OH so those liberals owned no slaves? Those liberals only viewed White males over the age of 21 as being able to vote. Are you talking about liberals like that?
Now we are getting somewhere Reb!
Now that you are admitting that our founding fathers were liberals we can continue with your American History lesson
Freedom progresses in steps. The founding fathers had a hard enough time getting the basic freedoms of our Constitution approved. Keep in mind....they had Conservatives fighting their initiatives
So the best you could get in the 1780s was freedoms and voting rights extended to white males over 21. But liberals did not rest on their laurels. They continued to fight for the rights of slaves, then women, then native Americans. All the time resisted by conservatives of the day
Not all liberals. Liberalism, like conservatism, is relative. Once a certain point is reached, a portion of those percieved as liberal will then say "OK, we reached the right point." They then become fans of the status quo, i.e. conservative.
A good example is the civil rights movement of the 60's. Alot of people were behind removing the after affects of Jim Crow laws, and plessy v. ferguson. Once that happened however, and the push was made for things like affermative action and forced bussing, alot of the people who supported the civil rights movement stopped doing so. They did not support going back to the way things were, they just didnt support the new initatives.
Its similar to my view on the EPA. Yes, the EPA has done good, and improved air and water quality, but its getting to the point where it is forcing compaines to spend lots of money on little gain. Making someone spend 5 million to get NOx concentrations from 100 ppm to 30 ppm is a great idea. making them spend 50 million to go from 30ppm to 25 ppm, especially when that 5 ppm decrease has negligible benefits is something else entirely.