Who Are The Palestinians?

Status
Not open for further replies.
figures are from NABA

Never heard of them, care to provide a link?

National Association British Arabs

OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
 
Never heard of them, care to provide a link?

National Association British Arabs

OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.
 
National Association British Arabs

OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.
 
OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.
See post #3056, I can't be bothered with you.
 
OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.
 
Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.

How is retaliating against Palestinian terrorism considered terrorism ?

The Israeli army destroys buildings with weapons, buildings with terrorists and other hostile targets. Terrorism is attacking without distinguishing between civilian and combatant in order to bring fear among people, in order to achieve a political or religious goal. Basically, EXACTLY what Hamas does.

You aren't there when the air force commanders are explaining to their pilots what targets to it. You are not there when the commanders explain the mission to their soldiers.
All you do is spew Palestinian propaganda day in day out. Not to mention you support people who cheer and hand out candy upon hearing that innocent people have been killed.
 

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.

How is retaliating against Palestinian terrorism considered terrorism ?

The Israeli army destroys buildings with weapons, buildings with terrorists and other hostile targets. Terrorism is attacking without distinguishing between civilian and combatant in order to bring fear among people, in order to achieve a political or religious goal. Basically, EXACTLY what Hamas does.

You aren't there when the air force commanders are explaining to their pilots what targets to it. You are not there when the commanders explain the mission to their soldiers.
All you do is spew Palestinian propaganda day in day out. Not to mention you support people who cheer and hand out candy upon hearing that innocent people have been killed.

Israel bombs schools that are filled with women and children, killing thousands at a time. That is intentional terrorism in order to terrorize the non-Jews into meekly accepting Jew oppression and occupation.

"US 'appalled' by 'disgraceful' Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school"

The US called that attack “totally unacceptable and totally indefensible”.

US appalled by disgraceful Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school World news The Guardian
 
OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

But but haven't you heard the news? You see, the noble peace loving, life loving Palestinians of Hamas & the PA are not terrorists, they're "freedom fighters." It's called Palestinian mentality. Heh Heh!
 
Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.

How is retaliating against Palestinian terrorism considered terrorism ?

The Israeli army destroys buildings with weapons, buildings with terrorists and other hostile targets. Terrorism is attacking without distinguishing between civilian and combatant in order to bring fear among people, in order to achieve a political or religious goal. Basically, EXACTLY what Hamas does.

You aren't there when the air force commanders are explaining to their pilots what targets to it. You are not there when the commanders explain the mission to their soldiers.
All you do is spew Palestinian propaganda day in day out. Not to mention you support people who cheer and hand out candy upon hearing that innocent people have been killed.

Israel bombs schools that are filled with women and children, killing thousands at a time. That is intentional terrorism in order to terrorize the non-Jews into meekly accepting Jew oppression and occupation.

"US 'appalled' by 'disgraceful' Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school"

The US called that attack “totally unacceptable and totally indefensible”.

US appalled by disgraceful Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school World news The Guardian
The U.S has killed 500 times more civilians in a fraction of the time. Gaza is a tiny tiny slither of land. Any school that was hit was hit by an errant shell from an artillery battery or tank, not a fighter jet. Stuff like this happens, and it's tragic.
But unlike Palestinians, Israelis don't cheer and celebrate upon hearing that innocent civilians have been killed.
 
Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:
:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

But but haven't you heard the news? You see, the noble peace loving, life loving Palestinians of Hamas & the PA are not terrorists, they're "freedom fighters." It's called Palestinian mentality. Heh Heh!

No, it's called rational human behaviour when threatened with occupation, oppression, humiliation and brutality on a daily basis. It's what the Polish AK, French FFI and Maquis, Legion Belge, Czech UVOD, Danish Freedom Council, Greek Democratic National Army and ELAS & EDES and many, many more resistance organisations did during WW2. All of them were called Terrorists by the Nazis.
 
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.

How is retaliating against Palestinian terrorism considered terrorism ?

