Ravi
Diamond Member
Why don't Twitter, Youtube, etc., just refuse to host them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a good enough reason.Those sites get hits off those videos.
Perhaps. I am ready to boycott all social media and I think we all should to force them to stop showing this crap and using it to recruit.Not a good enough reason.Those sites get hits off those videos.
I know, they just shouldn't show the videos. That said, banning those sites will not stop the sites overseas from showing it.
Why don't Twitter, Youtube, etc., just refuse to host them?
Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
And why not?Interesting. So we should have let Hitler speak to the American public during WW2?It's a drawback to freedom.
you take the good with the bad or admit you don't want to be free.
ISIS is covered by our constitution?Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
you want terrorist in gitmo to have our rights, so you make no pointISIS is covered by our constitution?Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
If that's Lonestar logic....
The Constitution doesn't say a business can't control content. It says the government can't.
Speech isn't guaranteed a platform.ISIS is covered by our constitution?Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
Free speech is. I'm pretty sure the bill of rights doesn't specify that speech must originate in any particular place.
That's what I said. I said I will boycott them and the rest of us should as well.Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
If that's Lonestar logic....
The Constitution doesn't say a business can't control content. It says the government can't.
No one suggested it did.
My point is that as a typical liberal, Ravi wants to silence (censor) what she doesn't like. If a person doesn't like what they see on social media, then they should excise their right to not engage in social media. But that would be too easy.
Speech isn't guaranteed a platform.ISIS is covered by our constitution?Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
Free speech is. I'm pretty sure the bill of rights doesn't specify that speech must originate in any particular place.
How does social media justify giving terrorists a platform?