Why Do Democrats Want the Poor to Starve Just to Make It Easy for Illegals to Enter?

[danielpalos]

Where does it say the government will force me to pay for my neighborhoods health care?

Where does it say Democrats can use my tax dollars to commit crimes, specifically illegally rin Federal Law-violating Sanctuary Cities that provide safe haven and protection from our laws to violent illegals, human traffickers, thieves, rapists, MS13, cop killers...?

Is THAT in the 'Welfare Clause'?

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Constitution.

It protects citizens from a dangerous government yes

it is only idiot proof not wilful blindness proof since that is a moral turpitude and Bad, not Good.

Our welfare clause General must promote and provide for the general Good and not the general Bad.

Where does it say the government will force me to pay for my neighborhoods health care?

Congress is delegated the Power to Tax to solve the problems of our Republic.

No to build roads yes but put a gun to my head to pay for my neighbors healthcare

That is not for You to decide since Congress declared it to be a public Good and not a public Bad.

 

[toobfreak]

Millions could face severe cuts to food stamps due to government shutdown.

Why do the Left put illegals ahead of immigrants who follow our laws and the needs of Americans who are in need of help?

Trump ran on the wall. He was elected on it.

This nation badly wants and needs the wall.

The government has toyed with building it here and there piecemeal for years.

Democrats in years past were 100% behind it.

Trump is determined to see it through and the time is now.

Congress creates the budget. The power lies fully in Pelosi and Schumer now to create a budget to fund the wall, reopen the government and get everyone back to work.

 

[Jitss617]

Where does it say the government will force me to pay for my neighborhoods health care?

Where does it say Democrats can use my tax dollars to commit crimes, specifically illegally rin Federal Law-violating Sanctuary Cities that provide safe haven and protection from our laws to violent illegals, human traffickers, thieves, rapists, MS13, cop killers...?

Is THAT in the 'Welfare Clause'?

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

Sorry what?

 

[easyt65]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

 

[danielpalos]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

 

[Jitss617]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

 

[danielpalos]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

 

[Jitss617]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

 

[easyt65]

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy. Want to argue about it?

YES.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

You continue to disregard / ignore that the Constitution you keep referring to has been amended, and those Amendments have led to actual existing LAWS that Democrats are openly, shamelessly violating.

You seemingly want to cite the Constitution - at least the parts you believe 'make your argument' - but ignore / disregard actual existing law.

Continuing to repeat over and over ' there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization' does not change that fact.

 

[danielpalos]

there is no express immigration clause. we should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law or the concepts. you may want to use Google Translate if English is not your primary language.

 

[danielpalos]

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy. Want to argue about it?

YES.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

You continue to disregard / ignore that the Constitution you keep referring to has been amended, and those Amendments have led to actual existing LAWS that Democrats are openly, shamelessly violating.

You seemingly want to cite the Constitution - at least the parts you believe 'make your argument' - but ignore / disregard actual existing law.

Continuing to repeat over and over ' there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization' does not change that fact.

There is no express immigration clause. There is an express establishment clause for naturalization, if we need to get supreme about it.

 

[easyt65]

There is no express immigration clause. There is an express establishment clause for naturalization, if we need to get supreme about it.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

You continue to disregard / ignore that the Constitution you keep referring to has been amended, and those Amendments have led to actual existing LAWS that Democrats are openly, shamelessly violating.

You seemingly want to cite the Constitution - at least the parts you believe 'make your argument' - but ignore / disregard actual existing law.

Continuing to repeat over and over ' there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization' does not change that fact.

Thank you for making my point, that you are incapable / unwilling to have any serious discussion on this issue as you continue to run from the facts and instead are 'stuck on stupid', repeating the same now meaningless crap over and over.

Enough time has been wasted on you.....

 

[basquebromance]

if Trump's so rich, he should pay for the wall himself

 

[Jitss617]

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law or the concepts. you may want to use Google Translate if English is not your primary language.

What are you afraid of?

 

[danielpalos]

There is no express immigration clause. There is an express establishment clause for naturalization, if we need to get supreme about it.

You continue to ignore / dodge that there have been amendments to the Constitution leading to existing laws, laws that the Democrats are illegally violating and crimes they are illegally funding.

You continue to disregard / ignore that the Constitution you keep referring to has been amended, and those Amendments have led to actual existing LAWS that Democrats are openly, shamelessly violating.

You seemingly want to cite the Constitution - at least the parts you believe 'make your argument' - but ignore / disregard actual existing law.