The Israeli army destroys buildings with weapons, buildings with terrorists and other hostile targets. Terrorism is attacking without distinguishing between civilian and combatant in order to bring fear among people, in order to achieve a political or religious goal. Basically, EXACTLY what Hamas does.

You aren't there when the air force commanders are explaining to their pilots what targets to it. You are not there when the commanders explain the mission to their soldiers.
All you do is spew Palestinian propaganda day in day out. Not to mention you support people who cheer and hand out candy upon hearing that innocent people have been killed.

Israel bombs schools that are filled with women and children, killing thousands at a time. That is intentional terrorism in order to terrorize the non-Jews into meekly accepting Jew oppression and occupation.

"US 'appalled' by 'disgraceful' Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school"

The US called that attack “totally unacceptable and totally indefensible”.

US appalled by disgraceful Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school World news The Guardian
The U.S has killed 500 times more civilians in a fraction of the time. Gaza is a tiny tiny slither of land. Any school that was hit was hit by an errant shell from an artillery battery or tank, not a fighter jet. Stuff like this happens, and it's tragic.
But unlike Palestinians, Israelis don't cheer and celebrate upon hearing that innocent civilians have been killed.

Bragging that your country has killed 500 times more civillians in a fraction of the time is perhaps a true reflection of your mindset, but to normal people it's sickening. Oh, and Google Israelis celebrating the attack on Gaza, you'll find that your statement is at best naive, at worst an outright lie.
 
Also, there was no "Palestine" sovereign nation EVER. It was just a part of the Ottoman Empire before the Brits came.

Maybe not, but there was a sovereign Palestinian state Daher el-Omar - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

He was Governor of Safad, Sheikh of Acre and Galilee, Emir of Nazareth, a feudal lord

Druze had a few semi-automonous sanjuks under the ottomans, but they were not states. Most of what is today Lebanon was also semi-autonomous, but when Lebanon became an actual state from the french mandate, the lines changed.
Acre was not a state let along a "palestinian" state. It was a druze stonghold.

It was for a time an independant Muslim state in Northern Palestine, like it or not.

ACRE was autonomous, not independent. There was no palestine state.

Independant of Ottoman rule and supported by both Egypt and Russia from the 1760's until 1775 The ottomans recognised his rule by confering the title "Sheikh of Acre, Emir of Nazareth, Tiberias, Safed, and Sheikh of all Galilee" on him. Sheikh: "...a man of vast power, and nobility, and it is used strictly for the royal families of the middle east." "Emir": ruler of an Emirate which is a sovereign Principality. Sounds pretty independant and autonomous to me.





But no mention in all that of Palestine
 
figures are from NABA

Never heard of them, care to provide a link?

National Association British Arabs

OK found the site, and an article on the 2011 census, but nothing about 500,000 Christian Palestinians in the UK in 2014, care to help me out? NABA British Arabs Association

Yeah, the National Association of British Arabs. REAL good website there. :lol: Oh no, they wouldn't have a biased view of anything, right? :tongue:

You do realize that the NABA site was used as "proof" by Ariscat, one of the most strident Zionist fundamentalists that post here. You really should read the thread before having knee jerk reactions that do nothing else but confirm you are a knucklehead. By the way, 500 thousand Palestinians did not go to Britain in 2014 as claimed by that other knucklehead, Phoney.



Are you a member of Her Majesties Immigration service. There 275,000 legal immigrations last year , about double that for illegal and asylum seekers. And the majority were arabs
 
He was Governor of Safad, Sheikh of Acre and Galilee, Emir of Nazareth, a feudal lord

Druze had a few semi-automonous sanjuks under the ottomans, but they were not states. Most of what is today Lebanon was also semi-autonomous, but when Lebanon became an actual state from the french mandate, the lines changed.
Acre was not a state let along a "palestinian" state. It was a druze stonghold.

It was for a time an independant Muslim state in Northern Palestine, like it or not.

ACRE was autonomous, not independent. There was no palestine state.

