Not according to the real history books.
The arab muslims were slaughtering Jews and Christians and then along comes WW1 and the end of Islamic control of the M.E.
Do you have some reports of such attacks in the territory that became Palestine in the previous hundred years or so?
Neither the LoN nor the British took possession of that land. It was held in trust on behalf of the citizens.
Those Jews became Palestinian citizens along with all of the Muslims and Christians who lived there at the time.
Is there a point here?
Palestine produced a surplus of food that was exported to other countries before the Zionist colonies.
The Palestinians follow the command of their false prophet and set about killing the Jews making them the aggressors.
The Jews defend their children from attack making them the defenders.
Israeli crapola.
1) how about the Hebron massacre in 1929 that brought about the Jewish groups like Irgun. Then there was Safed in 1834, Jaffa in 1921
2) The end of WW1 signified the handing over of territory from all the axis powers including Turkey. Tbhat land became the property of the LoN and under the Mandate's the land was ruled by the mandated powers until such time as the inhabitants could show their ability to govern themselves. The land was never handed to the inhabitants until 1949 when the mandate came to an end.
3) Yes as British Palestinians shown by the passports issued by the mandate, they were not citizens of a sovereign state of Palestine as that did not exist until 1988.
4) the point is history shows that you are wrong and barking up the wrong tree
5) No historical fact that shows the people producing the food as far back as the early 1800's were the Zionists invited to settle by the Ottomans. The muslims were too lazy to do the initial work in making the land fertile.
6) No fact that is shown by muslim history of the area