Why did Republicans/rightwing/conservatives claim that John Edwards was unfit to be POTUS?

[Synthaholic]

Winner! Great illustration of DemoKKKrat privilege and our two-tiered justice system (one for the elite left and one for everyone else).

And once again, the clueless dumbass ends up looking like a clueless dumbass.

 

[Synthaholic]

Because the precedent has already been set. They chose not to pursue the case against Edwards and yet years later, they decide to pursue a case against Trump. And, AOC is also guilty of campaign finance violations and New York isn't investigating her at all and not arresting her.

They prosecuted him. He was found not guilty in a court of law. They declined to re-prosecute him, accepting the jury decision.

You should quit while you're...well, not ahead, but at least not looking like a dumbfuck hack like marvin martian

 

[Synthaholic]

And, AOC is also guilty of campaign finance violations and New York isn't investigating her at all and not arresting her.

But...but...AOC!!!1!!

 

[Independentthinker]

They prosecuted him. He was found not guilty in a court of law. They declined to re-prosecute him, accepting the jury decision.

You should quit while you're...well, not ahead, but at least not looking like a dumbfuck hack like marvin martian

As I said, the precedent has already been set that using campaign finance law money is not a criminal offense. So, why are trying it yet again after the precedent has already been set for the very same offense? And, AOC is also guilty of campaign finance laws. Why isn't New York investigating her or going to arrest her?

 

[Independentthinker]

But...but...AOC!!!1!!

View attachment 768473

Glad you see the hypocrisy.

 

[Synthaholic]

As I said, the precedent has already been set that using campaign finance law money is not a criminal offense.

Are you a moron? Are you? They prosecuted Edwards. Because it's a criminal offense. They didn't prosecute him for his affair.

 

[marvin martian]

And once again, the clueless dumbass ends up looking like a clueless dumbass.

Yes, you did. Of course.

 

[marvin martian]

Are you a moron? Are you? They prosecuted Edwards. Because it's a criminal offense. They didn't prosecute him for his affair.

This is like the lie you keep telling that Bill Clinton was impeached "because of a blowjob". You're as dishonest as you are stupid.

 

[Independentthinker]

Are you a moron? Are you? They prosecuted Edwards. Because it's a criminal offense. They didn't prosecute him for his affair.

Are you a moron? Cases set legal precedent. The Edwards case was exactly the same as Trump's and was prosecuted and led to nothing with the DOJ deciding not to continue. That is the precedent, of which lefty New Yorkers want to go against precedent when it comes to Trump. New York is also refusing to investigate AOC or arrest her for the very same thing, campaign finance law violations.

 

[BackAgain]

Maybe a Republican will come along and refresh my memory. After all, elephants never forget.

But jackasses bray.

 

[Synthaholic]

Yes, you did. Of course.

You're no match for me, angry toddler.

 

[Synthaholic]

Are you a moron? Cases set legal precedent. The Edwards case was exactly the same as Trump's and was prosecuted and led to nothing with the DOJ deciding not to continue. That is the precedent, of which lefty New Yorkers want to go against precedent when it comes to Trump. New York is also refusing to investigate AOC or arrest her for the very same thing, campaign finance law violations.

No, the precedent is prosecuting the crime.

 

[Independentthinker]

No, the precedent is prosecuting the crime.

Maybe you can link to where New York State has arrested AOC and is prosecuting her for her crime of campaign finance violations.