Independant of Ottoman rule and supported by both Egypt and Russia from the 1760's until 1775 The ottomans recognised his rule by confering the title "Sheikh of Acre, Emir of Nazareth, Tiberias, Safed, and Sheikh of all Galilee" on him. Sheikh: "...a man of vast power, and nobility, and it is used strictly for the royal families of the middle east." "Emir": ruler of an Emirate which is a sovereign Principality. Sounds pretty independant and autonomous to me.

It is the title of a tribal leader, something like a "chief", "sir" or in some cases like "lord". There are hundreds of sheiks around today through the region.
Does not make him a king of palestine it just makes him leader of the sanjuk. They collect the taxes of the area and get a percentage before giving the taxes to the Ottoman. It is bit like being the duke of cambridge, he gets an income from cambridge instead of being paid by the queen.

It is a feudal lord of a county, not country

Instead of understanding the system and times you (pl.) keep grasping at straws. Acre was not palestine.

The laziness of poster to not check facts before posting is shameful. It takes seconds. They would rather argue about nonsense for days than learn the facts in less than a minute.

Arabia - Arab Titles of Rank - Sheyk Sheik Emeer Emir Sultan

I don't know or remember everything or not sure how to phrase certain things, but I have an advantage to know what I am looking for. So it take others a few more seconds to check or double check before posting. It still takes less time than typing out a post or reading one.

Why should other posters do your homework for you? Think before opening your mouth. A political forum is not the place to be making up fiction......unless you're going to run for office :)

Stick to the way things are, not the way you want them to be

Looks like someone's upset you. :)

Regarding Sheikh, the literal meaning is "elder" someone whose hair has gone white. It is a title of respect and nowdays can apply to any "leader" of a family through to a tribe or settlement up to a full kingdom. The clue was in the title, i.e. "Sheikh of all Galilee" meant ruler of All Galilee. It was for a time apparently reserved strictly for royalty in the Arabian Peninsula, but to be fair I'm not sure how strict the Saudi family are about that now. There has never been any feudal connotation to the title and the leader of a Sanjak was a Bey not a Sheikh. You seem to be confusing Arab titles with Turkish ones.



But still no mention of Palestine by name
 
It was for a time an independant Muslim state in Northern Palestine, like it or not.

ACRE was autonomous, not independent. There was no palestine state.

Independant of Ottoman rule and supported by both Egypt and Russia from the 1760's until 1775 The ottomans recognised his rule by confering the title "Sheikh of Acre, Emir of Nazareth, Tiberias, Safed, and Sheikh of all Galilee" on him. Sheikh: "...a man of vast power, and nobility, and it is used strictly for the royal families of the middle east." "Emir": ruler of an Emirate which is a sovereign Principality. Sounds pretty independant and autonomous to me.

It is the title of a tribal leader, something like a "chief", "sir" or in some cases like "lord". There are hundreds of sheiks around today through the region.
Does not make him a king of palestine it just makes him leader of the sanjuk. They collect the taxes of the area and get a percentage before giving the taxes to the Ottoman. It is bit like being the duke of cambridge, he gets an income from cambridge instead of being paid by the queen.

It is a feudal lord of a county, not country

Instead of understanding the system and times you (pl.) keep grasping at straws. Acre was not palestine.

The laziness of poster to not check facts before posting is shameful. It takes seconds. They would rather argue about nonsense for days than learn the facts in less than a minute.

Arabia - Arab Titles of Rank - Sheyk Sheik Emeer Emir Sultan

I don't know or remember everything or not sure how to phrase certain things, but I have an advantage to know what I am looking for. So it take others a few more seconds to check or double check before posting. It still takes less time than typing out a post or reading one.

Why should other posters do your homework for you? Think before opening your mouth. A political forum is not the place to be making up fiction......unless you're going to run for office :)

Stick to the way things are, not the way you want them to be

Looks like someone's upset you. :)

Regarding Sheikh, the literal meaning is "elder" someone whose hair has gone white. It is a title of respect and nowdays can apply to any "leader" of a family through to a tribe or settlement up to a full kingdom. The clue was in the title, i.e. "Sheikh of all Galilee" meant ruler of All Galilee. It was for a time apparently reserved strictly for royalty in the Arabian Peninsula, but to be fair I'm not sure how strict the Saudi family are about that now. There has never been any feudal connotation to the title and the leader of a Sanjak was a Bey not a Sheikh. You seem to be confusing Arab titles with Turkish ones.



