Who Are The Palestinians?

[Phoenall]

When in fact the entire reason (multiple) for the separation, partition, and quarantine is actually based on the protection and preservation of a minority culture (Jewish) --- a majority group (Arab) attempting the hostile domination in favor of its members over a minority group (Israelis) which have been historically --- the disadvantaged culture attempting to establish a safe haven and permanent homeland for the protection of the group.

This is a Zionist logical fallacy akin to, "let's put all our eggs into one basket". Judaism survived only because it was a scattered religious group. If all the world's Jewish population only lived in Poland in 1939 for example...oops. The same applies to Zionist Israel today.

And this is nothing more than ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA and BLOOD LIBELS put about because islam is losing its way in the world. If all the worlds "moderate" muslims were placed in one hut in Ramallah you would be able to execute them without any blood being shed.

 

[Challenger]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

 

[MJB12741]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Oh now I get it. That's why the member nations of the UN approved & voted for it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Who are the Palestinians?

Janet Mikhail

The stream of people in and out of Janet Mikhail's Ramallah office is endless. The mayor of what has become the administrative centre of the Palestinian Territories is unusual in almost every way - a woman, a Christian, unmarried and essentially chosen by Hamas.

In 2005, the city held its first municipal elections in almost three decades. Mikhail ran as part of an independent list called Ramallah for All. The list won six council seats, while the Fatah-affiliated Watan list also won six, and Hamas' Change and Reform list won three. It was the decision of the Hamas list to back Mikhail over the Fatah candidate that brought her to power.

"I used to work as a school headmistress, so I am known by the citizens here. They encouraged me, and my family encouraged me, too - so I went for the elections," says Mikhail. She dismisses suggestions that her gender is an impediment to her work.

"It is the opposite," Mikhail, 66, says. "The Palestinian woman is a strong woman and she can lead in Palestine. In Ramallah especially, there are a lot of women who have the role of president or head of NGO [non-governmental organisation] associations."

There are five female ministers in the Palestinian cabinet, and women have long played a more active role in society than in many other countries in the region. Literacy rates for females are around 90 per cent - only slightly lower than the rate for males — and girls are now more likely to enrol in secondary school than boys in the Palestinian Territories.

Janet Mikhail is more than just the mayor of Ramallah The National

 

[toastman]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

 

[Hossfly]

Let the truth be known to all.

Who Are The Palestinians What And Where Is Palestine

The current Palestinian are no different than they were in from the olden days. Except nowadays they do it to music.

Propaganda department of Hamas creates a choreographed musical video clip depicting murder of yeshiva student.


Hamas's creative department has come up with a video clip that features a choreographed, musical scene in which terrorists murder a Jewish yeshiva student.



The clip shows two people acting out the roles of Jews in a synagogue or yeshiva, apparently studying Torah, but doing so somewhat bizarrely next to a midel of the Al Aqsa mosque. A terrorist enters and stabs one of them.



This is followed by a similar scene in which a troupe of dancing terrorists cartwheels its way into the hall and shoots the yeshiva student.



This is not the first Hamas video encouraging the murder of Jews and providing instructions for how to do so.


Hamas Choreography Features Synagogue Stabbing - Defense Security - News - Arutz Sheva
Video is in link above

 

[toastman]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

 

[Kondor3]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

It doesn't matter.

1948-1949 changed all that.

The Jews carved-out a Nation for themselves, not just a 'national homeland'.

The Muslim-Arabs of Old Palestine ran like rabbits, trusting to their lying sack-of-shit Muslim-Arab neighbors' promises to do their fighting for them.

The only 'nakba' at-work here is The Great Arab Skeddadle of 1948.

"He who pees his pants, then runs away, lives to regret it, for many a day."

Vae victus.

 

[Phoenall]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Another ISLAMONAZI moron that does not know how to interpret 1920's treaty speech. The national home of the Jews was a phrase used because they did not have a name for it. Just as Palestine was the term used for the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE. No computers back then so the treaties were written by hand and any means of making the reports shorter were used.
The NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS was the same thing as the Balfour declaration, their homeland.

 

[Phoenall]

Who are the Palestinians?

Janet Mikhail

The stream of people in and out of Janet Mikhail's Ramallah office is endless. The mayor of what has become the administrative centre of the Palestinian Territories is unusual in almost every way - a woman, a Christian, unmarried and essentially chosen by Hamas.

In 2005, the city held its first municipal elections in almost three decades. Mikhail ran as part of an independent list called Ramallah for All. The list won six council seats, while the Fatah-affiliated Watan list also won six, and Hamas' Change and Reform list won three. It was the decision of the Hamas list to back Mikhail over the Fatah candidate that brought her to power.

"I used to work as a school headmistress, so I am known by the citizens here. They encouraged me, and my family encouraged me, too - so I went for the elections," says Mikhail. She dismisses suggestions that her gender is an impediment to her work.

"It is the opposite," Mikhail, 66, says. "The Palestinian woman is a strong woman and she can lead in Palestine. In Ramallah especially, there are a lot of women who have the role of president or head of NGO [non-governmental organisation] associations."

