Apparently you don't understand the point. 2.1 pecent of the american population were criminal offenders in 2020. 1.09 percent where white, .6 percent were black. 13 percent of the population has nothing to do with this. Accurate assessments of criminal behavior and race can and should only be measured by those who are found to be criminal offenders. That's what public school taught me.
So it did not teach you what "disproportionate" means. That's not your fault, so I won't press the issue.
Wrong. Jim Crow was bipartisan. As has been American racism. Again, it was a republican who tried to make slaver constitutional in the hopes of keeping the south from seceding. Corwin, look up the Corwin Amendment and quit lying to yourself.
Oh, I completely agree. Everyone who signed the Constitution was equally guilty. I believe that including a guarantee of slavery in our founding document instead of dealing with the issue before the colonies united as states doomed us to the horrors of the Civil War, in which Republicans died in large numbers in their righteous quest to free the slaves.
Corwin's idea to put another guarantee of slavery might have delayed the war a little, but the Republicans were too passionately committed to ending slavery and racism to allow Democrats to carry on with it much longer.
There were no Republicans who signed the Constitution, BTW. In later years, Jim Crow was a Democratic Party institution. You'd be more historically accurate to accuse Republicans of being carpetbaggers who came to the south to take advantage of uneducated (through no fault of their own) blacks in the South, than to say that they were behind Jim Crow which is just factually inaccurate.
Lol! It's funny the stories republicans try telling to deny the fact that THE SYSTEM was created to benefit whites. Do you understand the difference between a macro level issue and a micro level one? Racism is a macro level problem arguing about what you claim not to have got is a micro level argument that misses the point and it is done purposefully. Your father was able to do things those black mail carriers couldn't.
Really? What was my father able to do that those black mail carriers could not?
It's very difficult not to break zone 1 rules after reading asinine bs like this.
Do you feel that they zone 1 rules are another example of white suppression?
These are dumb, ignorant comments. Documented fact plus current behavior and attitudes such as yours is evidence of a continuing problem. And when scrubs like you can't win a debate you turn to this dumb ----. If I am pissing and moaning because of my lack of sucess, there is no such thing as success junior.
Oh, so now you claim that
have been successful? Doesn't that lend the lie to every single thing you've said on here?
Nobody black tells their kids the crap you believe. We tell our kids that they will face white racism and when they do, make certain that every white racist scrub eats their words.
What a perfect attitude to take into a job interview! Yes, you are indeed setting them up for success.
Unless the interviewer turns out to be black, as so many HR folk are. Then what? Call them an Aunt Jemima and storm out?
You idiots made what you said up because you can't face the truth. That truth is that there right wingg whites today have the same beliefs and attitudes of whites in the 1700's, 1800's and the jim crow 20th century. Your post is an example.
You guy piss and moan about aa government that has given you preference in everything, but youask me that ignorant question. You must have a mental problem
Are you sure that you are remembering the Zone 1 rules? You chose to post here instead of the Flame Zone or whatever it's called.
When other races in America have done what whites have done, come ask me that question.
No one has done what anyone else has done. Nothing is exactly the same as anything else. That's what intellectually dishonest people hang their hat on to say "that's different!"