But still no mention of Palestine by name

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

But but haven't you heard the news? You see, the noble peace loving, life loving Palestinians of Hamas & the PA are not terrorists, they're "freedom fighters." It's called Palestinian mentality. Heh Heh!

No, it's called rational human behaviour when threatened with occupation, oppression, humiliation and brutality on a daily basis. It's what the Polish AK, French FFI and Maquis, Legion Belge, Czech UVOD, Danish Freedom Council, Greek Democratic National Army and ELAS & EDES and many, many more resistance organisations did during WW2. All of them were called Terrorists by the Nazis.





And once again you ignore the Jews who have faced just that from the arab muslims for the last 1400 years. So what the Israeli's are doig according to you is "rational human behaviour"
 
15th post
I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

The Jews in Palestine used terrorist tactics to accomplish their goals, the King David Hotel bombing is just one example. Some of their Prime Ministers had done time in prison for terrorist activities. And clearly, current Israelis use terror to force the Palestinian to accept occupation and oppression without resisting. Very hypocritical supporting Jewish terrorism while railing against Gentile terrorism.

How is retaliating against Palestinian terrorism considered terrorism ?

The Israeli army destroys buildings with weapons, buildings with terrorists and other hostile targets. Terrorism is attacking without distinguishing between civilian and combatant in order to bring fear among people, in order to achieve a political or religious goal. Basically, EXACTLY what Hamas does.

You aren't there when the air force commanders are explaining to their pilots what targets to it. You are not there when the commanders explain the mission to their soldiers.
All you do is spew Palestinian propaganda day in day out. Not to mention you support people who cheer and hand out candy upon hearing that innocent people have been killed.

Israel bombs schools that are filled with women and children, killing thousands at a time. That is intentional terrorism in order to terrorize the non-Jews into meekly accepting Jew oppression and occupation.

"US 'appalled' by 'disgraceful' Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school"

The US called that attack “totally unacceptable and totally indefensible”.

US appalled by disgraceful Israeli shelling of Gaza UN school World news The Guardian
The U.S has killed 500 times more civilians in a fraction of the time. Gaza is a tiny tiny slither of land. Any school that was hit was hit by an errant shell from an artillery battery or tank, not a fighter jet. Stuff like this happens, and it's tragic.
But unlike Palestinians, Israelis don't cheer and celebrate upon hearing that innocent civilians have been killed.

Bragging that your country has killed 500 times more civillians in a fraction of the time is perhaps a true reflection of your mindset, but to normal people it's sickening. Oh, and Google Israelis celebrating the attack on Gaza, you'll find that your statement is at best naive, at worst an outright lie.





Wouldn't you celebrate if the constant threat of attack was lifted ? ? ? ? ? ?
 
"Christians were so thin on the Ground until at least the 4C and then they were mostly IMMIGRANTS"

Usual Phoney bullshit. He just makes things up.

"The arab muslims have shown that they cant freely pursue their economic, social or cultural development. They cant even tie their own shoelace"

The Arab Muslims of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Qatar, Dubai, Kuwait, UAE, sem to do ok.

"They are the ones delaying their independence because they know they are not ready, which is why they want a scapegoat ( the UN ) when it goes tits up."

Is the UN holding the Palestinians in the Gulags of the West bank and Gaza and is the UN controlling the land borders, air space and territorial sea of those Gulags?

"Attack a nation and you can expect to be retaliated to,"

Then, after invading, settling and occupying Palestine (coming all the way from Europe), why are Israelis surprised that the Christians and Muslims are resisting the invasion?

Because they bever invaded Palestine. An invasion is a military offensive.
The 'European Jewish invasion' is Palestinian propaganda.

