- Thread starter
- #21
You've cites to Snopes outing what you cite for authority as being unverifiable! (shaking head)
You moron.....I state the problem is attribution.
"...outing what you cite for authority..."
I did no such thing, imbecile.
I cited Snopes for exactly that purpose.
Although possibly mis-attributed, the veracity of the quote is undeniable.
The problem for you, in addition to you innate mental impermeability, is that, whoever said it.....it's true.
And you just hate the truth.
you dipshit, you posted "the quote is undeniable" yet you admit there's no attribution. You're a fcukikng moron
I can always tell when you know you've lost by the profanity.
And, of course, you are a loser.
Let's review:
1. From the OP, the very first line, in fact: "...could not trace down the actual source."
2. Preceding the quote, I wrote 'supposedly' from Czech Prague Newspaper....
For your edification, dope,..
sup·pos·ed·ly
səˈpōzidlē/Submit
adverb
according to what is generally assumed or believed (often used to indicate that the speaker doubts the truth of the statement).
So...any, except for a proven imbecile like you, would immediately understand that I'm not claiming the quote is from a Czech paper.....
Still with me, imbecile?
3. I then provided the link to Snopes so you could ascertain why I said "supposedly."
4. This was followed by "Although possibly mis-attributed, the veracity of the quote is undeniable."
How could any but a moron misunderstand....oh,...right...you are a moron.
A moron who has been reduce to vulgar language by being revealed to be so.
5. And....you made certain that all would understand you to be a dope, you wrote:
"...outing what you cite for authority as being unverifiable! (shaking head)"
...when no such thing occurred.
I must admit that pillorying you has been a pleasure!
In fact, one of the highlights of my day!
