Why do NRA members not support Keith Scott?

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

 

[NYcarbineer]

He be wrong color.

 

[Pop23]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

Convicted felons have no such right.

 

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

Convicted felons have no such right.

In some cases they DO have such right.
So why does NRA not support ALL legal gun ownership?

 

[martybegan]

He be wrong color.

Like this guy?

 

[The Irish Ram]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

 

[Auld Phart]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.

Might want to look up the laws regarding felons and firearms in North Carolina

 

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

 

[OKTexas]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

He was a convicted felon in possession of a gun, he was breaking the law that day. Also if the firearm was in a holster and not in his hand he wouldn't have been shot, it only takes about .4 seconds to raise a gun to a firing position.

 

[OKTexas]

He be wrong color.

Right, same color as the officer that shot him.

 

[martybegan]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

 

[whitehall]

The short answer is give the freaking system a chance to do it's freaking job before you commit arson and burglary and assault and question the NRA's motivation.

 

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.

Might want to look up the laws regarding felons and firearms in North Carolina

I did, and you are the one who is ignorant.
N.C. Supreme Court Says Some Felons Can Own Guns

 

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

Show me the evidence to support your position. I deal with facts.

 

[martybegan]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

Show me the evidence to support your position. I deal with facts.

Bullshit. I'm sure when the evidence is released you still won't believe anything that is outside of your narrative on this.

 

[PK1]

it only takes about .4 seconds to raise a gun to a firing position.

You Texans really know your guns!

 

[PK1]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

Show me the evidence to support your position. I deal with facts.

Bullshit. I'm sure when the evidence is released you still won't believe anything that is outside of your narrative on this.

Why don't you eat your own bullshit?
Why can't the Charlotte police release preliminary evidence, like their videos?

 

[martybegan]

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

Show me the evidence to support your position. I deal with facts.

Bullshit. I'm sure when the evidence is released you still won't believe anything that is outside of your narrative on this.

Why don't you eat your own bullshit?
Why can't the Charlotte police release preliminary evidence, like their videos?

Why can't you wait until everything is vetted. This is evidence in a potential criminal case, they can't release stuff willy nilly and ruin a possible prosecution.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Keith Lamont Scott had a right to carry a gun.
He was in his vehicle.
He broke no laws that day.
Police forced him out of the vehicle and shot him after he did not drop his gun.

Why does NRA not come out and support Scott's right to have a gun?

When the cops tell you 12 times to drop the gun, the NRA would most likely suggest that you drop the gun. It has nothing to do with the right to own a gun. We don't have the right to threaten cops with them.

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Blacks are shooting cops. They gave him 12 chances to drop the gun. Is there some rule that the cops have to allow the perp to shoot them first, before they can react? Don't do it Keith. Don't do it.

 

[PK1]

There is no evidence that Scott threatened the cops.

Correct that to "there is no evidence I wish to believe" and its a correct statement.

Show me the evidence to support your position. I deal with facts.

Bullshit. I'm sure when the evidence is released you still won't believe anything that is outside of your narrative on this.

Why don't you eat your own bullshit?
Why can't the Charlotte police release preliminary evidence, like their videos?

Why can't you wait until everything is vetted. This is evidence in a potential criminal case, they can't release stuff willy nilly and ruin a possible prosecution.

What prosecution? The Black officer may be charged, you think?