Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you agree with the Betsy DeVos plan to fix our failing education system?
Are you talking to me or yourself?Except as regards things like liberty and rights. I hear ya'. Those things must not be important to classic liberals.
Well I'm certainly not a classic liberal.Are you talking to me or yourself?I get it now. Property rights over chattels are the important rights to classic liberals. My bad.
Too bad it didn’t teach you critical thinking skills or deductive reasoning.
You admit you can’t do much about your simple mindedness? Hey. That’s a healthy first step.Well, that's rich given that you just made a vacuous accusation without substantiation.
But, lazy retorts are the province of the simple minded. Not much I can do about that.
I mean, anyone who'd put Salinger over Kesey or Heller has some issues.
Nor an intellectual.Well I'm certainly not a classic liberal.
Text book cop out.
Congrats.
You should pay more attention to what, in fact, I wrote, I sensed in advance some simpleton would make that accusation you just made, and I clearly put it in the OP that I am also guilty of such debate sins I am eschewing in the OP, that, indeed, I do not claim any status of being a paragon of debate forum virtue. What that means, OhPleaseJustQuit, is that if someone wants me to wallow in a cesspool, I'll indulge. But, in the mean time, if you really understood the OP, I'm asking for folks that would like NOT to wallowing in cesspools on a debate forum, and I will invite them to participate in the future. But, outside of that invite silo, ALL BETS ARE OFF..
Now we get it. Knew it was there.
Ignore the veneer of civility you try to convince us is there. When you blame the other guy for your incivility, all bets are off.
"Debate"
.
You should pay more attention to what, in fact, I wrote, I sensed in advance some simpleton would make that accusation you just made, and I clearly put it in the OP that I am also guilty of such debate sins I am eschewing in the OP, that, indeed, I do not claim any status of being a paragon of debate forum virtue. What that means, OhPleaseJustQuit, is that if someone wants me to wallow in a cesspool, I'll indulge. But, in the mean time, if you really understood the OP, I'm asking for folks that would like NOT to wallowing in cesspools on a debate forum, and I will invite them to participate in the future. But, outside of that invite silo, ALL BETS ARE OFF.
Like this?But, lazy retorts are the province of the simple minded.
Impressive.
So are "The Great Gatsby" and "Atlas Shrugged" ...But that doesn't mean that they aren't dreary and banal slogs, that were vanity projects for their authors."The Catcher in the Rye" is frequently included in lists of the greatest American novels of the 20th century.
Yet again, your OP was lacking substance. Mere words, spewed in a semblance of prose, does not an OP make.
Shallow liar ^ caught in a lie.You should pay more attention to what, in fact, I wrote, I sensed in advance some simpleton would make that accusation you just made, and I clearly put it in the OP that I am also guilty of such debate sins I am eschewing in the OP, that, indeed, I do not claim any status of being a paragon of debate forum virtue. What that means, OhPleaseJustQuit, is that if someone wants me to wallow in a cesspool, I'll indulge. But, in the mean time, if you really understood the OP, I'm asking for folks that would like NOT to wallowing in cesspools on a debate forum, and I will invite them to participate in the future. But, outside of that invite silo, ALL BETS ARE OFF.
What the fuck are you talking about? THe OP was just looking for folks that want to debate, and not wallow in petty insults, etc. There was no real argument put up for debate in the first place
He isn’t on speaking terms with brevity.Brevity is your friend, you superfluously redundant buffoon...
