Who Is Occupying Who's Land?

[Phoenall]

You are so funny. The internet is filled with anti Zionist & anti Israel garbage & this is what you have to say about it. Heh Heh!

How strange that contrary to what you say, the Israelis have budgets to train people to troll Wiki. LOL You nutcases just can't accept fact.

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

The Guardian is known as the grauniad in the UK were it is published, it has no base outside of the UK. So why LIE to bull up your source.

 

[montelatici]

How strange that contrary to what you say, the Israelis have budgets to train people to troll Wiki. LOL You nutcases just can't accept fact.

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

 

[montelatici]

How strange that contrary to what you say, the Israelis have budgets to train people to troll Wiki. LOL You nutcases just can't accept fact.

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

The Guardian is known as the grauniad in the UK were it is published, it has no base outside of the UK. So why LIE to bull up your source.

Could you please elaborate as what I lied about?

 

[montelatici]

But, would you say that this newspaper is also biased?

" 'Zionist editing' on Wikipedia"

Advertisement

or this one?

"Wikipedia Editing for Zionists"

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/20...ting-for-zionists/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

 

[Phoenall]

The better lesson from history would be that demographics eventually win the war. Algeria, South Africa, Rhodesia etc.

Apples and oranges, dood.

Not at all. But go delusional if you like.

It wasn't demographics that led to the downfall of the rulers but terrorism, and now all 3 nations are seen as no go areas with the highest violent ceime rates of anywhere in the world. They even make Syria look like a playschool in comparison.

Is that what you plan for Palestine, endless violence and mass murders of the arab muslims as each side fights for power.

LMAO! Just how nutty are you? Go tell what you just posted to a Zoroastrian.

Just posting a scholarly work from Yale. You can go ahead and spout nonsense.

So why didn't the authors put their names to it, or was it an example of what not to write.

No author so no validity

Hugh Kennedy, a professor at Yale, if you had taken the time to go on the Yale.edu site.

I should not have to, it should be provided by the source material. But on checking I find he is actually with the SOAS University of London an ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA edifice. So want to try again with the truth this tome. He is not a fellow of Yale is he, he just paid to have his ANTI SEMITIC work published by Yale.

So the University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies is an Islamonazi propaganda "edifice"? Can you provide some back up to your assertion?

Yep as all it deals with is ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA it is in its name and its boasts.

 

[Phoenall]

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

The Guardian is known as the grauniad in the UK were it is published, it has no base outside of the UK. So why LIE to bull up your source.

Could you please elaborate as what I lied about?

That in Europe it is seen as a middle of the road newspaper, when in fact it is only read by anti semitic Jew haters

 

[Phoenall]

But, would you say that this newspaper is also biased?

" 'Zionist editing' on Wikipedia"

Advertisement

or this one?

"Wikipedia Editing for Zionists"

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/20...ting-for-zionists/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Yes Haaretz allows anyone to post on their news site, and has the usual get out clause that it is not responsible for the authors words.

A blog is hardly a newspaper is it, all it is in reality is the views of the individual

 

[toastman]

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

LOL you're just copying what I said. If you would only post fact, I wouldn't have anything to dismantle.
The fact of the matter is, I have used links with indisputable evidence to dismantle many of your lies. You are brainwashed and an expert in propaganda.
No matter how many times you run around here saying you speak facts, the REAL fact remains that you're a liar, as many posters have already pointed out, and you simply cannot handle the fact that I have exposed your lies to everyone here.
I thought Tinmore was bad at distorting history, but you take it to a new level !
Monti, you are a lying propagandist and denying it won't change the fact !

 

[toastman]

But they are not Palestinian muslims are they....................

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

"I am a bit smarter than you fools"



That was almost as funny as your "I'm known for posting facts" post

 

[montelatici]

No, Hasbara and CAMERA employs Jews for the most part.

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

LOL you're just copying what I said. If you would only post fact, I wouldn't have anything to dismantle.
The fact of the matter is, I have used links with indisputable evidence to dismantle many of your lies. You are brainwashed and an expert in propaganda.
No matter how many times you run around here saying you speak facts, the REAL fact remains that you're a liar, as many posters have already pointed out, and you simply cannot handle the fact that I have exposed your lies to everyone here.
I thought Tinmore was bad at distorting history, but you take it to a new level !
Monti, you are a lying propagandist and denying it won't change the fact !

Wiki is not indisputable, it can change daily. I only post fact almost always from source documents. I have never lied and no lies were ever exposed. Don't delude yourself. You are just upset that I make you look like a fool.

 

[toastman]

Didn't you use theguardian the other day as a source ? Do you have any idea how biased that site is? Instead of criticizing the source, criticize the article

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

LOL you're just copying what I said. If you would only post fact, I wouldn't have anything to dismantle.
The fact of the matter is, I have used links with indisputable evidence to dismantle many of your lies. You are brainwashed and an expert in propaganda.
No matter how many times you run around here saying you speak facts, the REAL fact remains that you're a liar, as many posters have already pointed out, and you simply cannot handle the fact that I have exposed your lies to everyone here.
I thought Tinmore was bad at distorting history, but you take it to a new level !
Monti, you are a lying propagandist and denying it won't change the fact !

Wiki is not indisputable, it can change daily. I only post fact almost always from source documents. I have never lied and no lies were ever exposed. Don't delude yourself. You are just upset that I make you look like a fool.

Than refute the article not the source.

Please show me ONE instance where you have made a fool of me. Just one .

 

[montelatici]

The Guardian is not biased at all, in Europe it is a middle of the road newspaper. Perhaps a right-wing Nazi might think it's biased. The Morning Star might be left wing and the Torygraph (Telegraph) right-wing but not as right wing as Fox News.

