"Who won the veep debate" thread

[AceRothstein]

Ever notice how it is fine for a progressive to be a catholic but if a conservative is one he is a fanatic???? You progressive are so hypocritical it is sickening.

Most Democrats don't let their religious convictions dictate their stance on issues, unlike Republicans.

 

[Barb]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

heh

 

[toomuchtime_]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

No one should have been surprised by the first debate. Looking back to 2008, on his best days Obama was never more than a mediocre debater, and if you followed the Republican primary debates, you saw that Romney is an excellent debater, aggressive but respectful, focused, disciplined. Romney won the first debate because when voters saw the real Mitt Romney, not the pack of lies the Obama campaign has been selling, standing shoulder to shoulder with the real Barack Obama, not the myth David Axelrod invented, they found that Romney looked and sounded like a leader, a president, and Obama did not. They will see the same thing in the second debate. The voters weren't fooled by Romney, they discovered that they had been fooled by David Axelrod into thinking Obama was more than he really is.

 

[JoeB131]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

What did Romney "get away with"?...Having more facts to bring to the table? Oh no..wait..Romney's people went in to Obama's debate people, paid them off to sabotage Obama's performance?
The people will not be permitted to ask of the candidates directly. Their questions will be written down pre debate and screened.
Obama was unprepared. Romney forced Obama, to debate as though Obama is the current president. Instead of Obama's style of running as though he were the challenger.
Obama is going to be forced to discuss his record. And once again, he will be at a disadvantage. Romney, if he's smart, will hit Obama with the Terror attack on the US Embassy in Libya. He should also nail Obama on his support for Arab Spring AND the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yes, using Ambassador Steven's coffin as a soap box has worked so well for the weird Mormon Robot.

Romney told total bullshit, lied his ass off even by Mormon standards, and Lehrner let him get away with it. He won't get away with it next time, to be sure.

Nor will Obama be as passive.

 

[JoeB131]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

No one should have been surprised by the first debate. Looking back to 2008, on his best days Obama was never more than a mediocre debater, and ....

And I decided to snip the rest of the racist, ODS crap that followed, because it was disconnected from reality.

Obama did very well in debates against both Hillary Clinton and John McCain, both seasoned debaters.

Romney was different in that he got up there, lied his ass off, no one called him on it at the time. He won't get away with it a second time.

 

[JoeB131]

Ever notice how it is fine for a progressive to be a catholic but if a conservative is one he is a fanatic???? You progressive are so hypocritical it is sickening.

I think that if you are trying to impose your religion on other people, no matter what your religion is, that's unacceptable.

 

[thanatos144]

Ever notice how it is fine for a progressive to be a catholic but if a conservative is one he is a fanatic???? You progressive are so hypocritical it is sickening.

I think that if you are trying to impose your religion on other people, no matter what your religion is, that's unacceptable.

I am not a catholic you bigot .

 

[Bfgrn]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

What did Romney "get away with"?...Having more facts to bring to the table? Oh no..wait..Romney's people went in to Obama's debate people, paid them off to sabotage Obama's performance?
The people will not be permitted to ask of the candidates directly. Their questions will be written down pre debate and screened.
Obama was unprepared. Romney forced Obama, to debate as though Obama is the current president. Instead of Obama's style of running as though he were the challenger.
Obama is going to be forced to discuss his record. And once again, he will be at a disadvantage. Romney, if he's smart, will hit Obama with the Terror attack on the US Embassy in Libya. He should also nail Obama on his support for Arab Spring AND the Muslim Brotherhood.

YEA...THAT will work! PLEASE send Mitten an e-mail demanding he do that...

 

[LilOlLady]

Does honesty, integrity on the facts of issues even matters anymore? I have heard nothing on who won on facts and issues. Only who presented the best face. Smiles or frowns?

 

[mudwhistle]

well he can,t afford to get personal. I just saw rupert murdoch a romney supporter tweet that romney need to avoid personal abuse. so he assuming obama will get personal which he need to avoid. be assertive but don,t be personal.

Again, Romney isn't going to get away with the shit he pulled in the first debate a second time.

Not to mention it's a Town Hall style debate, so he's going to get questions from "the little people" who normally do his lawn and stuff.

