- Thread starter
- #21
lol why are you somehow under the impression you have a better idea of whether or not he did than me? Of course I don’t have proof. I don’t need to prove a negative, however. Someone else has to prove that he did.So you admit, you have no proof one way or another.
Why would lawyers preemptively put out information that would support their defense...thats what the courtroom is for.......unless you wish for a trial by media.....LOL
Did you even read that filing? It laid out their legal argument for the case of why it was an illegal search. Of course it would make sense to make the claim. In court is when they can prove it happened. They don’t need to wait til then to say it.