Why does the left count the ACA as one of Obama's successes?

[Remodeling Maidiac]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

 

[Sallow]

Because for nearly a century in this country, US presidents have been trying, with little or no success, to pass a National Healthcare Act.

Obama got it done.

That's why.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

It's a stumble in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in a day.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Because for nearly a century in this country, US presidents have been trying, with little or no success, to pass a National Healthcare Act.

Obama got it done.

That's why.

WTF are you serious? Simply passing it regardless of the bills actual effect on us is now the sign of success?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Same reason they think Hillary is a shoe-in in 2016, it's the LSD

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

It's a stumble in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in a day.

Seems more like a huge leap in the wrong direction. Why not just target the uninsured rather than screwing up the entire system?

 

[Sallow]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

1. Well no. It's well on it's way to meeting it's goals.
2. What happened to two?
3. Actually? That was a health insurance industry ploy to sell crappy policies and then blame Obama when they got cancelled. Good on you folks to support that shit.
4. There was nothing "arbitrary" about the changes. Much like many big Federal programs changes are needed once the rubber hits the road. The difference now being, one party is in overdrive to obstruct.
5. That depends alot of who you are..
6. Some are, some aren't.
7 Not according to the CBO reports. Which you guys keep ignoring.

 

[bedowin62]

Answer: every one of his failures

 

[PaintMyHouse]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

It's a stumble in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in a day.

Seems more like a huge leap in the wrong direction. Why not just target the uninsured rather than screwing up the entire system?

Because the entire system is what's broken.

 

[Sallow]

Because for nearly a century in this country, US presidents have been trying, with little or no success, to pass a National Healthcare Act.

Obama got it done.

That's why.

WTF are you serious? Simply passing it regardless of the bills actual effect on us is now the sign of success?

Yeah.

I'm very serious.

In political terms, this was the holy grail.

 

[ClosedCaption]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

It's a stumble in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in a day.

Seems more like a huge leap in the wrong direction. Why not just target the uninsured rather than screwing up the entire system?

Ask the Heritage Foundation and the GOP support for it for a decade before Obama came around

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

1. Well no. It's well on it's way to meeting it's goals.
2. What happened to two?
3. Actually? That was a health insurance industry ploy to sell crappy policies and then blame Obama when they got cancelled. Good on you folks to support that shit.
4. There was nothing "arbitrary" about the changes. Much like many big Federal programs changes are needed once the rubber hits the road. The difference now being, one party is in overdrive to obstruct.
5. That depends alot of who you are..
6. Some are, some aren't.
7 Not according to the CBO reports. Which you guys keep ignoring.

1. The people signing up are not the healthy ones. This will cause MAJOR funding issues vs outlays.

2. Dunno wtf ? Lol

3. Thats YOUR opinion

4. Dictatorial changes are not how we're supposed to do things. ESPECIALLY on something that effects every single American. I have a representative for a reason and that reason isn't for Obama to bypass.

5. Ok

6. Ok

7. See #1

 

[chikenwing]

Because for nearly a century in this country, US presidents have been trying, with little or no success, to pass a National Healthcare Act.

Obama got it done.

That's why.

WTF are you serious? Simply passing it regardless of the bills actual effect on us is now the sign of success?

Yeah.

I'm very serious.

In political terms, this was the holy grail.

Really, who's the opposition party?

 

[kaz]

Why does the left count the ACA as one of Obama's successes?

They achieved their objective, government control. Beyond that, quality doesn't matter, only sameness matters. We all have equal access to a crappy system. To them, that is success.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

WTF are you serious? Simply passing it regardless of the bills actual effect on us is now the sign of success?

Yeah.

I'm very serious.

In political terms, this was the holy grail.

Really, who's the opposition party?

The opposition party is called I Got Mine, so screw you...

 

[bedowin62]

Yeah.

I'm very serious.

In political terms, this was the holy grail.

Really, who's the opposition party?

The opposition party is called I Got Mine, so screw you...

there is MORE POVERTY since Progressives started "helping" people

true story

 

[chikenwing]

1. They are missing their own projections of needed sign ups to support the bill by nearly 2 million.

3. The law has cost more people their insurance tjan uninsureds it has helped.

4. Major portions of the law have been arbitrarily changed or delayed without congressional approval.

5. By all reports unless you're indigent or cheat the system your payments are likely to increase, some dramatically.

6. Democrats up for election are running AWAY from it. Some say it's changed so much it's not the bill they voted for (blatant lies)

7. It is going to increase our debt massivly.


Where are the successes?

1. Well no. It's well on it's way to meeting it's goals.
2. What happened to two?
3. Actually? That was a health insurance industry ploy to sell crappy policies and then blame Obama when they got cancelled. Good on you folks to support that shit.
4. There was nothing "arbitrary" about the changes. Much like many big Federal programs changes are needed once the rubber hits the road. The difference now being, one party is in overdrive to obstruct.
5. That depends alot of who you are..
6. Some are, some aren't.
7 Not according to the CBO reports. Which you guys keep ignoring.

1. The people signing up are not the healthy ones. This will cause MAJOR funding issues vs outlays.

2. Dunno wtf ? Lol

3. Thats YOUR opinion

4. Dictatorial changes are not how we're supposed to do things. ESPECIALLY on something that effects every single American. I have a representative for a reason and that reason isn't for Obama to bypass.

5. Ok

6. Ok

7. See #1

Its like the fact that it depends on young people to enroll in large numbers,but at the same time,they can stay on their parents policies until 26,which short circuits that whole idea.Another large group that is optioned out by default,some real forward thinking.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Really, who's the opposition party?

The opposition party is called I Got Mine, so screw you...

there is MORE POVERTY since Progressives started "helping" people

true story

The economy sucks. That happens when you don't spread the cash around.

 

[kaz]

Ask the Heritage Foundation and the GOP support for it for a decade before Obama came around

The Heritage foundation and Newt only advocated a fine for not having healthcare, Obamacare is far beyond that, none of which they ever advocated.

They both also realized it was a stupid idea and backed off it. Apparently even though they once advocated a stupid thing, they are still well ahead of you.

 

[kaz]

The opposition party is called I Got Mine, so screw you...

there is MORE POVERTY since Progressives started "helping" people

true story

The economy sucks. That happens when you don't spread the cash around.

LOL, you're arguing that more welfare is good for the economy. Wow.