Why does america ignore black on black crime?

In some recent stats it says 93% of blacks are killed by other blacks. In the past 15 years in america its estimated that over 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of other blacks. Isnt it kind of ironic that they preach "black lives matter" but they obviously dont matter that much if they have such a high murder rate within their own race. Why is society so hesitant to admit that blacks are more violent as a whole than whites? I dont understand how its racist to say that. Its just the facts. Im not saying there arent any violent whites but when theres all this outrage about how many blacks are imprisoned it just doesn't make sense to me. Again i obviously understand there are plenty of blacks whom are none violent and good functioning members of society but their majority is not that way. i know yahoo answers isnt the type of place to have rational debate and discussion im sure i will be attacked and insulted for posting this but if you are mature enough to handle what ive said i would really appreciate and adult discussion as to why you feel what ive said is wrong.

What makes YOU think America is ignoring black on black crime? Every argument on race on USMB and all over the Internet contains references to it ,ad-nauseum. There is no escaping it. For decades there has been no let up in the onslaught of critique. No, black on black homicide/crime has not been ignored at all. It is used prolifically to help underscore the perceived inferiority of all Blacks in the eyes of the civilized world.



It is White on White homicide/crime that is being ignored:

White on White crime more prevalent than Black on Black Call Post Newspaper Cleveland Ohio

Call & Post said:
When the news talks about gang-related deaths, they treat it as an almost exclusively Black problem. However, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, for the period of 1980 to 2008, a majority (53.3 percent) of gang homicides were committed by White offenders, and the majority of gang homicide victims (56.5 percent) were White.

When was the last time you’ve seen on the news, discussions about a White-gang problem?

Crimes committed by White people are explained as deviations of the individual but have nothing to do with race, but crimes committed by Blacks or Latino’s are somehow attributed to race. Gang-bangers from South Chicago have somehow become a symbol that Black men are to be feared, but you don’t get the same fear that one could attach to the brutal murders committed by Neo-Nazi skinheads.

According to statistics from the Justice Department, White men are more likely to kill than any other racial group. When it comes to how and why people kill, Black men do, in fact, outnumber Whites in gun-related homicides, but especially drug-related offenses. However, White men top the list in most all other categories.

When the Bureau of Justice Statistics collected homicidal rates from 1980 to 2008, they found that compared to Blacks, Whites were more likely to kill children, the elderly, family members, and their significant others. They commit more sex-related crimes, gang related crimes, and are more likely to kill at their places of employment.

So why does America still perpetuate the lie of Black criminality?

Is it because one in 15 Black men are in prison? That may not explain it. The racial biases in the War on Drugs contribute to the high incarceration rates. Studies show that Blacks are no more likely than Whites to use or sell drugs. Blacks actually only make up 14 percent of regular drug users. Yet Blacks are more likely to be arrested for drug crimes, and receive longer sentences than Whites.

Should we blame gangster rap with the gun-toting rappers? If so, why can’t we blame a White man with a pistol being used to symbolize Second Amendment rights?
 
It really is a shame all the senseless killing they do to each other

But what can you do? the people in this country has tried and tried to give them a hand up. they've voted for one party for years and look where they are STILL
 
In some recent stats it says 93% of blacks are killed by other blacks. In the past 15 years in america its estimated that over 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of other blacks. Isnt it kind of ironic that they preach "black lives matter" but they obviously dont matter that much if they have such a high murder rate within their own race. Why is society so hesitant to admit that blacks are more violent as a whole than whites? I dont understand how its racist to say that. Its just the facts. Im not saying there arent any violent whites but when theres all this outrage about how many blacks are imprisoned it just doesn't make sense to me. Again i obviously understand there are plenty of blacks whom are none violent and good functioning members of society but their majority is not that way. i know yahoo answers isnt the type of place to have rational debate and discussion im sure i will be attacked and insulted for posting this but if you are mature enough to handle what ive said i would really appreciate and adult discussion as to why you feel what ive said is wrong.

What makes YOU think America is ignoring black on black crime? Every argument on race on USMB and all over the Internet contains references to it ,ad-nauseum. There is no escaping it. For decades there has been no let up in the onslaught of critique. No, black on black homicide/crime has not been ignored at all. It is used prolifically to help underscore the perceived inferiority of all Blacks in the eyes of the civilized world.



It is White on White homicide/crime that is being ignored:

White on White crime more prevalent than Black on Black Call Post Newspaper Cleveland Ohio

Call & Post said:
When the news talks about gang-related deaths, they treat it as an almost exclusively Black problem. However, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, for the period of 1980 to 2008, a majority (53.3 percent) of gang homicides were committed by White offenders, and the majority of gang homicide victims (56.5 percent) were White.

When was the last time you’ve seen on the news, discussions about a White-gang problem?

Crimes committed by White people are explained as deviations of the individual but have nothing to do with race, but crimes committed by Blacks or Latino’s are somehow attributed to race. Gang-bangers from South Chicago have somehow become a symbol that Black men are to be feared, but you don’t get the same fear that one could attach to the brutal murders committed by Neo-Nazi skinheads.

According to statistics from the Justice Department, White men are more likely to kill than any other racial group. When it comes to how and why people kill, Black men do, in fact, outnumber Whites in gun-related homicides, but especially drug-related offenses. However, White men top the list in most all other categories.

When the Bureau of Justice Statistics collected homicidal rates from 1980 to 2008, they found that compared to Blacks, Whites were more likely to kill children, the elderly, family members, and their significant others. They commit more sex-related crimes, gang related crimes, and are more likely to kill at their places of employment.

