The Western democracies have a real problem with the concept of āfreedom of speechā. Their hypocrisy and double standards know no borders. The inflicted state terrorism of the West against Muslims in the Middle East or non-white peoples in Africa or elsewhere is boundless. But when these downtrodden victims of Western genocidal attacks fight back, they are called āterroristsā. Insults and incitement against Muslims and their prophet Mohammad falls allegedly under the concept of freedom of speech, which is assumed unlimited, however, when this noble concept is used against the atrocities committed by the Zionist occupying regime in Palestine or its US master, itās considered a ācrimeā by the French judiciary.
Maurice Sinet, who worked as a political cartoonist for āCharlie Hebdoā for 20 years, was fired in 2009 for his āanti-Semiticā cartoon mocking the relationship of Nikolas Sarkozyās son, Jean, with a wealthy Jewish woman. Commenting on rumors that Jean considered to convert to Judaism out of carrier reasons, Maurice Sinet quipped: āāHeāll go a long way in life, that little lad.ā He was charged of āinciting racial hatredā. After the journalist Claude Askolovitch thought, Sinetās article was anti-Semitic, then editor in chief, Philippe Val, demanded an apology from Sinet. He refused saying: āIād rather cut my balls off.ā He lost his job. One of the many Zionist front Organization took him to court, and Sinet won a 40, 000 Euro court judgment against his former publisher. (1)
The controversial French comedian DieudonnĆ© Mābala Mābala posted on facebook āI like Charlie Coulibalyā. An investigation by the Paris prosecutorās office followed immediately, and two days later, Wednesday 14 January, he was arrested for exercising his right of freedom of speech. His shows are banned because of being āanti-Semiticā. With the approval of the French government freedom of expression can be utilized, but if it doesnāt fit into the prevailing political concept of the ruling political and media class, one has a problem.
The āprotest march of millionsā in Paris , āledā by 40 big shots, was a fake. The heads of states did not lead the march, instead they flew in for a photo op on a hermetically sealed street. No wonder that US President Obama did not want to waste his time for such a gimmick. Many of these heads of states fight against freedom of speech in their own countries. Was this the only manipulation by the corporate media?
The circumstances of the terror attack at āCharlie Hebdoā raises more questions that it has answered so far. The cold-blooded assassination of police officer Ahmed Merabet at point-blank range did not cause a single blood splatter on the sidewalk. In the assassination of John F. Kennedy, however, there was blood and brain all over the car. How come that the attack by the Kouachi brothers and their getaway were filmed from roof tops? Who were these people and who stationed them there? Do people take their IDs with them, when going on a deadly rampage? But the world knows already that itās possible to find a brand-new passport besides the pulverized twin towers in New York City . Like the 9/11 hijackers, the perpetrators of the Paris atrocities were known within minutes.
I 8217 m Maurice Sinet 8211 8220 I Like Charlie Coulibaly 8221 8211 Wake Up From Your Slumber
