Do you know if you score too well on the cop exam you won't get the job?
I have a very high I.Q. friend who had a perfect score on the police test but was denied a job. That is discrimination, no matter how you slice it. And, on every single job I’ve ever applied for, I was asked for my race and knew that by doing so I was greatly reducing my chances at getting the job. That theory was proven correct when I reapplied for the post office, submitted my test score, but changed my race to “Native American.” I was hired after doing that. However, was laid off after 5 months by an openly racist, Black, female manager, even though all my co-workers said I was better at my job than anybody else they ever worked in (in some cases over decades).
You wrote--Jews own the movie industry. Would you agree that is due to racism, nepotism, and discrimination against Whites 9and others)? Do you think that a hashtag campaign—HollywoodTooJewish--is a legitimate and worthy cause, then, or would you claim it was Antisemitic (I suspect you would)?
Asians are also underrepresented in the CEO and executive board room ranks. They aren't smart enough to be ceos?
How many of those companies were founded by Asians? How many Asians have decades' worth of service in these organizations compared to White people? Also, less than 3 million Asians were living in the US 25 years ago when many of the people in these companies were getting their jobs and earning their experience.
The left likes to facilitate the massive expansion of non-Whites into the country by any means necessary (legally and illegally) and then when those numbers of people increase, they jump right in and start demanding that white people in any given industry are overrepresented. That's weaponized migration and deeply hostile aggression.
Why should those jobs go to Asians and Not Whites? You keep portraying Whites in jobs—any jobs-- as if it is supposed to be a bad thing, supposed to be undermined, and that they must be there undeservedly. That is your racism. I also noticed that you ONLY apply the principles of diversity against White people, never if it benefits Whites.
What is the difference between the “Full House mom,” and diversity quotas, or sports scholarships?
Non-Whites and Non-Asians get into colleges with much lower GPA and SAT scores, across the board. And even worse than that, they get into Law Schools and MEDICAL schools with much lower qualifications (to terrible real-world consequences). If your claim for the diversification of any industry is ostensibly to ensure that deserving people are given an opportunity and undeserving people are weeded out, then you must oppose racial quotas and diversity programs.
Yet, you claim they are needed. That is a contradiction. The truth is, Basketball is based on merit, and it is easy merit to see because we are able to sit back and analyze everything that happens. However, so is the boardroom, the sciences, and other high I.Q. fields. Why should that change?