Of course YOU don't think it's biased. You're a brainwashed expert propagandist

But in reality, it's an extremely biased anti Israel site.

No, you and your Hasbara buddies are the brainwashed nutcases. I just have facts on my side, and that upsets you. It helps that I am quite a bit smarter than you fools. By the way, is there any news organization that is not biased against Israel, in your opinion? I doubt it. To you and your ilk any truthful reporting, which invariably shows Israel in a bad light, is bias.

LOL you're just copying what I said. If you would only post fact, I wouldn't have anything to dismantle.
The fact of the matter is, I have used links with indisputable evidence to dismantle many of your lies. You are brainwashed and an expert in propaganda.
No matter how many times you run around here saying you speak facts, the REAL fact remains that you're a liar, as many posters have already pointed out, and you simply cannot handle the fact that I have exposed your lies to everyone here.
I thought Tinmore was bad at distorting history, but you take it to a new level !
Monti, you are a lying propagandist and denying it won't change the fact !

Wiki is not indisputable, it can change daily. I only post fact almost always from source documents. I have never lied and no lies were ever exposed. Don't delude yourself. You are just upset that I make you look like a fool.

Than refute the article not the source.

Please show me ONE instance where you have made a fool of me. Just one .

Glutton for punishment? You sure you want me to post the population figures from the 1921 Report of the Mandatory which completely contradicts your assertion that there were few non-Jews in Palestine and that they "immigrated" to Palestine?

 

[docmauser1]

You sure you want me to post the population figures from the 1921 Report of the Mandatory which completely contradicts your assertion that there were few non-Jews in Palestine and that they "immigrated" to Palestine?

And Transjordan (75% of the mandate palestine) hadn't yet have been handed over to emir Abdullah. We know. We're also eagerly waiting for an explanation how those major arab settlers from the hood all got to be saudi sheiks to own(!) 90%(!) of the government-owned mandate palestine?

 

[montelatici]

You sure you want me to post the population figures from the 1921 Report of the Mandatory which completely contradicts your assertion that there were few non-Jews in Palestine and that they "immigrated" to Palestine?

And Transjordan (75% of the mandate palestine) hadn't yet have been handed over to emir Abdullah. We know. We're also eagerly waiting for an explanation how those major arab settlers from the hood all got to be saudi sheiks to own(!) 90%(!) of the government-owned mandate palestine?

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.

Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania. It is bounded on the north by the frontier of Syria, placed under the mandate of France; on the south by the kingdom of the Hejaz; and on the west by the line of the Jordan and the Dead Sea; while on the east it stretches into the desert and ends--the boundary is not yet defined--where Mesopotamia begins. Trans-Jordania has a population of probably 350,000 people. It contains a few small towns and large areas of fertile land, producing excellent wheat and barley. The people are partly settled townsmen and agriculturists, partly wandering Bedouin; the latter, however, cultivate areas, more or less fixed, during certain seasons of the year. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921


On the land, you have to ask the British who audited the Land Registries and prepared the Report

, not me.

 

[docmauser1]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

 

[montelatici]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

"is the territory of Trans-Jordania" and you want to made a fool of again I see. The Emir (from Trans-Jordania) travelled from Trans-Jordania to Palestine, a different territory. See how all the propaganda you have absorbed comes to haunt you Zionist lovers.

"I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May." - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

 

[docmauser1]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

"is the territory of Trans-Jordania" and you want to made a fool of again I see. The Emir (from Trans-Jordania) travelled from Trans-Jordania to Palestine, a different territory. See how all the propaganda you have absorbed comes to haunt you Zionist lovers. "I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May." - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

Did he buy 90% of the mandate palestine and made arab settlers "saudi sheiks"?

 

[MJB12741]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

"is the territory of Trans-Jordania" and you want to made a fool of again I see. The Emir (from Trans-Jordania) travelled from Trans-Jordania to Palestine, a different territory. See how all the propaganda you have absorbed comes to haunt you Zionist lovers.

"I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May." - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

Bless you Monte for being such a good sport to keep us lauighing at you all the time. So little left for us to laugh at these days with those you support killing us infidels all over the world. Don't you agree?

 

[montelatici]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

"is the territory of Trans-Jordania" and you want to made a fool of again I see. The Emir (from Trans-Jordania) travelled from Trans-Jordania to Palestine, a different territory. See how all the propaganda you have absorbed comes to haunt you Zionist lovers.

"I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May." - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

Bless you Monte for being such a good sport to keep us lauighing at you all the time. So little left for us to laugh at these days with those you support killing us infidels all over the world. Don't you agree?

Too many facts for you I see. Don't appreciate having your Zionist myths debunked, do you. It is everyone else that is laughing at you and watching you squirm.

 

[MJB12741]

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

You really want to be made a fool of. Trans-Jordania was discussed separately in a separate section as a separate territory. As you can see its population was 350,000. You people are such fools, you ask for it. I guess you have been so brainwashed with propaganda you can't think straight, or read. LOL

Excellent! So, Transjordan was part of the mandate palestine, not yet given to emir Abdullah! Cool! 700,000 total!

"is the territory of Trans-Jordania" and you want to made a fool of again I see. The Emir (from Trans-Jordania) travelled from Trans-Jordania to Palestine, a different territory. See how all the propaganda you have absorbed comes to haunt you Zionist lovers.

"I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May." - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

Bless you Monte for being such a good sport to keep us lauighing at you all the time. So little left for us to laugh at these days with those you support killing us infidels all over the world. Don't you agree?

Too many facts for you I see. Don't appreciate having your Zionist myths debunked, do you. It is everyone else that is laughing at you and watching you squirm.

LOL! You missed your calling buddy. Should have been a stand up comic. Bye the way, how are they treating you on the funny farm?