810

https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll545.xml

In the Senate, it was 89 yes, 8 no.

Lol I’m making shit up huh? “It was all in the papers”. What the fuck does that even mean? I mean my god you said the same thing for two of your points.

Um yes that was the goal of BBB.

Build Back Better would cut taxes for nearly all households next year, new report finds

Almost all households would get a tax cut in 2022 under the Build Back Better framework. Then things get complicated.

www.cnbc.com

What’s funny about your random Googling is that you can’t even find accurate information for shit. Hey idiot that vote count you’re talking about was in 2012. It wasn’t the actual final vote that passed the law. This law was passed by congress in January of 2013.

In the House, 85 Republicans and 172 Democrats voted in favor while 151 Republicans and 16 Democrats were opposed.

House moves to avoid tumble over fiscal cliff - Washington Examiner

The House voted 257 to 167 late Tuesday to halt the nation's tumble over the fiscal cliff by agreeing to a Senate-passed measure that restores the barely expired Bush-era tax cuts for most people while raising taxes on high earners. The vote also postpones a cascade of massive reductions in...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Oh Todd you tried your best but you just couldn’t deliver. You did give the accurate senate vote count but we both know why you left out the party breakdown: the majority of democrats passed it!

I’m glad I could educate you on the matter though!

 

[bripat9643]

Unless it is supported by the data, you’re being grifted.


Bri,

Is it?
 

No, not unless it's supported by the data. It's supported by what Dims do and say.

 

[Oddball]

Lol I’m making shit up huh? “It was all in the papers”. What the fuck does that even mean? I mean my god you said the same thing for two of your points.

Um yes that was the goal of BBB.

Build Back Better would cut taxes for nearly all households next year, new report finds

Almost all households would get a tax cut in 2022 under the Build Back Better framework. Then things get complicated.

www.cnbc.com

What’s funny about your random Googling is that you can’t even find accurate information for shit.

Oh Todd you tried your best but you just couldn’t deliver. You did give the accurate senate vote count but we both know why you left out the party breakdown: the majority of democrats passed it!

I’m glad I could educate you on the matter though!

Accurate information and CNBC aren't even in the same galaxy, dullard.

 

[miketx]

you are told to believe by some idiot on TV or radio.

That's exactly what leftist vermin do.

 

[Hurricanelover]

The amazons, the googles, the microsofts, the fords, and the super rich all cheat like hell. It is time to force them to pay their goddamn taxes....

The middle class needs the break!

 

[Oddball]

The amazons, the googles, the microsofts, the fords, and the super rich all cheat like hell. It is time to force them to pay their goddamn taxes....

The middle class needs the break!

How about we all get the same deal they get?

Seems fair to me.

 

[Orangecat]

Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?​

Why don't democrats seem to understand the consequences of overspending?

 

[Billy000]

Accurate information and CNBC aren't even in the same galaxy, dullard.

You say that about any source that doesn’t suck republican dick.

 

[Billy000]

Why don't democrats seem to understand the consequences of overspending?

Nah I’m all for cutting wasteful spending.

 

[bripat9643]

Nah I’m all for cutting wasteful spending.

No you aren't. Other than the military, you can't name a single budget item that needs to be cut.

 

[Oddball]

You say that about any source that doesn’t suck republican dick.

Supposing that's true (it isn't), why is it that you can't ever find sources that don't suck democrat dick?

 

[The5thHorseman]

"record setting Obama boom".....ROFLMFAO!

How many times must I humiliate you in one day, sport?

 

[BackAgain]

How many times must I humiliate you in one day, sport?

The next time would be your very first, Horseshit.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Obviously you don't because turds like you are always proposing more spending and more taxes.

Do you want to go over the facts on spending....again, bri?

Are you ineducable?

 

[Independent thinker]

Well, duh...

We've had two Supply Side Tax cuts since 2000....in the each instance, revenue declined.

Had the second not occurred during the record setting Obama boom, the revenue loss would have been more pronounced.

To which tax cuts were you referring?

Sockpuppets.

The facts show revenue increased, unless you twist the facts.