candycorn
Diamond Member
Utah is an authoritarian regime? Who knew?No that's more evidence of the fraud that occurred. Mail-in ballots are for authoritarian regimes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Utah is an authoritarian regime? Who knew?No that's more evidence of the fraud that occurred. Mail-in ballots are for authoritarian regimes.
What did Sussman supposedly lie about?
He contacted the FBI about suspicious activity in two servers in Trump Tower that were communicating almost exclusively with AlfaBank in Russia. That's it. They investigated ad were unable to find anything. That did NOT lead to any other investigations and had nothing to do with Carter page or anything else.
He claimed to be doing so as a concerned private citizen and the Durham crew noted that he was at that time in the employ of the Clinton Campaign and his failure to say so amounted to lying.
That remains to be seen (in a court of law if this gets prosecuted) but that's ALL that Durham found.
Funny part is the Left was the side that complained about mail in fraud not too long ago. Once again, no moral compass or ethics, so what they complained about a few years ago as against democracy they are for today, because it seems to give them an advantage by making election fraud easier. Democrats are the election fraud masters.Wow, this shit again?
Okay...again....multiple states; red and blue alike....have been doing mail in voting for several elections. All voters on the voting rolls are mailed a ballot. They can fill it out and return it or they can simply discard it.
Never, not once, has any of you idiots who are screaming about mail in voting being subject to greater fraud ever uttered a syllable in protest of those elections or the candidates who these states have been electing. There has not been any greater amount of voter fraud in these states either.
The only reason you folks are screaming about it now is because your blob got his ass kicked so thoroughly in the last election and you are looking to latch on to any excuse available. The blob has stated there was voter fraud in 3 elections...never, not once has any proof of significant voter fraud been found in any of those elections.
Looks like what I posted went over your head, once again, mail-in ballots are banned by most of the civilized nations due to a history of voter / election fraud. Which is why Democrats like you love mail-in ballots.Utah is an authoritarian regime? Who knew?
Place your bets. Grand jury found him lying. Durham is very deliberate doesn't care about political timelines, there will be more heads to roll and it could go all the way to Hillary and higher.
Now if you could only find some proof of massive fraud...you may have a leg to stand on instead of just looking stupid.Funny part is the Left was the side that complained about mail in fraud not too long ago. Once again, no moral compass or ethics, so what they complained about a few years ago as against democracy they are for today, because it seems to give them an advantage by making election fraud easier. Democrats are the election fraud masters.
Looks like what I posted went over your head, once again, mail-in ballots are banned by most of the civilized nations due to a history of voter / election fraud. Which is why Democrats like you love mail-in ballots.
It's actually a done deal, question is will he turn in others in exchange for leniency or not.Keep us posted on that sport.
so there was fraud but not "massive", because you guys are used to fraud occurring on the Left, and massive fraud hasn't been found...YET.Now if you could only find some proof of massive fraud...you may have a leg to stand on instead of just looking stupid.
Read this again.The Democratic Party in Utah is almost non existent; much like your IQ. Yet somehow Utah and about 15% of the nation uses mail in ballots and there has never been any massive voter fraud.
Again...you're just making stuff up sport.
There's a few cases of fraud in most elections. And it's committed by Republicans and Democrats and Independents.so there was fraud but not "massive", because you guys are used to fraud occurring on the Left, and massive fraud hasn't been found...YET.
It's actually a done deal, question is will he turn in others in exchange for leniency or not.
Lawyer who allegedly advised Clinton campaign charged with lying to FBI in tip about possible Trump-Russia bank link
The indictment of Michael Sussmann relates to a tip he gave the FBI in 2016, when Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton competed for the White House.www.cnbc.com
The indictment says that beginning in July 2016, Sussmann worked with the tech executive, other cyber-researchers, and an American investigative firm to assemble data and documents that Sussman later gave the FBI and media.
“The technology executive, for his part, exploited his access to non-public data at multiple internet companies and enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract designed to identify the perpetrators of malicious cyber-attacks and protect U.S. national security,” Durham’s office said.
The indictment charges that those researchers mined that data “to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ that would tie then-presidential candidate Donald Trump to Russia, and which the executive believed would please certain ‘VIPs,’” Durham’s office said.