So why does America still perpetuate the lie of Black criminality?

Is it because one in 15 Black men are in prison? That may not explain it. The racial biases in the War on Drugs contribute to the high incarceration rates. Studies show that Blacks are no more likely than Whites to use or sell drugs. Blacks actually only make up 14 percent of regular drug users. Yet Blacks are more likely to be arrested for drug crimes, and receive longer sentences than Whites.

Should we blame gangster rap with the gun-toting rappers? If so, why can’t we blame a White man with a pistol being used to symbolize Second Amendment rights?

it's black on white crime that is being ignored

our current AG will certainly not address it nor will the POTUS in fact they encourage more of it
 
No one in America is ignoring black on black crime. And no one in America will allow white racialists to use black on black crime as an excuse to ignore the lynching history of the past. Ese?
Do you ever just STFU?
Over 324,000 black on black murders in 15 years.

Fewer than 4,000 white on black lynchings in 200 years.

Case closed.
 
Black people are so dumb omg
That is what the left/"progressives" act like.
Huh bro? Nah look they are so violent let's talk about it.
Are blacks so violent? Let's talk.
Yea let's do it. Let's talk about it.
OK. Do you believe that blacks, as a whole, are violent?
The American black is not representative of blacks as a whole.
 
No one in America is ignoring black on black crime. And no one in America will allow white racialists to use black on black crime as an excuse to ignore the lynching history of the past. Ese?
Do you ever just STFU?
Over 324,000 black on black murders in 15 years.

Fewer than 4,000 white on black lynchings in 200 years.

Case closed.
That many at least since the Civil War alone.

And the comparison is immaterial. No one is ignoring the issue.
 
"The American black is not representative of blacks as a whole" is the stupid post of the day.

Just what does that mean?
 
RGS wrote, “Then try to claim that crimes by whites are some how more relevant then crimes by blacks” which are his words, not mine and not my claim.

Some claim there is no real discussion of black on black crime. Horse shit. Prove it.

You do not get rebuttal until you do all the things you want others to do. You have to prove your claim, not have others disapprove it.
 
"The American black is not representative of blacks as a whole" is the stupid post of the day.

Just what does that mean?
You think an American black is representative of black Africa?

Think dude.

The poorest blacks here are 1%ers compared to real poverty in Africa.

In Africa, survival of the fittest is in play, here, we subsidize the weakest.

I have a Nigerian friend.

He scoffs at American blacks, won't even associate with them.
 
"The American black is not representative of blacks as a whole" is the stupid post of the day.

Just what does that mean?
You think an American black is representative of black Africa?

Think dude.

The poorest blacks here are 1%ers compared to real poverty in Africa.

In Africa, survival of the fittest is in play, here, we subsidize the weakest.

I have a Nigerian friend.

He scoffs at American blacks, won't even associate with them.
DOes he date your daughter?
 
It really is a shame all the senseless killing they do to each other

But what can you do? the people in this country has tried and tried to give them a hand up. they've voted for one party for years and look where they are STILL
White males almost exclusively vote Republican and look where THEIR homicide rate STILL is! ( reference post #23) If we are both drowning a "hand up" is meaningless unless one of us has a plan to save us both.
Get on solid ground by eliminating your own (White) dire homicide statistics first before trying to attack others.
 
it's black on white crime that is being ignored

our current AG will certainly not address it nor will the POTUS in fact they encourage more of it
Wrong! That too has been rammed down our throats ad-nauseam for decades. I wonder why no AG or POTUS ever addressed it? Is it because out of a general population of between 250-300 millions the paltry 200-400 black on white homicides per year do not add up to a hill of beans? Could it be that the more pressing issue is to first get a handle on the larger numbers of Whites killing Whites and Blacks killing Blacks? No need to thank me for enlightening you... the pleasure was mine!
 
The facts are the left wants blacks dead in order to switch to a more Hispanic base, Blacks are running off South and East Asians while alienating Hispanics as well.
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
 
The facts are the left wants blacks dead in order to switch to a more Hispanic base, Blacks are running off South and East Asians while alienating Hispanics as well.
Hmmm! Asians, Jews and Hispanics joined with Blacks to help overwhelmingly elect and re-elect Obama. If what you say is true, how did THAT happen?
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
Just as do blacks when they get the chance. Ese.
 
OP is false. Thus any discussion is based on a false premise. America is well aware of black on black crime, and that crime does not excuse or make any less any other type of crime. Ese.


Just wondering if you can post some youtube vids of Jesse or Al talking about black on black crime? I'll wait- thx ese!
Why? Ese.

because you cant find anything. why? cause they are hypocrites ese. And they live next to rich white libs ese. they get rich off other peoples (blacks) misfortune ese.
There is plenty of media coverage showing Back leaders addressing black on black crime. Farakhan's Million Man March was well covered but Black Christians have made public overtures in that direction also:

Chicago Tribune

Chigago Tribune said:
Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.

The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Tribune.

The president also came here, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."

Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.

Have Riley and MacCallum and other critics publicized those events and programs? If not, why not? If so, why do they now act as though they don't exist?

Their charges have more than a whiff of condescension — implying that most blacks are unable to discern the greatest ills afflicting them. But black leaders can walk and chew gum at the same time. They can work to curb violence by blacks against blacks and also work to prevent the killing of unarmed African-Americans by police and vigilantes. Both are deeply undesirable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top