Debate Now Who are the serious debaters on this forum?

[cnm]

I didn't see that one coming, and yet you want the government to fund the not working lazy people.

You know how it's a conservative trope private enterprise is always more efficient? Put America's wars out for tender. None of this socialistic armed forces owned by the people shit.

 

[cnm]

Obvious, regardless.

You're very quiet on the 'you?' bit.

Funny that.

So, are you an intellectual?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Because there is circular logic implied in your sig, which destroys your credibility.

Your credibility, and NOT 'religion', per se, is the thing that was in play in my rebuttal.

Have you determined how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, yet?

I know you were working on it.

 

[cnm]

Maybe some God-hating lib who is pissed that he’s going to Hell

Who on earth could hate Brahma, Odin and Baal?

 

[Rumpole]

It appears that someone has stolen my “sig” as you call it

Maybe some God-hating lib who is pissed that he’s going to Hell

I’m flattered that it made such an impression on you even after its no longer here

My rebuttal is not proof that 'I hate God'. Nor do you have proof of such.

I do contend that God cannot be proven, and anyone using circular logic in that attempt, is worthy of being called out on it. Moreover, I'm a pantheist, so I'm NOT an atheist. However, I would never attribute 'atheism' has hating god, unless someone actually comes out and says it, like Bill Maher does. I do not believe in a personal God, however, I've seen no evidence, but you are implying I 'hate', That's a slur, and a lie. That makes you a liar. My God is the whole of the Universe, that the Universe is God, in it's entirety, and I do believe in the eternal soul, that life has a spiritual basis, and that spiritual basis, is the essence that is God, but it is not an 'intelligence'.

You really need to learn how to interpret the written word, and how to articulate with more accuracy.

 

[Mac-7]

Who on earth could hate Brahma, Odin and Baal?

If you want to hate God its no skin off my nose

 

[Rumpole]

Have you determined how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, yet?

I know you were working on it.

Grow up.

 

[Mac-7]

I do contend that God cannot be proven,

Has someone tried to prove it to you?

If so it wasnt me

I’m not a Christian that really cares what happens to you

Yes I should, but I dont

 

[Rumpole]

My goodness, I am just so non-plussed by that .

This is affecting me ALMOST as much when a poster with the same degree of natural charisma as you called "ryecatcher" hands out his "idiotgrams".

Since you're only interested in trading insults, off to ignore land you go. Congratulations, you've earned it!

 

[Rumpole]

My goodness, your attempts at smack are even worse than your pedantic drivel.

Well, at least it's pedantic. Yours is plain drivel. Much worse.

 

[Rumpole]

Has someone tried to prove it to you?

If so it wasnt me

I’m not a Christian that really cares what happens to you

Yes I should, but I dont

It's a fair inference drawn from your sig. Moreover 'proof' isn't a precise term to describe it, it's more like 'attempt to persuade the existence of God is implied' in your sig. That would be the inference I think is fair to draw from your sig. It's not that big of a deal, really.

 

[Mac-7]

It's a fair inference drawn from your sig. Moreover 'proof' isn't a precise term to describe it, it's more like 'attempt to persuade the existence of God is implied' in your sig. That would be the inference I think is fair to draw from your sig. It's not that big of a deal, really.

Since I am not pandering to you disbelief in God I dont care what you think

 

[cnm]

Obvious, regardless.

I suppose that's the mark of an intellectual, pointing out the obvious. Like expediently enabling chattel slavery is the mark of a classic liberal, a la the founders.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Well, at least it's pedantic. Yours is plain drivel. Much worse.

You sound like a high school sophomore whose mother just bought him a thesaurus, and is eager to use it

This is no substitute for learning to write, no matter how you puff up and bloviate.

 

[Orangecat]

So, are you an intellectual?

Nah, I'm just a perceptive observer.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Nah, I'm just a perceptive observer.

When leftists use the term "intellectual", what they really mean is tedious, lacking a sense of humor and slavishly unoriginal.

 

[jc456]

You know how it's a conservative trope private enterprise is always more efficient? Put America's wars out for tender. None of this socialistic armed forces owned by the people shit.

who would they report to?

 

[jc456]

No, you have to be specific. But, a gov program should be run by the gov.

LOL. How does a government program start up? Who provides the funding?

 

[BackAgain]

Since you're only interested in trading insults, off to ignore land you go. Congratulations, you've earned it!

Brave Sir Robin bravely runs away — again.

 

[The Duke]

I guess expediently accepting and enabling chattel slavery is a classic liberal position.

You guess wrong, and you've been indoctrinated.