Sussmann, his law firm and the technology executive also allegedly coordinated with members of Clinton’s campaign in those efforts, according to the indictment.
Durham’s office noted in its statement that after getting Sussmann’s tip, “The FBI ultimately determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations of a secret communications channel between the Trump Organization and the Russia-based bank.”
Sussmann is due to appear in court as soon
There is a certain amount of what can be called "fraud" in every election. You guys have never proven any massive fraud in any of the 3 elections your blob swears he was the victim of fraud.so there was fraud but not "massive", because you guys are used to fraud occurring on the Left, and massive fraud hasn't been found...YET.
Read this again.
Voting Fraud Is a Real Concern. Just Look Around the World
If concern about voter fraud with mail-in ballots is delusional, it is a delusion that is shared by most of the world.www.newsweek.com
Here is what we found. Besides the United States, there are 36 member states in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Forty-seven percent ban mail-in voting unless the citizen is living abroad, and 30 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Fourteen percent of the countries ban mail-in voting even for those living abroad.
In addition, some countries that allow voting by mail for some citizens living in the country don't allow it for everyone. For example, Japan and Poland have limited mail-in voting for those who have special certificates verifying that they are disabled. France has made an exception this year to its ban on mail-in ballots to those who are sick or at particular risk during the coronavirus pandemic. Poland will allow mail-in ballots for everyone for this year only.
****And this, then you will be quizzed.
Developed countries ‘ban’ mail-in voting, US would be ‘laughing stock’: Report
Most developed countries, especially in Europe, ban mail-in voting to fight vast fraud and vote buying that had threatened the integrity of their elections, according to an exhaustive review of voting rules and histories in over 30 major nations.
The following from the article applies to Leftards like Candy Commie.
“Liberals and progressives often try to model the U.S. on Western European countries in many ways, but you never hear them arguing that we should adopt their voting rules. There is a reason for that. Banning mail-in voting or requiring people to use photo IDs to obtain a mail-in ballot is quite common in developed countries, especially in Europe,” he said in the report.
Right, so now that it's a Democrat under the gun, you don't trust the FBI and it's prosecutors, and let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Doesn't seem to bother you that we might have someone involved in a criminal conspiracy sent as an emissary of the Hillary Clinton campaign to lie to the FBI. The anything goes Democrat Party.
Nothing on the scale of what Democrats do. Acorn was massive fraud, but it was brushed off. There was even massive fraud by Democrats in the 2016 election, but not enough or as enough to do the kind of fraud millions of mail-in ballots would do.There is a certain amount of what can be called "fraud" in every election. You guys have never proven any massive fraud in any of the 3 elections your blob swears he was the victim of fraud.
Right, so now that it's a Democrat under the gun, you don't trust the FBI and it's prosecutors, and let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Doesn't seem to bother you that we might have someone involved in a criminal conspiracy sent as an emissary of the Hillary Clinton campaign to lie to the FBI. The anything goes Democrat Party.
Nothing on the scale of what Democrats do. Acorn was massive fraud, but it was brushed off. There was even massive fraud by Democrats in the 2016 election, but not enough or as enough to do the kind of fraud millions of mail-in ballots would do.
The Acorn Indictments - WSJ
www.wsj.com
Acorn and its affiliates have pulled some real stunts in recent years. In Ohio in 2004, a worker for one affiliate was given crack cocaine in exchange for fraudulent registrations that included underage voters, dead voters and pillars of the community named Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy and Jive Turkey. During a Congressional hearing in Ohio in the aftermath of the 2004 election, officials from several counties in the state explained Acorn's practice of dumping thousands of registration forms in their lap on the submission deadline, even though the forms had been collected months earlier.
"You have to wonder what's the point of that, if not to overwhelm the system and get phony registrations on the voter rolls," says Thor Hearne of the American Center for Voting Rights, who also testified at the hearing. "These were Democratic officials saying that they felt their election system in Ohio was under assault by these kinds of efforts to game the system."
Given this history, it's not surprising that Acorn is so hostile to voter identification laws and other efforts to ensure fairness and accuracy at the polls. In Missouri last month, the state Supreme Court held that a photo ID requirement to vote was overly burdensome and a violation of the state constitution. Acorn was behind the original suit challenging the statute, and it has brought similar challenges in several other states, including Ohio.