Whoa, What Was That Again?

[Independent thinker]

"A new bill in California would allow private citizens go after gun makers in the same way Texas lets them target abortion providers."

Is the left now admitting that Texas' law was acceptable after all? And constitutional?

California bill would have citizens enforce weapons ban

California Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed Friday letting private citizens in his state sue gun makers to stop them from selling assault weapons just as Texas lets its residents sue abortion providers to stop the procedures, then essentially dared the U.S. Supreme Court to treat both issues the same...

www.yahoo.com

 

[pknopp]

No, they are practicing an "eye for an eye". I don't support that as the Supreme Court will end up overturning the Texas law.

 

[rightwinger]

"A new bill in California would allow private citizens go after gun makers in the same way Texas lets them target abortion providers."

Is the left now admitting that Texas' law was acceptable after all? And constitutional?

California bill would have citizens enforce weapons ban

California Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed Friday letting private citizens in his state sue gun makers to stop them from selling assault weapons just as Texas lets its residents sue abortion providers to stop the procedures, then essentially dared the U.S. Supreme Court to treat both issues the same...

www.yahoo.com

The left is putting pressure on SCOTUS

If you are allowing Texans to enforce the law on abortion, California must be allowed the same on guns

 

[OKTexas]

Only problem is federal law grants gun manufacturers immunity from those frivolous law suits.

.

 

[rightwinger]

Only problem is federal law grants gun manufacturers immunity from those frivolous law suits.

.

Didn’t help Remington in the suit by Sandy Hook parents

 

[pknopp]

Only problem is federal law grants gun manufacturers immunity from those frivolous law suits.

.

Federal law permits the abortion providers to provide abortions also. But this is why the courts will overturn the Texas law.

 

[OKTexas]

The left is putting pressure on SCOTUS

If you are allowing Texans to enforce the law on abortion, California must be allowed the same on guns

No the left is trying to circumvent federal law, it ain't gonna work.

.

 

[whitehall]

Yeah but gun deaths in California are related to the unlawful use of a legally manufactured product. More Californians are killed in car accidents.

 

[sealybobo]

"A new bill in California would allow private citizens go after gun makers in the same way Texas lets them target abortion providers."

Is the left now admitting that Texas' law was acceptable after all? And constitutional?

California bill would have citizens enforce weapons ban

California Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed Friday letting private citizens in his state sue gun makers to stop them from selling assault weapons just as Texas lets its residents sue abortion providers to stop the procedures, then essentially dared the U.S. Supreme Court to treat both issues the same...

www.yahoo.com

If they got away with it in Texas, why not try it in California? If the Supreme Court contradicts itself in it's rulings, what will that say? It'll say they are legislating from the bench. Playing politics from the bench. They aren't supposed to be doing that.

 

[OKTexas]

Didn’t help Remington in the suit by Sandy Hook parents

So what have the got out of it, other than wasting a lot of money?

.

 

[task0778]

No the left is trying to circumvent federal law, it ain't gonna work.

.

There's a federal law that says you can't sue a gun manufacturer for a criminal act using one of their guns? Didn't know that, was there maybe a Supreme Court decision that said that? If there isn't, there oughta be but I didn't know that was the case.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

California should just secede and wallow in it's unfunded debt

 

[rightwinger]

So what have the got out of it, other than wasting a lot of money?

.

Don’t you agree the law should be applied equally to all states?

 

[OKTexas]

Federal law permits the abortion providers to provide abortions also. But this is why the courts will overturn the Texas law.

for the law.

.

 

[sealybobo]

So what have the got out of it, other than wasting a lot of money?

.

It set a precedence.

 

[pknopp]

for the law.

.

Serious?

Roe v. Wade | Summary, Origins, & Influence

 

[OKTexas]

If they got away with it in Texas, why not try it in California? If the Supreme Court contradicts itself in it's rulings, what will that say? It'll say they are legislating from the bench. Playing politics from the bench. They aren't supposed to be doing that.

Wrong again commie, it will say they are two distinct and separate topics.

.

 

[OKTexas]

There's a federal law that says you can't sue a gun manufacturer for a criminal act using one of their guns? Didn't know that, was there maybe a Supreme Court decision that said that? If there isn't, there oughta be but I didn't know that was the case.

Yes, there is a law saying exactly that.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Don’t you agree the law should be applied equally to all states?

It is, separate topics, being treated separately, go freaking figure. And why didn't you answer the question?

.

 

[OKTexas]

It set a precedence.

Yeah, that it's a loser and a waste of time and money.

.