Why does america ignore black on black crime?

it's black on white crime that is being ignored

our current AG will certainly not address it nor will the POTUS in fact they encourage more of it
Wrong! That too has been rammed down our throats ad-nauseam for decades. I wonder why no AG or POTUS ever addressed it? Is it because out of a general population of between 250-300 millions the paltry 200-400 black on white homicides per year do not add up to a hill of beans? Could it be that the more pressing issue is to first get a handle on the larger numbers of Whites killing Whites and Blacks killing Blacks? No need to thank me for enlightening you... the pleasure was mine!
link?
 
squeeze, you have never bothered to offer serious evidence. So on this one, boy, look it up yourself.
 
it's black on white crime that is being ignored

our current AG will certainly not address it nor will the POTUS in fact they encourage more of it
Wrong! That too has been rammed down our throats ad-nauseam for decades. I wonder why no AG or POTUS ever addressed it? Is it because out of a general population of between 250-300 millions the paltry 200-400 black on white homicides per year do not add up to a hill of beans? Could it be that the more pressing issue is to first get a handle on the larger numbers of Whites killing Whites and Blacks killing Blacks? No need to thank me for enlightening you... the pleasure was mine!
link?

it's black on white crime that is being ignored

our current AG will certainly not address it nor will the POTUS in fact they encourage more of it
Wrong! That too has been rammed down our throats ad-nauseam for decades. I wonder why no AG or POTUS ever addressed it? Is it because out of a general population of between 250-300 millions the paltry 200-400 black on white homicides per year do not add up to a hill of beans? Could it be that the more pressing issue is to first get a handle on the larger numbers of Whites killing Whites and Blacks killing Blacks? No need to thank me for enlightening you... the pleasure was mine!
link?

Common knowledge needs no link! Besides when YOU start providing links perhaps that civil gesture will encourage me and others to follow suit. Until then don't ask unto others what you don't do yourself!
 
Yo, suplex3000, what does it matter? The Democrat Party kills more black babies through ABORTION? So if you want to get mad at someone, it should be the leader of the Democrat Party, that would be half and half Obama!
40.jpg
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.

Jackson or Sharpton I said- the 2 loudest mouths of racists. SHOW ME ONE vid of them speaking on black on black crime!
 
No one in America is ignoring black on black crime. And no one in America will allow white racialists to use black on black crime as an excuse to ignore the lynching history of the past. Ese?

Do you have anything to back that up with? re: black on black crime?

-Geaux
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.

Jackson or Sharpton I said- the 2 loudest mouths of racists. SHOW ME ONE vid of them speaking on black on black crime!

Sharpton All hands on deck to stop gun violence MSNBC

http://abc7chicago.com/news/civil-rights-group-to-convene-anti-violence-summit-in-chicago/172589/
 
Last edited:
"The American black is not representative of blacks as a whole" is the stupid post of the day.

Just what does that mean?
You think an American black is representative of black Africa?

Think dude.

The poorest blacks here are 1%ers compared to real poverty in Africa.

In Africa, survival of the fittest is in play, here, we subsidize the weakest.

I have a Nigerian friend.

He scoffs at American blacks, won't even associate with them.
I have a Nigerian friend as well as one from Togo, Eritrea, and Ethiopia. They associate with me just fine.
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.

Jackson or Sharpton I said- the 2 loudest mouths of racists. SHOW ME ONE vid of them speaking on black on black crime!
I am not going to waste my time. If you google it, I'm sure you will find some reference to it. There was televised new coverage so look for it!
 
Black on black crime is addressed all of the time. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean there aren't groups out there in the community. Hell, the racists bring it up everyday. Perhaps you should do some research on outreach programs that are out there in the black community. This black on black crime discussion you guys are pushing is nothing more than propaganda and a red herring to shut down any discussion of police shootings and such because the conversation is out there. You are just listening to mouth pieces trying to justify police brutaliity and racism.
 
Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.

Jackson or Sharpton I said- the 2 loudest mouths of racists. SHOW ME ONE vid of them speaking on black on black crime!

Sharpton All hands on deck to stop gun violence MSNBC

http://abc7chicago.com/news/civil-rights-group-to-convene-anti-violence-summit-in-chicago/172589/

did you read the top comment?
 
Black on black crime is addressed all of the time. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean there aren't groups out there in the community. Hell, the racists bring it up everyday. Perhaps you should do some research on outreach programs that are out there in the black community. This black on black crime discussion you guys are pushing is nothing more than propaganda and a red herring to shut down any discussion of police shootings and such because the conversation is out there. You are just listening to mouth pieces trying to justify police brutaliity and racism.

how many police shootings last year?
 
Black on black crime is addressed all of the time. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean there aren't groups out there in the community. Hell, the racists bring it up everyday. Perhaps you should do some research on outreach programs that are out there in the black community. This black on black crime discussion you guys are pushing is nothing more than propaganda and a red herring to shut down any discussion of police shootings and such because the conversation is out there. You are just listening to mouth pieces trying to justify police brutaliity and racism.

how many police shootings last year?
Does it matter? That is what manifests these conversations, no? Every time there is a police shootng...white killing black or what not...whites immediately start with the false narrative that blacks aren't addressing black on black crime.

Why aren't whites addressing all of the mass murders, school shootings, suicides, serial killers, meth abuse, pain pill abuse, pedophilia and violence in the white community. Where is that discussion? How many massive school shootings do you need before you realie your commnuity has a problem?
 
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.

Jackson or Sharpton I said- the 2 loudest mouths of racists. SHOW ME ONE vid of them speaking on black on black crime!

Sharpton All hands on deck to stop gun violence MSNBC

http://abc7chicago.com/news/civil-rights-group-to-convene-anti-violence-summit-in-chicago/172589/

did you read the top comment?
Did you read my post?
 
Black on black crime is addressed all of the time. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean there aren't groups out there in the community. Hell, the racists bring it up everyday. Perhaps you should do some research on outreach programs that are out there in the black community. This black on black crime discussion you guys are pushing is nothing more than propaganda and a red herring to shut down any discussion of police shootings and such because the conversation is out there. You are just listening to mouth pieces trying to justify police brutaliity and racism.

how many police shootings last year?
Black police shootings or are you trying to deflect?
 
The question should be why does america ignore white on white crime?
Shhh...there is no such thing. Only blacks and Mexicans commit crimes. All of those school shoootings were hoaxes. And the VT shooter was ASian...so that justifies any white mass shootings.
 
The question should be why does america ignore white on white crime?
Shhh...there is no such thing. Only blacks and Mexicans commit crimes. All of those school shoootings were hoaxes. And the VT shooter was ASian...so that justifies any white mass shootings.
I guess if you use enough illegal drugs like meth and crack you can create your own reality.
lol.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top