Homosexuality has no impact on a society. Not negative or positive unless the society makes it that way. The negative impact comes from people like you trying to eradicate or demonize it. You create conflict where there is no conflict needed.
It has "no impact on society?" The birth rate in Japan is 1.4 children per woman. For whites in America it's 1.8 children. In Europe it's also below the replacement level. That's why idiots like Merkel are trying to import large number of Muslims into Germany. We've already seen huge impacts on society. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe that having a large percentage of people declining to reproduce having no impact on society.
You've got to be ******* joking! So you solution is what? Force gays to have babies?! Do you really think our world is underpopulated?
What irony given the fact that over 70 million babies have been aborted since Roe vs Wade and given the women's lib movement (funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and helped along by the CIA) the replacement level is below that which is required to maintain our population. The U.N is only too happy to require that countries bring in migrants that didn't get the memo on birth control and the "over-population" problem liberals soil themselves over. In the meantime, we have been invaded by our friends south of the border but their weapon of choice is the uteruses of their women that are more than willing to drop anchor baby after anchor baby (of which we pay for).
As far as your comment about how we should all be accepting of homosexuality as "normal" and your view that those that see it as a perversity just haven't "evolved"? I have a question for you....will you say the same thing about the acceptance of pedophilia as "normal" should society (as we know it today) continue to "evolve"? Because the move to normalize pedophilia is going on right under our noses. The sexualization of children has been going on for some time and the selling of children for sex is third just behind the selling of drugs and military arms. The more perverse a society becomes, the more risque it becomes as well. Bripat9643 is 100 percent correct, my friend.
Don't fret over the over-population issue, the powers that be are working on that even as we speak because if anyone believes that those that control the world's monetary system of fiat currency is going to subsidize those that are not employable due to the coming robotic age and A.I???? And allow them to sit on their asses while consuming resources? Perhaps I could interest them in a bridge I have to sell in Brooklyn. Wake up, Slade because we are not in Kansas anymore.
I’m not worried about population control either way. I definitely don’t think we are underpopulated as a result of homosexuality as Bri was eluding to. That’s one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in a while.
As for accepting homosexuality, I never said anybody has to accept anything, you can do whatever you want. My point was that the stigma around homosexuality is man made. People who are born gay and trans are born that way. We as a society can choose to try and control that by shaming and demonizing and making laws to exclude them and limit their freedoms or we can understand that they aren’t hurting anybody and move forward with a live and let live attitude. The “Right” used to like the whole Liberty concept, don’t know why they flip flop on this issue.
If I don’t like eating fish because I think it tastes disgusting then I don’t eat fish but it would be stupid for me to try and ban fish so that others can’t eat it... makes no difference to me, at least it shouldn’t. If you want to ban fish or shame people for eating fish then that’s your call but it is a ridiculous viewpoint in my eyes.
Finally I get a Dale debate!!!! It’s been a while, let’s do this