Continuing to repeat over and over ' there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization' does not change that fact.

Thank you for making my point, that you are incapable / unwilling to have any serious discussion on this issue as you continue to run from the facts and instead are 'stuck on stupid', repeating the same now meaningless crap over and over.

Enough time has been wasted on you.....

can you cite any immigration clause in our federal Constitution?

 

[danielpalos]

lol. only the right wing never gets it.

We have a Constitution not Right Wing fantasy. There is no Express immigration clause. There is an Express establishment clause for naturalization, at the expense of any implied power available in right wing fantasy.

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law or the concepts. you may want to use Google Translate if English is not your primary language.

What are you afraid of?

you are the one with nothing but continuance, diversion and other forms of fallacies.

why be frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

 

[Jitss617]

Should I fight the law that requires me to have a licenses to fish but not enter the country? Lol

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law or the concepts. you may want to use Google Translate if English is not your primary language.

What are you afraid of?

you are the one with nothing but continuance, diversion and other forms of fallacies.

why be frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

Explain to me what you are saying in terms I can understand. Obviously you are in deep thought and aren’t explaining it properly

 

[Pumpkin Row]

What governments don't rely on capitalism to some extent? Simply using fiat money is a capital convenience.

Where does socialism work?

Every successful modern country, like Scandinavia Germany France Australia New Zealand Canada Japan..."we are all socialists now!"--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

The correct answer is that Socialism doesn't work anywhere, because of the economic calculation problem, and the fact that taxes result in diminishing returns the higher you raise them. The government has no way to measure supply and demand curves, so it results in forced rationing, causing people to get little while the government pays too much, the cost then causes the government to raise taxes, but they end up getting less money the higher they raise it, causing the government to go further and further into debt. The fact that some overbloated governments do better than other overbloated governments is not a method for claiming Socialism works, especially given its colossal number of failures. The fact that some locations have yet to collapse DUE to Socialism does not mean it's working either, especially, again, due to the numerous times it has failed throughout history. Nothing works when centrally planned, it only creates a monopoly, and the fact that government is the holder of that monopoly only makes it worse than a private monopoly(Which only forms due to government interference).

I'd also like to point out that you CLAIM that those specific locations are Socialist, however having centralized Healthcare is a Socialist component, but that doesn't make a place Socialist, Social control of the means of production does. In fact, New Zealand is economically freer than America. Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom
So are Canada and New Zealand. You're actually making an argument against Socialism.

With that, I'll give you a handy list of socialist failures:
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.

So, even if, hypothetically, you weren't being flat-out dishonest or ignorant, you'd be cherry-picking.

Those countries are communist, you brainwashed functional moron Cold War dinosaur

Socialism just means good democratic government at this point. Faire capitalism with good benefits and a good safety net. Most countries in Europe have parties called socialist that are like that. Social Democrats are the same.zzzzzzzz. Except in GOP dupe world.

Communist, as defined in the Communist Manifesto, and as practiced in the past, AND as advocated by Communists TODAY is a stateless society in which there is no currency and no government, NONE of the things which you claim are Communist are actually communist, they are the PROPERLY applied Socialism, by definition, and by the actual components of the word. Socialism is Social Control of the means of production, which all or most of the Nations you're pointing to LACK. You also failed to provide an argument against statements regarding the Economic Calculation Problem which proves that Government programs do not work, so it's nice to know that you're actually aware of that colossal problem and just don't care.

Straight-up misusing the word Socialist doesn't change it's meaning, it only means that you're ignorant or dishonest. It's a failed attempt to normalize Socialism and pretend it works, while also distancing the Socialist movement from their clear frequent failures by conflating and changing different terms. The problem you're facing here is that none of the terms you're trying to conflate actually work.

I also find it hilarious you're calling me brainwashed considering the government and the state-controlled MSM are the ones advocating for Socialism, while I've taken a position separate from the GOP and Democrat platform. The amount of self-awareness you lack is incredible, you even failed to open your argument with anything but an adhom attack.

 

[danielpalos]

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?

Not sure what you are saying can you speak in layman’s terms?

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law or the concepts. you may want to use Google Translate if English is not your primary language.

What are you afraid of?

you are the one with nothing but continuance, diversion and other forms of fallacies.

why be frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

Explain to me what you are saying in terms I can understand. Obviously you are in deep thought and aren’t explaining it properly

We have no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land; there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization at the Expense of any implied power in Right Wing fantasy.

Want to argue about it?