Why are Progressives afraid to address MENTAL ILLNESS AND MASS MURDER?
Is the Mental Illness lobby preventing Progressives from addressing the REAL CAUSE OF MASS MURDER?
POSTED ON AUGUST 7, 2019 BY
PAUL MIRENGOFF IN
CRIME,
FIREARMS,
HEALTH CARE
MENTAL ILLNESS AND MASS MURDER
The left wants to discount the role of mental disturbance in mass shootings. By doing so, it can keep all of the focus on guns and “white supremacy.”
In addition, allowing mental disturbance to enter the conversation might lead to a discussion of family breakdown and loss of religious faith. The left wants to steer clear of that discussion at all costs.
[...]
In July 2019, the U.S. Secret Service released its report “Mass Attacks in Public Spaces—2018.” The report covered 27 attacks that resulted in 91 deaths and 107 injuries. The investigators found that 67% of the suspects displayed symptoms of mental illness or emotional disturbance. In 93% of the incidents, the authorities found that the suspects had a history of threats or other troubling communications.
The results were similar to those of another study published by the Secret Service on 28 such attacks in 2017.
[...]
Mental illness and mass murder
“Why are Progressives afraid to address MENTAL ILLNESS AND MASS MURDER?”
They’re not – this is a lie.
They correctly understand that the issue is far more complex than just addressing mental illness.
‘Progressives’ are also correct to point out the hypocrisy of conservatives with regard to mental illness and mass murder – where rightists oppose measures that would ensure all Americans have access to affordable healthcare, including
mental health care.
Conservatives can’t have it both ways.
Drank the Obama kool-aid I see.
Numbers are very similar from Obama to Trump and the premiums were skyrocketing long before Trump came into office, nice try.
AP FACT CHECK: Obama doesn't always tell the straight story
OBAMA: “Their sabotage of the Affordable Care Act has already cost more than 3 million Americans their health insurance. And if they’re still in power next fall, you better believe they’re coming at it again. They’ve said so.” -- Illinois rally.
THE FACTS: Obama is cherry-picking survey results, overlooking a recent estimate from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that found the number of uninsured Americans basically unchanged under Trump.
He’s also blaming Republicans for all the problems with health insurance, ignoring the fact that premiums started going up sharply under his watch.
Updated last month, CDC’s National Health Interview Survey finds the number of uninsured no worse so far under Trump. It estimated that 28.3 million Americans of all ages were uninsured during the first three months of 2018, or 8.8 percent of the population. That compares with 28.6 million uninsured people — or 9 percent of the population — during 2016, Obama’s last full year in office.
Obama’s office said his reference to 3 million more uninsured comes from a major private survey of U.S. adults, the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index.
Early this year, Gallup-Sharecare estimated the uninsured rate among adults was 12.2 percent in the last three months of 2017, an increase of 1.3 percentage points from the same period in 2016, just before Obama left office. That would translate to an estimated 3.2 million more uninsured adults during Trump’s first year.
It was during that time that the new president and the GOP Congress were frantically trying to repeal “Obamacare,” which would have made 20 million people or more uninsured. But they failed.
The
CDC and
Gallup surveys are well-regarded by experts. One difference is that the CDC’s numbers include all Americans, not just adults. It’s not unheard of to have differences. Another estimate, from the Census Bureau, is expected this week.
Sign-ups for government-sponsored private insurance under Obama’s law show a drop under Trump, but not 3 million. Nearly 12.7 million people signed up during the 2016 open enrollment season, the last one fully under the Obama administration’s control.
For 2018, despite Trump’s continuing hostility toward the program, higher premiums and fewer insurers, the number was close to 11.8 million. That’s about 900,000 fewer.
Enrollment through expanded Medicaid —the other major source of Obamacare coverage — appears to be stable at about 12 million people