Why doesn't the US government ban porn?

[hortysir]

yes, the entertainment value is the prime purpose, but a side effect is that it is an outlet for males who can't get it any other way. Muting the sex drive of these guys probably lowers crime rates.

Yeah, it's just entertainment for ADULTS who have the natural feelings/urges/drives that ADULTS have...who the hell else's business is it lol?

I wonder why the OP put this in the religion section instead of the politics section...

Peace.

You're the one asking if someone is Christian

 

[Anonymous1977]

Because the abomination of hypocrisy is worse and the right doesn't have the moral fortitude to ban that.

The "right," the "left," or whoever is supposed to do the will of the people not the will of themselves. The majority of Americans want adult entertainment ("porn") to be legal.

Peace.

 

[rightwinger]

You are obviously not a fan of the "educational value" of National Geographic

Lol...you obviously did not address my question. Are you a "Christian" race-hate spewer lol?

Calling someone from Africa a "jungle woman" can be offensive. Would you be offended if I referred to women specifically from Europe as "cave women" (as Europe has alot of caves.)

Get a life, doodoo man lol.

Where did RW say anything about Africa?

National Geographic had a lot of Amazon boobies too

 

[Anonymous1977]

Private parties are people too

I said (and the Constitution says,) "THE people," not "people," jack-*ss lol.

 

[Anonymous1977]

Where did RW say anything about Africa?

National Geographic primarily covered Africa, you dufis LOL...

 

[rightwinger]

Where did RW say anything about Africa?

National Geographic primarily covered Africa, you dufis LOL...

Actually, they covered boobies from around the world

Not white ones though

 

[Anonymous1977]

You're the one asking if someone is Christian

Christianity is not my religion. You really are off somewhere, aren't you?

 

[Anonymous1977]

Actually, they covered boobies from around the world

Not white ones though

Were the White ones too ugly LOL?

And I said "primarily," dookie-man lol.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, they covered boobies from around the world

Not white ones though

Were the White ones too ugly LOL?

And I said "primarily," dookie-man lol.

If National Geographic showed white boobies it would have been considered "porn"

Showing naked jungle women was science

 

[RKMBrown]

Actually, they covered boobies from around the world

Not white ones though

Were the White ones too ugly LOL?

And I said "primarily," dookie-man lol.

If National Geographic showed white boobies it would have been considered "porn"

Showing naked jungle women was science

Playboy is art..

 

[Anonymous1977]

f National Geographic showed white boobies it would have been considered "porn"

Showing naked jungle women was science

LOLOL...yeah well I think that the cave women were just too ugly, and the mag wouldn't have sold, you know? LOLOL

 

[hortysir]

Private parties are people too

I said (and the Constitution says,) "THE people," not "people," jack-*ss lol.

People is plural

 

[hortysir]

You're the one asking if someone is Christian

Christianity is not my religion. You really are off somewhere, aren't you?

You asked RW if he was Christian.
Then you ask why this is in religion and ethics

 

[hortysir]

Where did RW say anything about Africa?

National Geographic primarily covered Africa, you dufis LOL...

Amazon, Congo, Central America all have more jungles than Africa.
Why did your little mind jump to Africa?

 

[Anonymous1977]

People is plural

In all seriousness, it is sad that the American government has been taken from the American people...I don't know or know about who popularized the phrase "take back your goverment" so I'm not aligning myself with him/her/them, but I agree that the American people need to find a way to take back our government.

 

[Anonymous1977]

Amazon, Congo, Central America all have more jungles than Africa.
Why did your little mind jump to Africa?

Because cave women are too ugly and cave people in general have a too stinky body odor, that's why LOLOL.

 

[rightwinger]

f National Geographic showed white boobies it would have been considered "porn"

Showing naked jungle women was science

LOLOL...yeah well I think that the cave women were just too ugly, and the mag wouldn't have sold, you know? LOLOL

Cave women are fucking HOT

Check out Wilma Flintstone

 

[Anonymous1977]

Cave women are fucking HOT

Check out Wilma Flintstone

Too FLAT for my taste LOLOL.

 

[danielpalos]

... for the same reason government doesn't ban the abomination of hypocrisy even with a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, they covered boobies from around the world

Not white ones though

Were the White ones too ugly LOL?

And I said "primarily," dookie-man lol.

If National Geographic showed white boobies it would have been considered "porn"

Showing naked jungle women was science

Playboy is art..

I wouldn't know

I only read the articles