What did Romney "get away with"?...Having more facts to bring to the table? Oh no..wait..Romney's people went in to Obama's debate people, paid them off to sabotage Obama's performance?
The people will not be permitted to ask of the candidates directly. Their questions will be written down pre debate and screened.
Obama was unprepared. Romney forced Obama, to debate as though Obama is the current president. Instead of Obama's style of running as though he were the challenger.
Obama is going to be forced to discuss his record. And once again, he will be at a disadvantage. Romney, if he's smart, will hit Obama with the Terror attack on the US Embassy in Libya. He should also nail Obama on his support for Arab Spring AND the Muslim Brotherhood.

He's not gonna get away with being a better candidate dammit.

 

[LilOlLady]

Obama has 1,000,000 plus lies to nail Romney on.



Daily Kos: YES!! Once Again--ALL OF ROMNEY'S LIES IN ONE PLACE: UPDATED!

 

[JakeStarkey]

When are you ever going to make sense, bigot?

Ever notice how it is fine for a progressive to be a catholic but if a conservative is one he is a fanatic???? You progressive are so hypocritical it is sickening.

I think that if you are trying to impose your religion on other people, no matter what your religion is, that's unacceptable.

I am not a catholic you bigot .

 

[Barb]

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama has 1,000,000 plus lies to nail Romney on.



Daily Kos: YES!! Once Again--ALL OF ROMNEY'S LIES IN ONE PLACE: UPDATED!

Romney has one Obama lie he can use all day.....that al Qaeda is dying and the Libyan attack proves it.

.....Al Zawahiri, Osama's second in command, issued a video the day before in Pakistan, calling for revenge against the Americans. A Libyan AQ has just been killed by a Predator strike supposedly directed by President Obama. The week before, a bomb had exploded outside of the compound. All events unusual events, to say the least. All that should have required a heightened state of alertness.) http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/al_qaida_strikes_america_america_denies_reality.html

 

[thereisnospoon]

Obama has 1,000,000 plus lies to nail Romney on.



Daily Kos: YES!! Once Again--ALL OF ROMNEY'S LIES IN ONE PLACE: UPDATED!

Yes but Obama is "evolving"..

The daily kos?....I think kos isn't quite biased enough.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Libyan incident has been poorly handled from the beginning, mostly by the administration but with less fault, by Romney, too, who shot off his mouth when he had no idea of what he was talking about.

But to suggest that somehow Libya is going to erase the admin's foreign policy accomplishments, not the least being killing Osama, with the American electorate is stupid.

 

[Jroc]

The Libyan incident has been poorly handled from the beginning, mostly by the administration but with less fault, by Romney, too, who shot off his mouth when he had no idea of what he was talking about.

But to suggest that somehow Libya is going to erase the admin's foreign policy accomplishments, not the least being killing Osama, with the American electorate is stupid.

Romney appreciates your "support" Now please don't "help" him He can do without idiots like you

 

[JakeStarkey]

Romney can only win this if he argues what he can do economically in the future. He cannot win points on international topics. is hurting Romney by suggesting that Libya is going to be of any help tomorrow night. If MR pushes it, BHO is going to use it to talk about the WH accomplishments overseas.

I have said from the beginning that the American people rightfully hate the GOP for their irresponsible adventurism from 1994 to 2006 and the Busn neo-con imperialism and spending that has nearly crashed America.

Obama has not been a good president, but has been far better than Bush. Jroc's nonsense only underlines the truth of what I have said. Turn our backs on Bush, look forward on the economic front, ignore everything else, particularly from the far right.

 

[Jroc]

Romney can only win this if he argues what he can do economically in the future. He cannot win points on international topics. is hurting Romney by suggesting that Libya is going to be of any help tomorrow night. If MR pushes it, BHO is going to use it to talk about the WH accomplishments overseas.

I have said from the beginning that the American people rightfully hate the GOP for their irresponsible adventurism from 1994 to 2006 and the Busn neo-con imperialism and spending that has nearly crashed America.

Obama has not been a good president, but has been far better than Bush. Jroc's nonsense only underlines the truth of what I have said. Turn our backs on Bush, look forward on the economic front, ignore everything else, particularly from the far right.

Please....the Libyan debacle is party responsible for Obama's drop in the polls, you're an idiot...And "forward" is Obama's slogan get it straight fraud

 

[JakeStarkey]

Please you idiot. Libya is a minor issue that distracts from the far larger one, the economy. If MR brings up Libya, Obama will use it as an opening to talk about his foreign policy accomplishments and drag Bush's mistaken and failed policies into the debate.

Most Americans hate the Bush presidency, Jroc. If they did not, MR would be ahead by 15 points.

Do not let BHO bring up foreign policy and Bush. That would be disastrous.