Invasion =
1. An act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2. The entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as in a disease.
3. Entrance as if to take possession or overrun, as in, "the annual invasion of the resort by tourists".
4. Infringement by intrusion.

Take your pick, invasions aren't necessarily military in nature.
None of those apply to European Jewish Immigration.

Definitions 2. and, or 3. certainly do.
 
They came from Europe, settled an area of the Middle East then evicted the Christians and Muslims that lived in that area and took the land that the non-Jews had lived on for thousands of years through armed conflict. That is an invasion.
No they didn't

They immigrated to the region, got attacked by 5 Arab armies INCLUDING the Palestinian Arabs, and then expelled some of the Palestinians, who were trying to expel the Jews..
If a European Jewish army came to Palestine through a military offensive, THAT'S an invasion. But that's not what happened,
:bsflag:
 
ACRE was autonomous, not independent. There was no palestine state.

Independant of Ottoman rule and supported by both Egypt and Russia from the 1760's until 1775 The ottomans recognised his rule by confering the title "Sheikh of Acre, Emir of Nazareth, Tiberias, Safed, and Sheikh of all Galilee" on him. Sheikh: "...a man of vast power, and nobility, and it is used strictly for the royal families of the middle east." "Emir": ruler of an Emirate which is a sovereign Principality. Sounds pretty independant and autonomous to me.

It is the title of a tribal leader, something like a "chief", "sir" or in some cases like "lord". There are hundreds of sheiks around today through the region.
Does not make him a king of palestine it just makes him leader of the sanjuk. They collect the taxes of the area and get a percentage before giving the taxes to the Ottoman. It is bit like being the duke of cambridge, he gets an income from cambridge instead of being paid by the queen.

It is a feudal lord of a county, not country

Instead of understanding the system and times you (pl.) keep grasping at straws. Acre was not palestine.

The laziness of poster to not check facts before posting is shameful. It takes seconds. They would rather argue about nonsense for days than learn the facts in less than a minute.

Arabia - Arab Titles of Rank - Sheyk Sheik Emeer Emir Sultan

I don't know or remember everything or not sure how to phrase certain things, but I have an advantage to know what I am looking for. So it take others a few more seconds to check or double check before posting. It still takes less time than typing out a post or reading one.

Why should other posters do your homework for you? Think before opening your mouth. A political forum is not the place to be making up fiction......unless you're going to run for office :)

Stick to the way things are, not the way you want them to be

Looks like someone's upset you. :)

Regarding Sheikh, the literal meaning is "elder" someone whose hair has gone white. It is a title of respect and nowdays can apply to any "leader" of a family through to a tribe or settlement up to a full kingdom. The clue was in the title, i.e. "Sheikh of all Galilee" meant ruler of All Galilee. It was for a time apparently reserved strictly for royalty in the Arabian Peninsula, but to be fair I'm not sure how strict the Saudi family are about that now. There has never been any feudal connotation to the title and the leader of a Sanjak was a Bey not a Sheikh. You seem to be confusing Arab titles with Turkish ones.



But still no mention of Palestine by name
Yes, you are nuts. I agree. :D
...said the pot.

I am perfectly sane, unlike yourself. Anyone who supports terrorists are just as crazy as they are. That is the bottom line. If you support the use of terrorist tactics to accomplish a goal, then you are just as insane as the terrorist.

But but haven't you heard the news? You see, the noble peace loving, life loving Palestinians of Hamas & the PA are not terrorists, they're "freedom fighters." It's called Palestinian mentality. Heh Heh!

No, it's called rational human behaviour when threatened with occupation, oppression, humiliation and brutality on a daily basis. It's what the Polish AK, French FFI and Maquis, Legion Belge, Czech UVOD, Danish Freedom Council, Greek Democratic National Army and ELAS & EDES and many, many more resistance organisations did during WW2. All of them were called Terrorists by the Nazis.





And once again you ignore the Jews who have faced just that from the arab muslims for the last 1400 years. So what the Israeli's are doig according to you is "rational human behaviour"
:link:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom