Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hamas threatens rocket barrage at Tel Aviv if Israel strikes continue​


Oh, my. Islamic terrorists making threats.
Looks like Israel wants more rockets.
looks like your Islamic terrorist heroes want more beat down.






Israeli Ground Troops Attack Targets In Gaza​

PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Incitement to Violence
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I seem to be a bit confused.

Didn't this star in earnest when President Mahmoud Abbas calling to “defend Jerusalem with our lives” back in April.
“Fatah seeks to incite violence in Jerusalem,” by Itamar Marcus, Palestinian Media Watch, April 25, 2021

Isn't the current tension fueled by the HAMAS ULTIMATUM that threatened military action if all Israeli police didn't leave the al-Aqsa Mosque?
And was there not a barrage of over 100 rockets into Israel?
Is that not in direct opposition to the call for peace?

If the United State was on the receiving end of a rocket barrage from an external source, what would America do?
If Austin Texas was the target of 100 rockets from Cuba or Mexico, what would the American response be?

The International Community needs to put this hostile action - on the part of the Arab Palestinians - into context. Under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) (
Hague Regulation 1907) Israel is required to take all the measures to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety.

Israel has the inherent right of self-defense against armed attack as a Member of the United Nations (
Chapter VII, UN Charter). The UN Security Council already knows of the attack. And in the absence of decisive action on the part of the Security Council, Israel has the right to take such retaliatory action as may be necessary to neutralize the Hostile Arab Palestinian capability to continue the attack into the future. This defensive response on the part of Israel must be MINIMIZED in such duration and intensity only to the degree required to establish "a direct overall military advantage anticipated" at the conclusion of that measure of defensive response → required to forcefully induce the cessation of hostilities. This is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Rule pertaining to a "proportionality in the Attack" (Rule 14 IHL).
Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions said:
The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.
SOURCE:
Article 51 -- Protection of the civilian population

While the Current Rocket Attacks originating from the Hostile Arab Palestinians are a prohibited form of Indiscriminate attacks under the IHL Additional Protocol, the response by the Security Council has been totally incapable to address them.

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Quite a stark contrast. Israel will provide civilians an opportunity to leave those places used by Islamic terrorists to wage war before destroying them. Conversely, the Islamic terrorists wage war on civilians by the indiscriminate assault on cities.





PMW Exclusive: PA TV admits Israel warned civilians to leave building before attack​

Itamar Marcus | May 14, 2021
In this exclusive PMW video, an official Palestinian Authority source confirms the Israeli policy of warning Palestinian civilians to evacuate buildings that house terrorists and terror infrastructures in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, before they are destroyed. This has been a long held Israeli practice, even if it enables the terrorists to escape. Now an official Palestinian Authority source also confirms this.
A PA TV reporter recounts what he witnessed in Gaza:
warn2.png
 
Quite a stark contrast. Israel will provide civilians an opportunity to leave those places used by Islamic terrorists to wage war before destroying them. Conversely, the Islamic terrorists wage war on civilians by the indiscriminate assault on cities.





PMW Exclusive: PA TV admits Israel warned civilians to leave building before attack​

Itamar Marcus | May 14, 2021
In this exclusive PMW video, an official Palestinian Authority source confirms the Israeli policy of warning Palestinian civilians to evacuate buildings that house terrorists and terror infrastructures in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, before they are destroyed. This has been a long held Israeli practice, even if it enables the terrorists to escape. Now an official Palestinian Authority source also confirms this.
A PA TV reporter recounts what he witnessed in Gaza:
warn2.png
Could you imagine if Hamas had the weapons that Israel has ?
 
The IDF used a very effective diversionary tactic to isolate Islamic terrorists in tunnels and then initiated bombing runs.



The night of 1,000 bombs: Israel mounts deadly air attack against Gaza tunnels after decoy ground operation​

Shortly after midnight, the IDF said ground forces were 'attacking in Gaza' but the announcement was a ploy to send Hamas fighters into the tunnels where they were bombed
 
Times of Israel says that according to Al Jazeera, they were fired from near the Rashidiya Palestinian refugee camp in Tyre.

That does not appear to be true. That camp is some 22 km from the Israeli border and it seems unlikely that anyone in that tiny camp can build a rocket with that range.

Naharnet says that the rocket was fired from an area north of Naqoura, which is only a few kilimeters from Israel and much more likely.

The smaller rockets do seem to have been built in the Rashidiya camp, though. The Lebanese army found three rockets near that camp. They were small, similar to the original Qassam rockets from Hamas.



The Lebanese people are not likely to warm their already chilly feelings towards Palestinians if the "refugees" try to start a war with Israel from their territory.

And why do the Palestinians in camps in Lebanon need to build rockets, anyway? The only reason would be to try to start a war that Hezbollah would not be able to avoid joining; unless they think they need them for intra-faction fighting.

(full article online)

 
Three rockets were launched from Syria towards Israel on Friday evening amid a number of solidarity riots with the Palestinians amid ongoing escalations between Israel and Hamas, as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

One of the rockets failed to launch, falling on the Syrian side of the border. The other two rockets fell in an open space, leading to only open air sirens to be sounded. No injuries were recorded.

(full article online)

 
The Pally’s are going to need UNRWA to launch a major welfare-begging campaign to pay for the damages they brought on themselves.







Israeli air raid flattens Gaza building housing Al Jazeera: Live​

Protests in occupied West Bank and around world as number of people killed by Israeli bombardment on Gaza reaches 140.

Gaza tower housing AP, Al Jazeera is seen during a missile strike in Gaza city, May 15, 2021. [Mohammed Salem/Reuters]
 
Curious that the IDF announces in advance their intended targets.

I suppose the downside is that such announcements provide an opportunity for the Islamic terrorists to stage civilians in close proximity.




 
It really is a simple concept: throwing infidel welfare dollars at islsmic terrorists serves only to incentivize more acts of Islamic terrorism.



We urge the administration to not dishonor itself by doing the unconscionable: laundering our own tax dollars to the very terror networks responsible for promoting and rewarding the shedding of innocent blood, particularly that of our fellow citizens.
 
President Trump knew that funding Islamic terrorism in the form of money thrown at the Islamic terrorist syndicates in the West Bank and UNRWA was not in our interest.




The dire warnings of political and economic Armageddon in Palestinian-controlled territories did not come to pass when the Trump administration ended U.S. support for both entities. In the PA’s case, the American calculous was simple: end the policy of paying terrorists or the United States will cease providing aid. The PA chose the latter. For UNRWA, things were a bit more complicated since the UN already has a refugee agency, deeming UNRWA completely unnecessary.
 
The CEO of the Associated Press announces that they are “shocked and horrified that the Israeli military would target and destroy the building housing AP’s bureau and other news organizations in Gaza”.

He’s probably shocked and horrified that they’ve been found out, sharing premises with Hamas. I’m not shocked at all. The UN has been found to share keys with Hamas in the past and we know what journalists are like.

Note the warning the IDF gave. Note the time given to evacuate the building. Note the precision strike, at the base of the building, to bring it down. That’s not indiscriminate.


Posted in ATW
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top