Who shall investigate the investigators (a J6 committee update)!

[alang1216]

Nor did I ever say, suggest or even imply that it did, you fuckin’ moron.

Did I ever say, suggest or even imply that you did, you fuckin’ moron?

I didn’t engage in whataboutism, either, you jerkoff.

Did I ever say that you did? I only offered a place if you wanted to, you jerkoff.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

THE LEADER MUST NEVER BE QUESTIONED!

I have no idea of what you're talking about ....carry on.

 

[OldFlame]

When did the GOP stop being the party of law and order? How old do you have to be before you can break laws and not pay the consequences?

Why don't you ask your party leaders and all of the illegal aliens they let in?

 

[alang1216]

Why don't you ask your party leaders and all of the illegal aliens they let in?

Classic Rightwing whataboutism. They broke the law so we can too. They stole the election so whatever damage we do to democracy is OK. They are evil so we can lie. They commit crimes so we'll pardon our people.

 

[Edgetho]

When did the GOP stop being the party of law and order? How old do you have to be before you can break laws and not pay the consequences?

Sieg Heil, bitch

 

[struth]

When did the GOP stop being the party of law and order? How old do you have to be before you can break laws and not pay the consequences?

How did she not have any consequences?

 

[Zincwarrior]

I have no idea of what you're talking about ....carry on.

Of course you do.

 

[alang1216]

How did she not have any consequences?

The judicial system established the consequences but they were ignored.

 

[struth]

The judicial system established the consequences but they were ignored.

Not all of them, she was convicted and served some time.

 

[BackAgain]

Who determines what is 'evidence' and what is not?

Another stupid ass question.

 

[BackAgain]

Did I ever say, suggest or even imply that you did, you fuckin’ moron?


Did I ever say that you did? I only offered a place if you wanted to, you jerkoff.

So now we add “obvious liar” to your list of many negatives.

You scumbag bitch

Back ON Topic, now:

Is it ok, in your shallow and hypocritical universe, for a member of that partisan committee to conceal evidence?

 

[Edgetho]

So now we add “obvious liar” to your list of many negatives.

You scumbag bitch

Back ON Topic, now:

Is it ok, in your shallow and hypocritical universe, for a member of that partisan committee to conceal evidence?

Funny how they go quiet after you confront them with their own scumbaggery.

dimocraps are irredeemable scum. Every last one of them. There's just no point......

 

[alang1216]

Not all of them, she was convicted and served some time.

The law said to serve x, Trump said she only had to serve y. He has that right but it is not what the law said so he put himself above the law and the judge and the jury.

 

[alang1216]

Another stupid ass question.

A stupid ass question you couldn't answer.

 

[BackAgain]

A stupid ass question you couldn't answer.

Nah. Just a stupid asshole question.

 

[alang1216]

Is it ok, in your shallow and hypocritical universe, for a member of that partisan committee to conceal evidence?

No, it is not.

 

[BackAgain]

No, it is not.

Progress!

But Lez Cheney apparently did.

Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence: report

A new report argued the Jan. 6 committee suppressed an interview that detailed how the Trump administration called for National Guard presence in 2021.

www.foxnews.com

Chairman Loudermilk Releases Second January 6, 2021 Report

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

 

[struth]

The law said to serve x, Trump said she only had to serve y. He has that right but it is not what the law said so he put himself above the law and the judge and the jury.

Because the law allowed Trump to do that. Actually the US Constitution, gave him that power, so no he didn’t put himself above the law

The prior admin abused its power by seeking an unfair sentence for a elderly peaceful protester because they didn’t agree with her protest

 

[alang1216]

Progress!

But Lez Cheney apparently did.

Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence: report

A new report argued the Jan. 6 committee suppressed an interview that detailed how the Trump administration called for National Guard presence in 2021.

www.foxnews.com

Chairman Loudermilk Releases Second January 6, 2021 Report

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

Neither of those sources are even close to being honest and unbiased so I'll reserve judgment until I hear from Cheney and the committee.

 

[alang1216]

Because the law allowed Trump to do that. Actually the US Constitution, gave him that power, so no he didn’t put himself above the law

Yes, he legally circumvented the sentencing guidelines for the crime.

The prior admin abused its power by seeking an unfair sentence for a elderly peaceful protester because they didn’t agree with her protest

You are entitled to your opinion and that is what you wrote, your opinion.