Who Are The Palestinians?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Likud is just another name for Irgun




Do you mean like hamas is just another name for iran terrorists
No.




So it must be another name for A.Q. or ISIS or M.B or is it just all of them wrapped up in one bundle and presented as a typical ISLAMONAZI terrorist group

Nope.

America, Israel & all the other Western nations have had it with all the radical Islamist terrorist groups of the Middle East. If this trend continues it will soon be Islam Vs. the entire civilized world. Yet the fact is only the Muslims themselves can put an end to it & save many lives by killing their own radicals & gaining world respect for their religion.

Really? Zionist Israel seems to be supporting ISIS according to this article:

UN Report Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS

Sadly America, Britain and France created the problem, so we're all reaping what our forefathers and their governments sowed. Maybe we should do our bit to help our by killing all our own Christian and Jewish radicals and fundamentalists?[/QUOTE]






Reported by who, ISLAMONAZI SCUM of course. No actual proof apart from unsubstantiated ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA.
Sadly the paedophile prophet created the problem and now muslims are having to deal with the violence, killing, rape and theft by fellow muslims.
 
Considering the praise and celebration of the paris terrorist, France might want to boycott gaza.
 



On investigation of the source I find this

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

User:Siddiqui


Another Fail by you to demonise the Jews, must try harder and must get real facts and not ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

As usual, you are lying. No user was blocked. Why do you always lie.
 



On investigation of the source I find this

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

User:Siddiqui


Another Fail by you to demonise the Jews, must try harder and must get real facts and not ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

As usual, you are lying. No user was blocked. Why do you always lie.


Do you want the Wikipedia page then Abdul in full so you can grovel on your belly for making false accusations



Here you go Abdul, time to eat crow methinks and apologise for your behaviour

User Siddiqui - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 

I'm no fan of orthodoxy and extremism, but fortunately it is a small segment and not support by most Israelis. They are not the heroes like extremists and radicals are in islam or more specifically gaza.

Not only are they heroes to the Jews, some have been Prime Ministers of Israel. Menachem Begin, for example.




AND who are you to complain when you hold up the worlds second worst terrorists as shining examples of how to gain power and destroy a country.
 
15th post



On investigation of the source I find this

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

User:Siddiqui


Another Fail by you to demonise the Jews, must try harder and must get real facts and not ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

As usual, you are lying. No user was blocked. Why do you always lie.


Do you want the Wikipedia page then Abdul in full so you can grovel on your belly for making false accusations



Here you go Abdul, time to eat crow methinks and apologise for your behaviour

User Siddiqui - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Doubt it, since Siddiqui never wrote the article in question and he was blocked from editing, primarily for infringing copyrights on multiple occasions as opposed to any accuracy issues. That, and given the article itself is not under any sanction for bias, your post is irrelevant as is your sad attempt to discredit the article.
 



On investigation of the source I find this

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

User:Siddiqui


Another Fail by you to demonise the Jews, must try harder and must get real facts and not ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

As usual, you are lying. No user was blocked. Why do you always lie.


Do you want the Wikipedia page then Abdul in full so you can grovel on your belly for making false accusations



Here you go Abdul, time to eat crow methinks and apologise for your behaviour

User Siddiqui - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Doubt it, since Siddiqui never wrote the article in question and he was blocked from editing, primarily for infringing copyrights on multiple occasions as opposed to any accuracy issues. That, and given the article itself is not under any sanction for bias, your post is irrelevant as is your sad attempt to discredit the article.




He edited the article and others to meet with his ISLAMONAZI views, that was why he was banned from wiki. Read the reasons for his ban, mainly because he had multiple accounts and abuse. So making the source suspect and not usable as indicative of the truth. It is tainted by ISLAMONAZI TAMPERING and PROPAGANDA, which is much more common on Wikipedia than anything coming from the Jews
 



On investigation of the source I find this

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

User:Siddiqui


Another Fail by you to demonise the Jews, must try harder and must get real facts and not ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

As usual, you are lying. No user was blocked. Why do you always lie.


Do you want the Wikipedia page then Abdul in full so you can grovel on your belly for making false accusations



Here you go Abdul, time to eat crow methinks and apologise for your behaviour

User Siddiqui - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Doubt it, since Siddiqui never wrote the article in question and he was blocked from editing, primarily for infringing copyrights on multiple occasions as opposed to any accuracy issues. That, and given the article itself is not under any sanction for bias, your post is irrelevant as is your sad attempt to discredit the article.




He edited the article and others to meet with his ISLAMONAZI views, that was why he was banned from wiki. Read the reasons for his ban, mainly because he had multiple accounts and abuse. So making the source suspect and not usable as indicative of the truth. It is tainted by ISLAMONAZI TAMPERING and PROPAGANDA, which is much more common on Wikipedia than anything coming from the Jews

The flaw with your argument is that in your mind Muslims are "stupid" and "savage" "living in the middle ages" yet, bizarrely, they're suddenly capable of tampering with Wikepedia, when it shows information you disagree with, what a jerk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom