You chose to see it as defective but what if it’s a natural element of our species. A form of population control or a deeper level of connection that our society is still reluctant to understand or accept. You don’t feel what they feel and that scares you so you want to demonize and cast it out. Either way, we are the ones deciding what is right and wrong. And if the past shows us anything with how we’ve treated women, minorities, and now LGBT, we are a very flawed species but thankfully we are evolving. Some of us like yourself are just a little behind the curve.
You're just regurgitating the same dumb kneejerk arguments I already shot down. Whether it's "normal" isn't the issue. As I already pointed out, "normal" includes many things that are detrimental to the species. Death is normal. Disease is normal. Mental illness is normal. Extinction is normal. But none of those things are desirable, healthy or beneficial to the species. And neither is homosexuality. That's not just my opinion or something that "scares" me. Homosexuality is a threat to the survival of the species. It's simply a scientific fact.
You try to paint me as being driven by emotion, of being driven by fear, but it's actually you who bases your opinions on emotion. You base your claims on your desire to believe you are a good person, that you're morally superior to others. They are not based on facts or logic.
Homosexuality has no impact on a society. Not negative or positive unless the society makes it that way. The negative impact comes from people like you trying to eradicate or demonize it. You create conflict where there is no conflict needed.
It has "no impact on society?" The birth rate in Japan is 1.4 children per woman. For whites in America it's 1.8 children. In Europe it's also below the replacement level. That's why idiots like Merkel are trying to import large number of Muslims into Germany. We've already seen huge impacts on society. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe that having a large percentage of people declining to reproduce having no impact on society.
You've got to be ******* joking! So you solution is what? Force gays to have babies?! Do you really think our world is underpopulated?
What irony given the fact that over 70 million babies have been aborted since Roe vs Wade and given the women's lib movement (funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and helped along by the CIA) the replacement level is below that which is required to maintain our population. The U.N is only too happy to require that countries bring in migrants that didn't get the memo on birth control and the "over-population" problem liberals soil themselves over. In the meantime, we have been invaded by our friends south of the border but their weapon of choice is the uteruses of their women that are more than willing to drop anchor baby after anchor baby (of which we pay for).
As far as your comment about how we should all be accepting of homosexuality as "normal" and your view that those that see it as a perversity just haven't "evolved"? I have a question for you....will you say the same thing about the acceptance of pedophilia as "normal" should society (as we know it today) continue to "evolve"? Because the move to normalize pedophilia is going on right under our noses. The sexualization of children has been going on for some time and the selling of children for sex is third just behind the selling of drugs and military arms. The more perverse a society becomes, the more risque it becomes as well. Bripat9643 is 100 percent correct, my friend.
Don't fret over the over-population issue, the powers that be are working on that even as we speak because if anyone believes that those that control the world's monetary system of fiat currency is going to subsidize those that are not employable due to the coming robotic age and A.I???? And allow them to sit on their asses while consuming resources? Perhaps I could interest them in a bridge I have to sell in Brooklyn. Wake up, Slade because we are not in Kansas anymore.