Why do republicans say “Americans first” yet they reject any socialist proposal?

[Billy000]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

How about government getting the fuck out of our lives and allow us to make our own choices instead of some fucking bureaucrat making the decisions for us?

.

Not a socialist example I agree, but how specifically would more personal freedoms that what you have now improve the quality of life of Americans in general? My point is, you already have enough personal freedom in regards to finding happiness in life. More wouldn’t improve that.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Lol I hate to break it to you, but just because you agree with a government policy, it doesn’t change the fact that it is socialist.

and we've reached the pretend stage of the left wing debate.

 

[Billy000]

I mean dude this really is non sense lol. Regardless of what you think of the use of “unnamed sources”, this wouldn’t somehow affect the welfare of the American people.

sure it would, an honest press benefits all of mankind, a dishonest one brings down nations...imagine watergate without unamed sources, or your posts quoting articles that use them, it would in fact leave you with almost nothing to be embarrassed by, you would be one of the first to benefit.

Okay but the first amendment is still a fully realized thing. I mean if you are outraged by “unnamed sources”, wouldn’t it just be easier to make up your own mind about a story that has them? Even if you outlawed the media doing this (which is pretty fascist by the way), it wouldn’t somehow improve the quality of life among Americans.

 

[satrebil]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

"Why won't you pay my bills????"

FTFY.

 

[Billy000]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

"Why won't you pay my bills????"

FTFY.

What?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Not a socialist example I agree, but how specifically would more personal freedoms that what you have now improve the quality of life of Americans in general? My point is, you already have enough personal freedom in regards to finding happiness in life. More wouldn’t improve that.

And how does that differ from a tyrannic view? you admitted and are claiming that personal freedoms are not a part of socialist doctrine...it is right there in you post...can you not see why the second amendment is so troubling to the left?

 

[satrebil]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

"Why won't you pay my bills????"

FTFY.

What?

Ok, I'll make it easier - which one of your bills do you think I should pay for, and why?

 

[Billy000]

Not a socialist example I agree, but how specifically would more personal freedoms that what you have now improve the quality of life of Americans in general? My point is, you already have enough personal freedom in regards to finding happiness in life. More wouldn’t improve that.

And how does that differ from a tyrannic view? you admitted and are claiming that personal freedoms are not a part of socialist doctrine...it is right there in you post...can you not see why the second amendment is so troubling to the left?

Um how about you just list examples of personal freedoms you don’t have that you fee you MUST have. Personal freedoms that would not negatively affect society as a whole (crime)?

 

[OKTexas]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

Because the best American is one who is not a burden to any other American.

Socialist policies promote citizen's being burdens on other citizens.

Now, stay away from the well, and go play.

So why don’t you just tell me what non-socialist policies would benefit the well being of Americans?

The federal government is not intended to benefit individuals, you fucking commies have no clue what the founders intended for this country, do you? To quote the father of the Constitution:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

 

[Billy000]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

"Why won't you pay my bills????"

FTFY.

What?

Ok, I'll make it easier - which one of your bills do you think I should pay for, and why?

God you people are so dumb. You have this delusional belief that just because I am a left winger, that means I don’t pay taxes lol. It’s so stupid. Any policy funded by tax payers doesn’t somehow put you on a pedestal you dumb shit.

 

[Billy000]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

Because the best American is one who is not a burden to any other American.

Socialist policies promote citizen's being burdens on other citizens.

Now, stay away from the well, and go play.

So why don’t you just tell me what non-socialist policies would benefit the well being of Americans?

The federal government is not intended to benefit individuals, you fucking commies have no clue what the founders intended for this country, do you? To quote the father of the Constitution:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

Okay, but back to my original OP, what specific examples of non-socialist polices should we start doing? “More freedom” isn’t a solution to poverty or anything else.

 

[satrebil]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

"Why won't you pay my bills????"

FTFY.

What?

Ok, I'll make it easier - which one of your bills do you think I should pay for, and why?

God you people are so dumb. You have this delusional belief that just because I am a left winger, that means I don’t pay taxes lol. It’s so stupid. Any policy funded by tax payers doesn’t somehow put you on a pedestal you dumb shit.

