Wong Kim Ark makes no such requirement on citizenship.
You need to reread paragraphs 96 and 118 which state that permission of the US government and legal domicile are also requirements.
Where does it say "legal" domicile. I've searched the law and cannot find it. The law refers to "permanent domicil."
The definition of 'domicile' is that it is the 'primary legal residence' of a person.
I have not yet found a single libtard that can answer this question. If Plyler was a ruling about jurisdiction giving birthright citizenship to those under the legal jurisdiction of US law, the why are illegals and legal aliens both not eligible to for birthright citizenship if born on US territories of American Samoa or Swain Island?
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clearly the US government has jurisdiction on its own territory, but aliens do not get citizenship if born in those territories.
Why if Plyler ruled on jurisdiction = birthright citizenship?
"The definition of 'domicile' is that it is the 'primary legal residence' of a person." Not in Wong Kim Ark is that definition offered. And a person's domicile is simply where they live. Their legal residence. And the use of the word legal has no reference to their immigration status. Illegal immigrants have legal residences.
And you never asked about Samoan's etc. Had you done so, you would have been referred to the numerous cases that have held that territories of the United States are not "in the United States." There are numerous cases on this. Here is part of one:
"The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that "[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, section 1. Both parties seem to agree that American Samoa is "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, and other courts have concluded as much.
See Pls.' Opp'n at 2; Defs.' Mem. at 14 (citing
Rabang as noting that the territories are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States). But to be covered by the Citizenship Clause, a person must be born or naturalized "in the United States
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof."
Thus, the key question becomes whether American Samoa qualifies as a part of the "United States" as that is used within the Citizenship Clause.8
The Supreme Court famously addressed the extent to which the Constitution applies in territories in a series of cases known as the Insular Cases.
9 In these cases, the Supreme Court contrasted "incorporated" territories — those lands expressly made part of the United States by an act of Congress — with "unincorporated territories" that had not yet become part of the United States and were not on a path toward statehood.
See, e.g., Downes, 182 U.S. at 312, 21 S.Ct. 770;
Dorr v. United States, 195 U.S. 138, 143, 24 S.Ct. 808, 49 L.Ed. 128 (1904);
see also United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259, 268, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990);
Eche v. Holder, 694 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir.2012) (citing
Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 757-58,
128 S.Ct. 2229, 171 L.Ed.2d 41 (2008)).
10 In an unincorporated territory, the Insular Cases held that only certain "fundamental" constitutional
rights are extended to its inhabitants.
Dorr, 195 U.S. at 148-49, 24 S.Ct. 808;
Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298, 312, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed. 627 (1922);
see also Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. at 268, 110 S.Ct. 1056. While none of the Insular Cases directly addressed the Citizenship Clause, they suggested that citizenship was not a "fundamental" right that applied to unincorporated territories."
So, once again, you completely fail to understand the basic legal principles being discussed. Samoans are not citizens, not because they are not subject to US jurisdiction. Clearly, they are. They are not citizens because they fail to meet the other one of the TWO requirement. They were not born in the United States. Did you really think that Samoa was in the United States? So, in addition to flunking US Government, you flunked geography?