There are five female ministers in the Palestinian cabinet, and women have long played a more active role in society than in many other countries in the region. Literacy rates for females are around 90 per cent - only slightly lower than the rate for males — and girls are now more likely to enrol in secondary school than boys in the Palestinian Territories.

Janet Mikhail is more than just the mayor of Ramallah The National

Ten year old PROPAGANDA, is this the best you can come up with ? ? ? ?

 

[Phoenall]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

LINK

 

[Phoenall]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

Which means nothing as the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE is still in force, and the British government could not make that decision on its own

 

[Challenger]

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

Which means nothing as the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE is still in force, and the British government could not make that decision on its own

Where does it state in the Mandate for Palestine that Britain had to create a Jewish state in Palestine?

 

[Challenger]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Another ISLAMONAZI moron that does not know how to interpret 1920's treaty speech. The national home of the Jews was a phrase used because they did not have a name for it. Just as Palestine was the term used for the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE. No computers back then so the treaties were written by hand and any means of making the reports shorter were used.
The NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS was the same thing as the Balfour declaration, their homeland.

"National home" was used because the British government would not countenance a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine, period and the Zionists were well aware of that fact. One of the best objective accounts of what went on in the background can be found here: The Balfour Declaration The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict Amazon.co.uk Jonathan Schneer 9781408809709 Books

Oh, and before you go off on one of your stupid rants, Professor Schneer's book, The Balfour Declaration: The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which won a National Jewish Book Award in 2010.

 

[Challenger]

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

It doesn't matter.

1948-1949 changed all that.

The Jews carved-out a Nation for themselves, not just a 'national homeland'.

The Muslim-Arabs of Old Palestine ran like rabbits, trusting to their lying sack-of-shit Muslim-Arab neighbors' promises to do their fighting for them.

The only 'nakba' at-work here is The Great Arab Skeddadle of 1948.

"He who pees his pants, then runs away, lives to regret it, for many a day."

Vae victus.

There's another old saying, "What goes around, comes around".

 

[Phoenall]

How do YOU know what they meant when they said national home ? Seems like you are making up your own definition.

Because the British, who were charged with creating the Jewish National Home under its mandate, said that they were not to create a Jewish state.

So they didn't.

Link ?

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The Avalon Project British White Paper of 1939

Which means nothing as the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE is still in force, and the British government could not make that decision on its own

Where does it state in the Mandate for Palestine that Britain had to create a Jewish state in Palestine?

It doesn't as Britain did not have that power, what it say is the land will be handed over to the Jews on fulfilment of the Mandate for them to RECREATE THE NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS. This translates as nation or state in anyones language. Here are the exact words of the Mandate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine_(legal_instrument)


The preamble of the mandate document declared:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country

 

[Phoenall]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Another ISLAMONAZI moron that does not know how to interpret 1920's treaty speech. The national home of the Jews was a phrase used because they did not have a name for it. Just as Palestine was the term used for the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE. No computers back then so the treaties were written by hand and any means of making the reports shorter were used.
The NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS was the same thing as the Balfour declaration, their homeland.

"National home" was used because the British government would not countenance a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine, period and the Zionists were well aware of that fact. One of the best objective accounts of what went on in the background can be found here: The Balfour Declaration The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict Amazon.co.uk Jonathan Schneer 9781408809709 Books

Oh, and before you go off on one of your stupid rants, Professor Schneer's book, The Balfour Declaration: The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which won a National Jewish Book Award in 2010.

WRONG AGAIN as National Home was used because they had no other name for what was proposed. Just as they had no other name for the mandate so called it Palestine, a shortened version of THE MANDATE FOR PALESTINE

 

[Challenger]

The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a rare example of the reverse-Apartheid in which the regional Majority Population (multiple Arab Jihadist and Fedayeen) are attempting to forcibly dislodge, dissect, and disburse a surrounded Minority Population attempting to establish, protect and defend, a National Home as originally conceived by the Principle Allied Powers nearly a century ago.

Nonsense. The "National Home" was concieved as just that; no more than a "tribal homeland" where Jewish people, at that time considered a "race", could settle. Not one of the Principle Allied powers conceived the idea of an independant soveriegn Jewish state in Palestine.

Another ISLAMONAZI moron that does not know how to interpret 1920's treaty speech. The national home of the Jews was a phrase used because they did not have a name for it. Just as Palestine was the term used for the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE. No computers back then so the treaties were written by hand and any means of making the reports shorter were used.
The NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS was the same thing as the Balfour declaration, their homeland.

"National home" was used because the British government would not countenance a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine, period and the Zionists were well aware of that fact. One of the best objective accounts of what went on in the background can be found here: The Balfour Declaration The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict Amazon.co.uk Jonathan Schneer 9781408809709 Books

Oh, and before you go off on one of your stupid rants, Professor Schneer's book, The Balfour Declaration: The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which won a National Jewish Book Award in 2010.

WRONG AGAIN as National Home was used because they had no other name for what was proposed. Just as they had no other name for the mandate so called it Palestine, a shortened version of THE MANDATE FOR PALESTINE

Prove it.