Why Charlie Kirk had to die, and why he has shown us the path forward

Last edited:
She's too old fer that, try again.
Too old to be full of hate?

She's been toxically full of hate and bile for a decade now.

She's marinated in hate, dehydrated, and she's become old crone hate jerky. (patent pending)
 
Yet EU and the rest of the first wold have less people in Prison
The rest of the world does not have a Second Amendment protecting their right to keep firearms.

...Not Death Penalty...
More fool they...

Common Sense Gun laws
Yes... that would be good... but that will probably require repealing the Second and replacing it with something else.
And have way less gun crime and Mass Murders...
The only way to reduce gun-crime/.mass-murder in light of the Second Amendment is to reinstate and use the Death Penalty.
You premise is bullshit and you think the problem is that you can't double and triple down...
It's time to find out which one of us is right...

If, after executing a few thousand murderers, the rate still hasn't gone down in a generation or so, I'll concede... :cool:


US has been putting over million people in prison and still lags way behind Rest of first world with crime..
We aren't executing murderers nationwide and rapidly... it's time to change that... and give it a generation-or-so to work...
 
The Left apparently has an unbeatable strategy......
If they can't buy, steal or win elections......kill all those who oppose.

If anyone knows ANY way to deal with this please say so.
(But please don't post your fantasies about resistance you damn well know is never gonna happen, k?)

I doubt Trump will be allowed to finish a 3rd year of his term.
You know damn well they are going to keep trying until they succeed.

Then what? Yep..thoughts and prayers.
 
Your premise is bullshit - correlation doesn't prove causation.

Oh, shit - I better be careful!
I don't agree with you on gun control; according to your posts that's sufficient to justify my murder.
Problem is I have how many countries with lower crime rates...

We can show statistics all day and it won't matter cause you have a blinkered view...

1757644247002.webp


The Good guy with a gun is generally a fallacy...
 
Admitting to the inside job?!
Whatever conspiracy theory makes you the happiest dolt.

Do you at least admit he was shot this time unlike Trump whom you all think was staged?
 
Here is an idea, why don't you take your antisemitism and go soil another thread?
Here’s an idea, why don’t you get an education you mental midget.

Did you kill Charlie?
 
Make no mistake about it, the assassination of Charlie Kirk was a professional hit, unlike the other assassination attempts that tried to murder the three branches of government, as a lone gunman tried to assassinate the entire GOP, a conservative Supreme Court Justice, and Trump himself, more than once. No, the gunman was a professional that could be seen camouflaged on a roof top recorded by students using their cell phones, and it was a kill shot making sure there was no chance to revive him. That is why the killer will never be found. The only question becomes, who paid the assassin? George Soros? Who knows, and we will never know, much like we will never know where half the money flowed to from USAID.

But why was Charlie sooooo much more of a threat to the point that the Left needed to hire a professional? It was because the man was a political genius, having never graduated college and simply attaining high political influence through his own ability to learn on his own, aside from the indoctrination centers of the average American university where students are all taught how wonderful socialism and abortion and gender and race theory really is. But worse than that, he was a conservative Christian with charisma, attracting larger and larger crowds at these state run university indoctrination centers, and he was young which meant he would use this for generations to come. But even more than that, Charley had courage, something the Left is terrified of because they know without it, they are unstoppable. He would often tell guests with him that if they did not feel safe, they did not have to go out on that stage with him. Like Doctor King who was also assassinated for his political activism, I think Charlie knew that he would not be long for this world

Being a political genius, Charley saw the need to reach out to kids who had been indoctrinated by the state their whole lives to embrace socialism and the Left via the public education system and Legacy media, and isolated from other political views that might challenge this indoctrination. So, Charley went into these hot beds of Marxism to proclaim his views and the views of what founded the United States declaring the need to protect our Bill of Rights from the Left, everything from the freedom of speech to the freedom to bear arms. And make no mistake about it, Charley had to die via a gun shot, using the very Constitutional right to end his life to send a message to us all.

The response, therefore, should be to follow Charlie. The response should be to continue to walk into the hot beds of hate at these local universities, where the Presidents of the universities turn a blind eye to students chasing Jewish students into the attics of universities as they stand around singing "Gas the Jews", and stand there with courage and a smile on your face being to articulate why their state run education has become indoctrination, and why it should be challenged using critical thinking.

So, for every Charly Kirk that is gunned down, five more need to take his place. And when the five are gunned down, 20 more need to take his place. And when those 20 are gunned down, a thousand need to take his place. The only criteria will be courage and not lowering themselves to the hate and murder of the Left as we continue to hit college after college after college. If we do this, the country wins. But to turn down the road of the assassin to respond like the Left, we lose. It is a path the Left constantly tries to pull us down. But guess what, those that oppose them really are better than that I believe.

And I just have to thank the man who showed us the path forward, Charley Kirk.

Thanks man.

View attachment 1160633
I think it's becoming obvious that the shooter had no problem with the second amendment, his problem was Charlie Kirk's position on transsexuality and his ability to carry the message en masse.
 
Last edited:
Well, if the conclusion was a professional hitman, then the question would be, who paid him? Soros? Doubt it.

When they catch him, he'll be a well educated person, but not a professional hitman, imo.
He was definitely an amateur and we have info that he is Skye Valadaz a trans fake female
1757677724164.webp
 
15th post
I think it's becoming obvious that the shooter had no problem with the second amendment, his problem was Charlie Kirk's position on transsexuality and his ability to carry the message en masse.
Yeah, these dimtards whine about owning guns yet they do all the murdering with them.....
 
Yeah, these dimtards whine about owning guns yet they do all the murdering with them.....
There are a surprising number of people who identify as left wing who also own and love their guns. I believe it's only a small percentage of progressives who are anti-gun radicals. That's one of the reasons they are unable to get the legislation they want. This is one subject the left is well divided on with those who are pro gun staying silent for fear of being ostracized. There are a number of left-wingers here on this board who have admitted to having firearms and a permit and who have mentioned time and again that they are regular at the range.
 
There are a surprising number of people who identify as left wing who also own and love their guns. I believe it's only a small percentage of progressives who are anti-gun radicals. That's one of the reasons they are unable to get the legislation they want. This is one subject the left is well divided on with those who are pro gun staying silent for fear of being ostracized. There are a number of left-wingers here on this board will have admitted to having firearms and a permit and who have mentioned time and again that they are regular at the range.
I was hoping someone would point out that very fact...thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom