Why do we Allow the Chicoms to Control Standards used in our Social Media?

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,756
2,220
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.

 
Corperations such as Google pander to China and globalist entities. Thus control is what they seek. We need a new platform that does not silence our freedoms. The FCC allows these companies to have platforms and protections as long as they do not control content. They obviously no longer deserve protections and their status needs to be revoked and the companies taxed.

Its time to remove thier 1st amendment protections as they are acting by controlling content.
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services

No one is dictating you use Facebook or twitter. If you don’t like what they’re doing, put down the phone. Go outside.
 
do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?
Neither, just break these bastards up. they became monopolies because of protections given them byu our government.

End the protections, hit them with antiTrust action, break them up and let competition solve the veracity problem.
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services

No one is dictating you use Facebook or twitter. If you don’t like what they’re doing, put down the phone. Go outside.

thanks

I dont use either and never have

JimBowie195 has the right idea

break them up
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services

No one is dictating you use Facebook or twitter. If you don’t like what they’re doing, put down the phone. Go outside.

thanks

I dont use either and never have

JimBowie195 has the right idea

break them up


So you want to use government to punish those you don’t like.

Thanks Comrade.
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services

No one is dictating you use Facebook or twitter. If you don’t like what they’re doing, put down the phone. Go outside.

thanks

I dont use either and never have

JimBowie195 has the right idea

break them up


So you want to use government to punish those you don’t like.

Thanks Comrade.

Thats what we did with Standard Oil and AT&T
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.



Government control of social media is bad so we need to have more government control to prevent government control.

Yes, it is a conundrum

do we wish to be dictated to by pointy-headed government workers or liberal transvestites at Facebook and twitter?

that is a difficult question

What I want is to expose the lib media for what they are and hope more people will turn away from their services

No one is dictating you use Facebook or twitter. If you don’t like what they’re doing, put down the phone. Go outside.

thanks

I dont use either and never have

JimBowie195 has the right idea

break them up


So you want to use government to punish those you don’t like.

Thanks Comrade.

Thats what we did with Standard Oil and AT&T


Hard to say a monopoly exists on the internet which is open to anyone.
 
Big Tech monopolies are stripping their services of any dissenting views on liberal elite establishment stands on COVID19 lockdowns, no matter what the dissenting authority is, how much fact it is based on, or how justified their opinion may be. If these Masters of the Universe deem the views to be 'harmful disinformation' then they take it down.

But how do they decide what is 'harmful disinformation'? They base it on guidelines issued by the W.H.O. the same org that defended China's lies, disinformation and coverups as the epitome of transparency, lol. Yes W.H.O. actually said that, essentially because their director has been in the Chicoms packet for decades now. He is their lap dog.

So in effect Chicoms control the W.H.O. who then provides what is considered authoritative fact for what they will allow on social media and what they will not.

China controls the standards for the USA's social media.

The only way to end that control is to break up the social media monopolies, subject them to normal tax rates and anti-trust regulations, and never again allow a handful of corporations to control 90% of our media.




Because they want to take down the West and the leftist Democratic skanks help the WHO-UN to do it alll.


They will also USHER IN this newest 911 fear factor that took our rights in many places and here we go again for some fake ass numbers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top