Why does anyone need a high-capacity magazine?

[harmonica]

hahahhahahahahahhah
why don't you carry a knife

Because a firearm is better at projecting deadly force.
Duh.

hahahahah--you ''gun'' nuts are contradicting yourselves big time

When did I contradict myself?
How is my answer wrong?

so--you AGREE, knives are not as deadly as firearms........?????

 

[M14 Shooter]

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

How do you know?

 

[M14 Shooter]

hahahhahahahahahhah
why don't you carry a knife

Because a firearm is better at projecting deadly force.
Duh.

hahahahah--you ''gun'' nuts are contradicting yourselves big time

When did I contradict myself?
How is my answer wrong?

hahhahahah--read it again and reply
I said you gun nutS

So, you cannot demonstrate how I contradicted myself, or tell me how my answer is wrong.
Got it.
Thanks.

 

[harmonica]

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

How do you know?

already answered in a previous post
please--stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW they didn't-COULDN'T mean it

 

[Desperado]

Why would they worry about the makers of the rifle?
Remember AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle

obviously and undeniably they meant muskets

What makes you say that it was obviously undeniable they meant muskets? Where is the proof? Or is just your opinion

are you kidding???!!!

So I take it, that was just your opinion.

I don't think many civilians could buy cannons/etc
there were no 30 round hand held weapons invented/etc
duh

Ok if you want to get picky, muskets were the state of the art weapons at the time. The colonist used their own muskets which were indeed military grade weapons. How was that not covered by the 2A

 

[harmonica]

hahahhahahahahahhah
why don't you carry a knife

Because a firearm is better at projecting deadly force.
Duh.

hahahahah--you ''gun'' nuts are contradicting yourselves big time

When did I contradict myself?
How is my answer wrong?

hahhahahah--read it again and reply
I said you gun nutS

So, you cannot demonstrate how I contradicted myself, or tell me how my answer is wrong.
Got it.
Thanks.

so---one last time--are knives less deadly than firearms?

 

[harmonica]

obviously and undeniably they meant muskets

What makes you say that it was obviously undeniable they meant muskets? Where is the proof? Or is just your opinion

are you kidding???!!!

So I take it, that was just your opinion.

I don't think many civilians could buy cannons/etc
there were no 30 round hand held weapons invented/etc
duh

Ok if you want to get picky, muskets were the state of the art weapons at the time. The colonist used their own muskets which were indeed military grade weapons. How was that not covered by the 2A

....muskets--sure---but they COULD NOT have meant 30 round weapons--IMPOSSIBLE for them to mean that
..like I told 14, stop the ridiculousness--you KNOW they did not mean AR 15s/etc

 

[Wry Catcher]

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

Why would they worry about the makers of the rifle?
Remember AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle

obviously and undeniably they meant muskets

Patented 1718. Does this look like a musket to you?

View attachment 279086

Not to me, and I can only guess that such a weapon would have been locked in the armory and only the Cap't of the Militia would have had the key.

 

[harmonica]

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

Why would they worry about the makers of the rifle?
Remember AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle

obviously and undeniably they meant muskets

Patented 1718. Does this look like a musket to you?

View attachment 279086

Not to me, and I can only guess that such a weapon would have been locked in the armory and only the Cap't of the Militia would have had the key.

....most people couldn't afford weapons like that...the ''gun'' nuts are thinking of 1700s in 2000s terms = idiocy

 

[johnwk]

Why does anyone need a high-capacity magazine?

Our Founders intended ordinary citizens to keep and bear arms [a contemporary fire arm used by foot soldiers] so they would be ready and able to defend themselves against a despotic government if necessary.

The AR-15-semi is a civilian version of the United States military’s M16 and ought to be kept by ordinary citizens to defend against a tyrannical communist/socialist government if necessary.

Forewarned is forearmed.

JWK

In every oppressive country like communist China, socialist Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela, etc., the people are disarmed and suffer the loss of inalienable rights under an iron fisted government which lives large on the people’s labor.

 

[iceberg]

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

How do you know?

already answered in a previous post
please--stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW they didn't-COULDN'T mean it

please - stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW you have NO IDEA what they meant, you just can't see them meaning anything other than how YOU feel.

sorry, that isn't going to change our bill of rights.

