If I have 70 apples, 13 oranges, 15, pears, and 2 bananas, in a box, the probability of me getting an apple is greater than getting any other fruit in the box. Racism has white trying to claim the exact opposite, that even if there are 70 apples in the box, the chances of getting an orange is greater. This is dumb, but it falls in line with the cognitive dissonance whites such as yourself have.
Love me some statistics.
Suppose you had those numbers of fruit in a box. Suppose you asked one thousand people to randomly pick a piece of fruit and put it back in the box. You would expect that the results would be:
Apples - 700
Oranges - 130
Pears - 150
Bananas 30
The theoretical probability of an orange being selected would be .13 or 13%
Suppose the results were as follows:
Apples - 660
Oranges - 220
Pears - 110
Bananas 10
Now after the experiment, we know that the experimental probability of an orange being selected is .22 or 22%, much higher than expected.
The theoretical probability of a banana being selected was .03, or 3% but the experimental probability turned out to be only .01 or 1%.
So, how can we interpret that? The answer is most likely that the selection process is not random. For whatever reason oranges are being selected at a higher rate than apples.
We could just say, "So? People still picked more apples, so apples are more likely to be selected!"
True enough, but any individual apple in that box is actually less likely to be selected than an individual orange. An individual banana stands very little chance of being selected in one pick.
By the same token, even though there are more whites than blacks, an individual black is more likely to commit a crime than any individual white, if race is the only factor (and isn't it always for some folks). Also more likely to go to prison.
Most of the race activists embrace that statistic about more college age black men being in jail or prison than in college and claim that it is due to a racist criminal justice system. You might consider switching to that argument, since at least the math would be right.
You tell me about blacks being disproportionately criminal, but blacks are disproportionately in poverty and unemployed. You and others like you are too stupid to understand that racism takes a physical and psychological toll on people of color. You have not studied these aspects of racism and your opinions are based on your experience being white, never facing racism, and reading books written by some black sellout that tells you what you want to hear.
That's a much better argument than that misapplied math.
Of course racism takes a toll. Of course it does so in ways that I cannot understand. But what to do about it, without making it worse?
Rightly or wrongly, the plain fact is that you will never overcome racism by whining and bitching about it. You certainly won't overcome racism by burning down businesses. All that just feeds into racism.
Every demographic that came to this country, other than English white male landowners, came with a disadvantage due to that demographic. They all faced discrimination of some kind. They all overcame that and succeeded though hard work.
Yes, blacks started off deeper in the hole than Italians, Jews, and even Chinese rail workers. But the overwhelming majority of blacks have worked their way out of the plight of their ancestors and are successful in the system. That in spite of a shrinking vestige of racist whites who actively work to hold blacks back, and a shrinking vestige of self-hating blacks who will never stop blaming ****** for their failure to achieve what other blacks have.
BTW, that vestige of racist whites who still actively work to hold blacks back? Their name is the Democratic Party. Those are the only whites who benefit by keeping black people from succeeding. But, luckily, that aspect of the Democratic Party is finally fading.
The fact that the Democrats have switched over to "helping" illegals and people with sexual disorders is the best thing that could have happened to black folks.