Answer the question, numbnuts. What bill of yours should I pay?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Okay but the first amendment is still a fully realized thing. I mean if you are outraged by “unnamed sources”, wouldn’t it just be easier to make up your own mind about a story that has them? Even if you outlawed the media doing this (which is pretty fascist by the way), it wouldn’t somehow improve the quality of life among Americans.

It would certainly improve the lives of those the stories are meant to attack, and you cannot cherry pick the constitution and then pretend it is others who are the fascists...private gun ownership is just as important to citizens as being allowed to pretend you have a source of information when you do not and it is certainly a freedom more Americans enjoy than unnamed sources unless of course you an American who needs a bogus story to advance an agenda.
...and it would be easier if you knew a story is true then to have to pretend you know if it is or not.

 

[OKTexas]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

How about government getting the fuck out of our lives and allow us to make our own choices instead of some fucking bureaucrat making the decisions for us?

.

Not a socialist example I agree, but how specifically would more personal freedoms that what you have now improve the quality of life of Americans in general? My point is, you already have enough personal freedom in regards to finding happiness in life. More wouldn’t improve that.

Bullshit, you can't buy an automatic dishwasher that will properly dry the dishes because of energy constraints on appliances. You can't buy a toilet that will flush properly because of water usage restraints. Hell the fuckers even tried to tell us what kind of light bulbs we had to use. I could go on with many more examples of how your fucking socialist policies have removed choice from the average citizen, but frankly, you're not fucking worth the effort.

.

 

[Yarddog]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

Because the best American is one who is not a burden to any other American.

Socialist policies promote citizen's being burdens on other citizens.

Now, stay away from the well, and go play.

In every society there will be those who do need some help and propping up from time to time ( and we should always have room for kindness) but when creating that larger demographic becomes a goal of one of the political parties, in the guise of compassion, its really disingenuous at best. I think socialism only works in small or homogeneous countries where people are more or less like minded and goal oriented. Once they start to import dependent masses from some other place it will begin to fall apart quickly.

 

[OKTexas]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

Because the best American is one who is not a burden to any other American.

Socialist policies promote citizen's being burdens on other citizens.

Now, stay away from the well, and go play.

So why don’t you just tell me what non-socialist policies would benefit the well being of Americans?

The federal government is not intended to benefit individuals, you fucking commies have no clue what the founders intended for this country, do you? To quote the father of the Constitution:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

Okay, but back to my original OP, what specific examples of non-socialist polices should we start doing? “More freedom” isn’t a solution to poverty or anything else.

You want to fix poverty, look to your fucking State, that's how it's supposed to work. The federal government isn't your mommy or daddy. Hell CA claims to have a large enough surplus to give health care to illegals, but they can't even take care of their homeless citizens.

.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Um how about you just list examples of personal freedoms you don’t have that you fee you MUST have. Personal freedoms that would not negatively affect society as a whole (crime)?

billy ya completely ignored my question on how your post on socialism differs from tyranny.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

They do get that right? The most direct way to benefit the lives of Americans is through a socialist policy.

Hey, repubs, what non-socialist policy would help the well being of Americans in general besides tax cuts? Or do you think tax cuts will solve any problem?

Oh goody, I'll start. Reduce welfare, control immigration, bring back discipline, lose gay marriage, call turn-genders what they are, and regulate the web so they cannot weed out conservative views.

That and require progs like yourself serve in the military.

 

[Truth1253]

Billy000 is a wack-a-doodle don’t waste your time on her.

 

[Slade3200]

Okay but the first amendment is still a fully realized thing. I mean if you are outraged by “unnamed sources”, wouldn’t it just be easier to make up your own mind about a story that has them? Even if you outlawed the media doing this (which is pretty fascist by the way), it wouldn’t somehow improve the quality of life among Americans.

It would certainly improve the lives of those the stories are meant to attack, and you cannot cherry pick the constitution and then pretend it is others who are the fascists...private gun ownership is just as important to citizens as being allowed to pretend you have a source of information when you do not and it is certainly a freedom more Americans enjoy than unnamed sources unless of course you an American who needs a bogus story to advance an agenda.
...and it would be easier if you knew a story is true then to have to pretend you know if it is or not.

You do realize that you are calling for increased government regulation on the press, right? Aka. A socialist policy. I actually like many of your ideas, but you are kind of proving Billy’s point.