Why Confront Islam?

[Taz]

Where can I find these "natural rights"?

You and monk will discover them when they are taken away and not one moment sooner. Some people are that way.

Taken away by whom?

Men.

Which rights?

It has been called by many things in the past. The Law of Right and Wrong, Natural Law, etc.

You should look it up. Check out legal positivism as well.

So you have nothing. Got it.

 

[Taz]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

 

[ding]

" Semantic Hubris "

* Pretentious Validity Based On Self Exception *

Taken away by whom?

The premises for " inalienable rites " is that the rites are intrinsic with a wanton , or a " natural " , desire for particular civil liberties .

The presumption for " natural rites " is absurd because the civil liberties can be alienated and a wanton desire for them includes no greater validity than a wanton desire for some other to remove them .

When hue mammon attempts to apply the standard of " inalienable rites " to animals based upon their wanton desire , the absurdity of " natural rites " becomes evident .

The tenets of creed by fictional ishmaelism violate non aggression principles however , as with many promoting " natural rites " , a wanton desire for civil liberties must also meet its " morality standards " to be consistent with a subjective criteria of " natural " .

Seriously brah, learn some proper English. I have no idea what you're talking about.

He’s saying natural rights are not God given.

 

[ding]

You and monk will discover them when they are taken away and not one moment sooner. Some people are that way.

Taken away by whom?

Men.

Which rights?

It has been called by many things in the past. The Law of Right and Wrong, Natural Law, etc.

You should look it up. Check out legal positivism as well.

So you have nothing. Got it.

I have it. You don’t.

 

[ding]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

 

[Taz]

Taken away by whom?

Men.

Which rights?

It has been called by many things in the past. The Law of Right and Wrong, Natural Law, etc.

You should look it up. Check out legal positivism as well.

So you have nothing. Got it.

I have it. You don’t.

Then provide a proper link.

 

[Taz]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

 

[there4eyeM]

" Semantic Hubris "

* Pretentious Validity Based On Self Exception *

Taken away by whom?

The premises for " inalienable rites " is that the rites are intrinsic with a wanton , or a " natural " , desire for particular civil liberties .

The presumption for " natural rites " is absurd because the civil liberties can be alienated and a wanton desire for them includes no greater validity than a wanton desire for some other to remove them .

When hue mammon attempts to apply the standard of " inalienable rites " to animals based upon their wanton desire , the absurdity of " natural rites " becomes evident .

The tenets of creed by fictional ishmaelism violate non aggression principles however , as with many promoting " natural rites " , a wanton desire for civil liberties must also meet its " morality standards " to be consistent with a subjective criteria of " natural " .

Seriously brah, learn some proper English. I have no idea what you're talking about.

He’s saying natural rights are not God given.

Rather, he seems, justifiably, to be calling into question the concept of "natural rights". Related is the inherent contention that 'God' provided this condition.

 

[ding]

" Semantic Hubris "

* Pretentious Validity Based On Self Exception *

Taken away by whom?

The premises for " inalienable rites " is that the rites are intrinsic with a wanton , or a " natural " , desire for particular civil liberties .

The presumption for " natural rites " is absurd because the civil liberties can be alienated and a wanton desire for them includes no greater validity than a wanton desire for some other to remove them .

When hue mammon attempts to apply the standard of " inalienable rites " to animals based upon their wanton desire , the absurdity of " natural rites " becomes evident .

The tenets of creed by fictional ishmaelism violate non aggression principles however , as with many promoting " natural rites " , a wanton desire for civil liberties must also meet its " morality standards " to be consistent with a subjective criteria of " natural " .

Seriously brah, learn some proper English. I have no idea what you're talking about.

He’s saying natural rights are not God given.

Rather, he seems, justifiably, to be calling into question the concept of "natural rights". Related is the inherent contention that 'God' provided this condition.

Of course God did. Who else willed the laws of nature into existence.

Everything is connected and works together to propel us forward. Diversity is a critical component of the conflict and confusion process that we find ourselves in.

Natural laws exist in and of themselves and are discovered during the conflict and confusion process. It’s all very Darwinian.

The truth will always rise to the top eventually. Why? Because error cannot stand. Eventually error fails. It’s the whole normalization of deviance thingee.

Standards exist for a reason. When we deviate from the standard and normalize the deviance from the standard and accept a new lower standard predictable surprises will eventually occur. This is error failing.

 

[ding]

The universe is constantly providing feedback. At any point in time we are the sum of our choices.

How is it that ancient man understood these things and we don’t?

 

[ding]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

 

[Taz]

The universe is constantly providing feedback. At any point in time we are the sum of our choices.

How is it that ancient man understood these things and we don’t?

And why should we confront Islam over this?

 

[Taz]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

It's your claim, you own it. And have no link for it. And you own that as well.

 

[ding]

Of course it is our natural rights which sets us apart.

Why? Because they are logical and we are beings that know and create. We are unlike any other.

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

It's your claim, you own it. And have no link for it. And you own that as well.

Try using google.

 

[Taz]

You can't even say what those natural rights are. Now stfu.

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

It's your claim, you own it. And have no link for it. And you own that as well.

Try using google.

It's your lack of link, you own it.

 

[ding]

The universe is constantly providing feedback. At any point in time we are the sum of our choices.

How is it that ancient man understood these things and we don’t?

And why should we confront Islam over this?

Why would I want to do that? I don’t attack the faith of others like you and a few others do.

I accept the conflict and confusion process for what it is.

I have faith that everything will work itself out as it should.

 

[ding]

Look it up for yourself.

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

It's your claim, you own it. And have no link for it. And you own that as well.

Try using google.

It's your lack of link, you own it.

Like I said before, do your own research. I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

 

[Taz]

The universe is constantly providing feedback. At any point in time we are the sum of our choices.

How is it that ancient man understood these things and we don’t?

And why should we confront Islam over this?

Why would I want to do that? I don’t attack the faith of others like you and a few others do.

I accept the conflict and confusion process for what it is.

I have faith that everything will work itself out as it should.

It's the thread you're ranting in.

 

[Taz]

You made the claim, now back it up with a proper link, if you even have one.

Do your own research.

I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

It's your claim, you own it. And have no link for it. And you own that as well.

Try using google.

It's your lack of link, you own it.

Like I said before, do your own research. I don’t care if you remain ignorant.

So you have nothing, you own that too.

 

[danielpalos]

True Men of Religion, cannot blame women for their lack of moral virtue.