 

[miketx]

133, and I don't buy it, unless you were shot or clubbed in the head on duty... Or are Christopher Dorner's ghost.

133 huh. How do you know?

I took a test, duh.

BTW, were there a lot of bigots in your PD, or were you the only one?

Which test and when? SB5, WAIS? Or was it one of those on-line whose validity and reliabiltiy are not noted. I ask because in Grad School I took a two semester coursed in "Testing for Counselors". A course where we tool most of the standardized tests and learned to score them.

I'm not intolerant of all gun owners, only those who have little tiny man organs and need to parade their guns around. Kind of like those guys in trench coats though they rarely hurt anyone.

Instead of repeating your fixation about "tiny little man organs:" you MIGHT go out on the web and view how QUICKLY you can fire thru 10 round magazines... It's a "feel good" thing... You know the stuff that lefties want to have to SAY they've fixed the "crazy shooter" problem.....

That gives you a hard on right????

No Mr. Mod, it does not give me a hard on, a question which has nothing to do with a forum on politics.

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

You're a lying sack of shit like always. No one can own any arm they want ya lying pos! Shall not be infringed means what it says! Come get them!

 

[iceberg]

also - it's a bill of rights. not a bill of needs.

no one NEEDS a ferrari. no one NEEDS soft drinks. no one NEEDS to post on here...

 

[harmonica]

That said, mocking the insane gun owners who believe any person can own any arm because some 18th Century author wrote, "shall not be infringed" is as obsolete today as it was in 1791.

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

How do you know?

already answered in a previous post
please--stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW they didn't-COULDN'T mean it

please - stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW you have NO IDEA what they meant, you just can't see them meaning anything other than how YOU feel.

sorry, that isn't going to change our bill of rights.

hahahahha-undeniably they did not mean ARs
I KNOW they did not mean ARs

 

[miketx]

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

Why would they worry about the makers of the rifle?
Remember AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle

obviously and undeniably they meant muskets

Patented 1718. Does this look like a musket to you?

View attachment 279086

Not to me, and I can only guess that such a weapon would have been locked in the armory and only the Cap't of the Militia would have had the key.

You are an idiot everyday. They kept their own guns liar.

 

[harmonica]

also - it's a bill of rights. not a bill of needs.

no one NEEDS a ferrari. no one NEEDS soft drinks. no one NEEDS to post on here...

there's the idiotic crap again = equating cars/ [ now soft drinks!!! '] to firearms
free speech is limited
....the 2A writers thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote--so you believe they are perfect?

 

[harmonica]

also - it's a bill of rights. not a bill of needs.

no one NEEDS a ferrari. no one NEEDS soft drinks. no one NEEDS to post on here...

o--yes--we NEED cars/vehicles--without them, you will have a lot of dead people/etc
..and it is VERY ridiculous to think we do not need vehicles/cars/etc

 

[iceberg]

also - it's a bill of rights. not a bill of needs.

no one NEEDS a ferrari. no one NEEDS soft drinks. no one NEEDS to post on here...

o--yes--we NEED cars/vehicles--without them, you will have a lot of dead people/etc
..and it is VERY ridiculous to think we do not need vehicles/cars/etc

i didn't say cars/vehicles, i said ferraris.

keep the **** up.

 

[iceberg]

View attachment 279075

^ Until then: Shutup. Idiot.

they obviously did not mean ARs---this is undeniable

How do you know?

already answered in a previous post
please--stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW they didn't-COULDN'T mean it

please - stop the very ridiculous crap --you KNOW you have NO IDEA what they meant, you just can't see them meaning anything other than how YOU feel.

sorry, that isn't going to change our bill of rights.

hahahahha-undeniably they did not mean ARs
I KNOW they did not mean ARs

i know you're an idiot.

the rest if debatable.

 

[harmonica]

also - it's a bill of rights. not a bill of needs.

no one NEEDS a ferrari. no one NEEDS soft drinks. no one NEEDS to post on here...

o--yes--we NEED cars/vehicles--without them, you will have a lot of dead people/etc
..and it is VERY ridiculous to think we do not need vehicles/cars/etc

i didn't say cars/vehicles, i said ferraris.

keep the **** up.

last time I checked a Ferrari was a car
hahahahhahah--you FKED up that time
hahahhahahaha