Why are liberals obsessed with homosexuality

[martybegan]

But hey, there ARE too many people on the planet, perhaps it is the world's way of saying "**** off and die some, so that other animals can have their place", the world is an amazing place.

Scratch any progressive's surface and you find at the root self-loathing like this, that they translate to the concept of Humanity as a disease on the face of planet Earth.

It seemed an appropriate response to the statement that homosexuality will result in human extinction.

The response can be whatever, I was merely stating my opinion on the underlying roots of the response.

 

[WinterBorn]

But hey, there ARE too many people on the planet, perhaps it is the world's way of saying "**** off and die some, so that other animals can have their place", the world is an amazing place.

Scratch any progressive's surface and you find at the root self-loathing like this, that they translate to the concept of Humanity as a disease on the face of planet Earth.

It seemed an appropriate response to the statement that homosexuality will result in human extinction.

The response can be whatever, I was merely stating my opinion on the underlying roots of the response.

It might be self loathing. Or it might be looking at things from another perspective. It is undeniable that mankind has done a great deal of harm.

 

[martybegan]

But hey, there ARE too many people on the planet, perhaps it is the world's way of saying "**** off and die some, so that other animals can have their place", the world is an amazing place.

Scratch any progressive's surface and you find at the root self-loathing like this, that they translate to the concept of Humanity as a disease on the face of planet Earth.

It seemed an appropriate response to the statement that homosexuality will result in human extinction.

The response can be whatever, I was merely stating my opinion on the underlying roots of the response.

It might be self loathing. Or it might be looking at things from another perspective. It is undeniable that mankind has done a great deal of harm.

As George Carlin once said, we aren't going to hurt the planet, we are only going to hurt ourselves. If we go by nature, Humans are simply using their biological gifts as any other animal would. We are a natural part of the environment and part of the circle of life. Asking us to go without our intellect, and by extension our technology is like asking a lion to not use is teeth or a bird to not use its wings.

 

[WinterBorn]

But hey, there ARE too many people on the planet, perhaps it is the world's way of saying "**** off and die some, so that other animals can have their place", the world is an amazing place.

Scratch any progressive's surface and you find at the root self-loathing like this, that they translate to the concept of Humanity as a disease on the face of planet Earth.

It seemed an appropriate response to the statement that homosexuality will result in human extinction.

The response can be whatever, I was merely stating my opinion on the underlying roots of the response.

It might be self loathing. Or it might be looking at things from another perspective. It is undeniable that mankind has done a great deal of harm.

As George Carlin once said, we aren't going to hurt the planet, we are only going to hurt ourselves. If we go by nature, Humans are simply using their biological gifts as any other animal would. We are a natural part of the environment and part of the circle of life. Asking us to go without our intellect, and by extension our technology is like asking a lion to not use is teeth or a bird to not use its wings.

Except the lion's teeth and bird's wings do not render large swathes of land uninhabitable for hundreds or even thousands of years. The waste produced in nature is not toxic fir generations.

I am not saying I want mankind gone. Just presenting an alternative to "self loathing" as the sole motivation.

 

[bodecea]

Homosexuality has always existed, but lately it has become an obsession.

You see it in every movie, every TV show, and literally, it seems that Hollywood is determined to show us gay sex scenes whether or not we want to see them.

I see it as part of the decline of Western civilization.

It's like putting too many rats in a cage, or too many humans in a city. When animals or humans become too crowded, they become homosexual, and then they die out.

It's Mother Nature's way of saying, "I'm done with you. Go extinct."

Who started this thread...........................?

 

[miketx]

Why liberals are? Look ate the stupid crap they post everyday. They are insane.

 

[bodecea]

Among Karl Marx's original plan for Communism was the elimination of marriage and family, which he saw as artifacts of the bourgeois culture that he wanted to eradicate. This was very quickly abandoned by most movements to openly implement Communism, but it broke off and took on a life of its own, eventually finding a home among modern “liberals”, including American Democrats. Though I don't think they now have any idea of why they are doing this, the modern left's embrace of premarital and extramarital sex, bastardy, homosexuality, transgenderism, and other forms of destructive, immoral sexual perversion, are all part of this Marxist attack on marriage and family.

Ah....I suppose that explains why we fought to hard for legal marriage...........

 

[bodecea]

It can be summed up by the words moral relativism. Where there is no moral standard, morality is defined by the individual. The elimination of the importance of gender means your mind is ready to be groomed for anything. Once that bridge is crossed they own you.

Ah....that would explain why the Religious Right would vote willingly for a ***** grabbing, cheating on his marriage vows guy.

