Oh no.. the some of the MSM is figuring out that their after election credibility is on the line and they must report this story. I doubt CBS wants their anonymous source to go to another network and tell them that CBS knew and sat on the story.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet the emails show the video had nothing to do with it. You know, the emails that the White House and the State Department had seen.At least we don't believe it was about a years-old YouTube video. Talk about fantasy...They are a bunch of loons, one even used a video game to show the capabilities of a gunship! This is the fantasy land these dolts live in!!!![]()
It's not like ALL OVER the area, people were getting all SUPER mad about that same years-old youtube video. I mean, if THAT happened, it'd almost be like such a story in the same region would be, plausible or something.
I stand corrected.As I believe I've already said, there are no secondary explosions from Vulcan rounds. They're kinetic-kill, not explosive.You don't seem to know how bullets flying from a vulcan cannon work. Or the secondary explosions, invading another nation's airspace with a war plane, etc...
There would be secondaries had they been used to take out the mortar that killed Woods.
The point about the Gau-12 is the inherent inaccuracy, as shown in the video with rounds peppering in the general vicinity. Also, you're wrong on the explosion part- it can fire HEI and API. Pretty sure you can see the little explosions in the videos.
And yet the emails show the video had nothing to do with it. You know, the emails that the White House and the State Department had seen.At least we don't believe it was about a years-old YouTube video. Talk about fantasy...
It's not like ALL OVER the area, people were getting all SUPER mad about that same years-old youtube video. I mean, if THAT happened, it'd almost be like such a story in the same region would be, plausible or something.
Yeah, I'm gonna have to defer to the people who were actually there, not the people desperate to spin the results to make their guy look good.And yet the emails show the video had nothing to do with it. You know, the emails that the White House and the State Department had seen.It's not like ALL OVER the area, people were getting all SUPER mad about that same years-old youtube video. I mean, if THAT happened, it'd almost be like such a story in the same region would be, plausible or something.
The emails weren't their sole source of intelligence dude. Parts of the information they provided in those very emails were incorrect in themselves- they aren't some infallible source of information on what happened.
1. It demonstrates the failure of our appeasement towards hostile Muslim countries.
2. It demonstrates the unconscionable elevation of politics over protection of American citizens.
3. It demonstrates pervasive corruption/coverup throughout the Executive Branch of our government.
4. It demonstrates the pervasive corruption of journalism in our mainstream media.
5. It demonstrates the corruption of political partisans who support their candidate no matter what harm is done to their country.
When you read the article it's apparent that no one had a clue what to do. This is why we need a leader in the Whitehouse.
When you read the article it's apparent that no one had a clue what to do. This is why we need a leader in the Whitehouse.
Obama is way too supportive of the radical Muslims. He has yet to openly condemn them.
When you read the article it's apparent that no one had a clue what to do. This is why we need a leader in the Whitehouse.
Obama is way too supportive of the radical Muslims. He has yet to openly condemn them.
He is a radical Muslim at heart, always apologizing.... I want to vomit!!!
The embarrassing thing for the "journalists" of the Main Stream Media is that Fox News is the only news outlet reporting on the murder of our Ambassador and the three others. How can this be a "non-story" unless you're so in the tank for Barack Obama that you're willing to put blinders on and ignore what's right in front of your face?
Funny I never listen to or watch what they call news on Faux and I've known about the 4 Americans killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi since the day it happened? You must mean that since the other networks aren't allowing monday morning quaterbacks to endlessly speculate 24/7 about how badly the Obama administration handled the attack and aftermath then yeah I'm sure they're sooooo embarrassed.![]()
Oh, you mean initially questioning the reasons for the attack is Monday morning quarterbacking, especially when your "Dear One" can't keep the lie together? First it was a mob riot for nearly a week, then the partial truth that it was a coordinated attack by al-Qaeda terrorist with heavy machine guns, mortars and RPG's. Now through "Monday Morning" investigation we are finding that Obama and company were aware of the impending attack told to them by one of the victims of the attack. So according to you that August confrence was the decision point that the lives of the thirty people was not worth beefing up the security with Marines and in fact the decision was made to reduce whatever security assets they had further. Good logic. Sounds more like a decision Hitler would have made when his troops were surrounded