The daily mail article is very thorough. They said they obtained documents.
The US National Institutes of Health, a government agency, awarded a $3.7million research grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study coronavirus transmission.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Daily mail:
View attachment 322918
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Garbage site.
So you don’t believe this article?
Joe Biden lashed out at President Trump for 'making excuses' in an op-ed in the New York Times detailing how he would handle the coroanvirus pandemic as president.
www.dailymail.co.uk
It is not to say I believe or not... I just don't consider them a source of news as they are unreliable...
Former Vice President Joe Biden on Monday accused President Trump of dithering in the early days of the coronavirus, saying that a “failure of planning and preparation” by the White House has worse…
thehill.com
Former Vice President Joe Biden vowed that, if elected, his administration would "lead by science." Sen. Bernie Sanders urged President Trump to declare a national emergency.
www.npr.org
What sources do you consider credible?
I will entertain a source that uses credible references or has a history of using information that has turned out to be truth...
This is the Daily Mail... They are gutter press and I actually know one of there journalists...
This is in there article:
According to one
unverified claim, scientists at the institute could have become infected after being sprayed with blood containing the virus, and then passed it on to the local community.
unverified : We made this up, cause we are sure as hell not backing this up.
While scientists believe that the virus jumped to humans from wild animals sold as food in a market in Wuhan, conspiracy theorists promote different assumptions.
Some of them claim that the virus, formally known as SARS-CoV-2, could be a biological warfare weapon engineered there.
Others suspect that it escaped from the lab.
Some and Others: That would be the Daily Mail cleaner who got a chemistry set when she was 12 years old.
Finally buried at the bottom:
Shi told the respected science journal Scientific American last month of her relief when, having checked back through disposal records, none of the genome sequences matched their virus samples.
'That really took a load off my mind. I had not slept a wink for days,' she said.
Did they world leading virus experts say COVID19 is highly unlikely to produced in a lab and debunked 6 weeks ago...
That is why this article & thread is a laugh. It starts believing the Conspiracy Theory has any merit. No it doesn't and by referring to it you are just showing us you a ignorant fool to be played with..
More from the article buried way down:
Dr Keusch, Professor of Medicine and International Health at Boston University's Schools of Medicine and Public Health, stressed that no release of viruses from a high-level lab, such as the one in Wuhan, 'has ever happened'.
He defended his peers in the Chinese city as he said: 'The Wuhan lab is designed to the highest standards with redundant safety systems and the highest level of training.
'Many of its research faculty trained at a similar laboratory in Galveston, Texas. So we know the Wuhan team is as qualified as the Texas group…