 

[bodecea]

Look at recent illegitimacy rates. About 40% for the population as a whole, in this country. That's forty percent of children not being born into an intact family, with a mother and a father. In some ethnic groups, this rate is as high as 75% to 80%. There is your destruction of the family, and there is your destruction of society. That is what Marx wanted, but which even his overt followers knew better than to seek. That is what the pervert-rights movement, a breakaway from Marxism, is seeking to achieve, and which, to some degree, is successfully achieving.

To be sure, there are other forces also exerting undue stress against the family, but this is the core of the problem.

Ah....that's to be blamed on gays, is it?

 

[martybegan]

Scratch any progressive's surface and you find at the root self-loathing like this, that they translate to the concept of Humanity as a disease on the face of planet Earth.

It seemed an appropriate response to the statement that homosexuality will result in human extinction.

The response can be whatever, I was merely stating my opinion on the underlying roots of the response.

It might be self loathing. Or it might be looking at things from another perspective. It is undeniable that mankind has done a great deal of harm.

As George Carlin once said, we aren't going to hurt the planet, we are only going to hurt ourselves. If we go by nature, Humans are simply using their biological gifts as any other animal would. We are a natural part of the environment and part of the circle of life. Asking us to go without our intellect, and by extension our technology is like asking a lion to not use is teeth or a bird to not use its wings.

Except the lion's teeth and bird's wings do not render large swathes of land uninhabitable for hundreds or even thousands of years. The waste produced in nature is not toxic fir generations.

I am not saying I want mankind gone. Just presenting an alternative to "self loathing" as the sole motivation.

Nah, it's self loathing. If you do something that doesn't involve the whole "better off without man around" thing then I would concede your point, but a lot of these posters just reek of hatred of themselves translated to "man bad"

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

its dicks that they are obsessed with....I swear to god, you cant talk about handguns in their presence without them making a dick joke. In fact when I was OC'ing my .44 some broad in a bernie t-shirt asked me straight up if I carried it cuz I was compensating. I answered "yes ma'am I am, If I could kill socialists from yards away with my dick, I wouldnt need a gun"

 

[Disir]

Look at recent illegitimacy rates. About 40% for the population as a whole, in this country. That's forty percent of children not being born into an intact family, with a mother and a father. In some ethnic groups, this rate is as high as 75% to 80%. There is your destruction of the family, and there is your destruction of society. That is what Marx wanted, but which even his overt followers knew better than to seek. That is what the pervert-rights movement, a breakaway from Marxism, is seeking to achieve, and which, to some degree, is successfully achieving.

To be sure, there are other forces also exerting undue stress against the family, but this is the core of the problem.

Marx/Engels Works by Date

There you go. Now prove it. It should not be very hard to back up what you are claiming.

 

[miketx]

its dicks that they are obsessed with....I swear to god, you cant talk about handguns in their presence without them making a dick joke. In fact when I was OC'ing my .44 some broad in a bernie t-shirt asked me straight up if I carried it cuz I was compensating. I answered "yes ma'am I am, If I could kill socialists from yards away with my dick, I wouldnt need a gun"

Next time do what I did:

Skank: "You only have a gun like that to compensate!"

ME: "If that were true, I never would have bought a revolver with a 2 inch barrel."

 

[Disir]

Here is the deal. Hollywood adds characters to target specific groups. It does the same thing with heterosexuals in bizarre ways. Example: Pearl Harbor. The deal was to add "romance" to tie in another audience. This in turn made the movie suck. Nonetheless it was all about the money. That would be capitalism by the way.

I, personally, don't give a damn what people watch. I'm going to need a plot and some dialogue. I pay more attention to who is writing. The creation of any character simply to exist is really not good enough.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Ah....I suppose that explains why we fought to hard for legal marriage...........

By definition, marriage always has been, and always will be, between a man and a woman. What you fought for was to mock marriage, and to undermine it, and with it, to undermine society as a whole.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There you go. Now prove it. It should not be very hard to back up what you are claiming.

If you are so willfully, stubbornly blind that you will not see the obvious connection between the moral degradation being imposed on our culture by the pervert-rights movement; and the increase in illegitimacy together with all the social ills that this brings, then I cannot imagine what proof would convince you.

 

[Disir]

There you go. Now prove it. It should not be very hard to back up what you are claiming.

If you are so willfully, stubbornly blind that you will not see the obvious connection between the moral degradation being imposed on our culture by the pervert-rights movement; and the increase in illegitimacy together with all the social ills that this brings, then I cannot imagine what proof would convince you.

I just want to make sure I heard you correctly. You dunno.