Why did Obama and Hillary Clinton attack Libya?

And now Libya has the largest out door slave market

Thanks Obama
That already existed. Maybe you should go read up. Libya was already not a sovereign country, by the time this happened. Qhaddafi had control only of the coastal areas where his military existed.
 
That already existed. Maybe you should go read up. Libya was already not a sovereign country, by the time this happened. Qhaddafi had control only of the coastal areas where his military existed.
Why didn’t Obama stop it with his war??
 
I believe Libya was planning to introduce the Gold Dinar and Libya was very rich in Gold, i believe that was one of many reasons, those bastards have been carrying out war crimes for years, that Bitch Clinton laughed like a maniac when told of the Gaddafi killing, pure evil.

I belive you belive all kinds of baselss bullshit.

Gaddafi was a murderous dictator, got everything he deserved.
 
I believe Libya was planning to introduce the Gold Dinar and Libya was very rich in Gold, i believe that was one of many reasons, those bastards have been carrying out war crimes for years, that Bitch Clinton laughed like a maniac when told of the Gaddafi killing, pure evil.
What's fake news Anton?
 
I belive you belive all kinds of baselss bullshit.

Gaddafi was a murderous dictator, got everything he deserved.
You bastards love murderous dictators as long as they are your murderous dictators, and International Law doesn't mean a damn thing to you, well you chose the law of the jungle so don't start crying when that's what you get.
 
That NATO involvement had anything to do with Lybia's finances, you just belive whatever the f you want to.
So what did NATO involvement have to do with the Libya attack, other than supporting head hacking terrorists to destroy the Country and overthrow Gaddafi? now it's a mad max nightmare, the terrorists you supported even killed your man Stevens in Bangazi after he was raped, that's the problem when you support Islamist terrorists you can't control Frankenstein
 
So what did NATO involvement have to do with the Libya attack, other than supporting head hacking terrorists to destroy the Country and overthrow Gaddafi? now it's a mad max nightmare, the terrorists you supported even killed your man Stevens in Bangazi after he was raped, that's the problem when you support Islamist terrorists you can't control Frankenstein

Helping internal Libyan forces remove a murderous dictator...duh?

NATO's involvement was limited and narrowly limited to airial strikes, the rest was up to Libyans.
 
If I remember correctly, it was France and Britain (namely, Sarkozy and Cameron) who advocated the most for military campaign against Gaddafi. In fact, it was supposed that these two countries should have been the main driving force of this campaign, and American troops would have only an assisting role. Of course, this didn't work out.

Some people said that European establishment (especially in France) had had financial connections to the Gaddafi regime. Or more correctly, he was giving them money for their campaigns and other things in exchange for 'better relations'. They decides to flush him when he became a threat.
 
That already existed. Maybe you should go read up. Libya was already not a sovereign country, by the time this happened. Qhaddafi had control only of the coastal areas where his military existed.
Stop making excuses for barbarism, there was no slave market before the war, Libya was tribal and that is what the US and it's European puppets exploited.
 


NATO didn’t bomb or attack ANYONE. The UN asked for force to help dislodge Khadafi with a minimal loss of life.

We all know this was an unjust war and now Libya is the #1 s
ave naton on earth.

What was the excuse to collapse Libya?
What was the real reason?
Is that country now better off than before Obama invaded?

Hillary tried to push the lie of Trump claiming violence if he does not get elected.

He was talking about an econmic bloodbath for the auto industry.

Here is a mash of of talking heads using BLOODBATH many times to refer to econmic situations.



Once again, nothing but lies from the left.


Try getting the facts instead of the Russian propaganda version. Qaddafi was a despot and a murderer.
 
We all know this was an unjust war and now Libya is the #1 s
ave naton on earth.

What was the excuse to collapse Libya?
What was the real reason?
Is that country now better off than before Obama invaded?

Hillary tried to push the lie of Trump claiming violence if he does not get elected.

He was talking about an econmic bloodbath for the auto industry.

Here is a mash of of talking heads using BLOODBATH many times to refer to econmic situations.



Once again, nothing but lies from the left.

Because Libya was run by a local hero who cared deeply about the people he lead and told Western bankers to GFY
 
NATO didn’t bomb or attack ANYONE. The UN asked for force to help dislodge Khadafi with a minimal loss of life.



Try getting the facts instead of the Russian propaganda version. Qaddafi was a despot and a murderer.
Who told you that? there was no UN mandate for Regime change, stop spinning bullshit to back up your argument, even if he was a despot who gave NATO authorisation to destroy the Country and murder Gaddafi? you just love your Islamist head hacking proxies as long as they chop other peoples heads off.
 
If I remember correctly, it was France and Britain (namely, Sarkozy and Cameron) who advocated the most for military campaign against Gaddafi. In fact, it was supposed that these two countries should have been the main driving force of this campaign, and American troops would have only an assisting role. Of course, this didn't work out.

Some people said that European establishment (especially in France) had had financial connections to the Gaddafi regime. Or more correctly, he was giving them money for their campaigns and other things in exchange for 'better relations'. They decides to flush him when he became a threat.
Yes the French and British were the main instigators, look at this vid, these are the filth the west supported in Libya for Regime change, here they are smashing up a WW2 British and Comonwealth war graves cemetery, these men died fighting Rommel's Afrika Korps, the problem is when you support rabid dogs they can turn on you, like they did in Manchester when a anti Gaddafi Islamist terrorist suicide bomber blew up a load of kids at the Manchester Arena.
 
NATO didn’t bomb or attack ANYONE. The UN asked for force to help dislodge Khadafi with a minimal loss of life.



Try getting the facts instead of the Russian propaganda version. Qaddafi was a despot and a murderer.
NATO didn't bomb anyone :abgg2q.jpg: so who the hell bombed Sirte Gadaffis home town?
1732912381007.webp
 
Yes the French and British were the main instigators, look at this vid, these are the filth the west supported in Libya for Regime change, here they are smashing up a WW2 British and Comonwealth war graves cemetery, these men died fighting Rommel's Afrika Korps, the problem is when you support rabid dogs they can turn on you, like they did in Manchester when a anti Gaddafi Islamist terrorist suicide bomber blew up a load of kids at the Manchester Arena.

These guys didn't care. They just decided to get rid of their money lender who might have decided to exploit his 'special status'.
 
there was no slave market before the war
Wrong, of course.

It's just that there is now more freedom of press in chaotic Libya, since Ghaddafi is gone.

You didn't know this, because you don't know much about any of this at all. You just saw a video from 2018 and started pretending to care. As propagandists will do.

And as you are often apt to do, you decided to pull a lie right out of your ass.

"
Migrant Sales Under Gaddafi

While CNN was able to document a few clandestine “slave auctions” in post-Gaddafi Libya, while Gaddafi ruled-nighttime slave auctions were common."

 
Last edited:
Wrong, of course.

It's just that there is now more freedom of press in chaotic Libya, since Ghaddafi is gone.

You didn't know this, because you don't know much about any of this at all. You just saw a video from 2018 and started pretending to care. As propagandists will do.

And as you are often apt to do, you decided to pull a lie right out of your ass.

"
Migrant Sales Under Gaddafi

While CNN was able to document a few clandestine “slave auctions” in post-Gaddafi Libya, while Gaddafi ruled-nighttime slave auctions were common."

Fake news, what does it feel like to support Islamist head hackers all over the World as your proxy army?
 
Back
Top Bottom