RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,
No one knows what, (if anything) happened to the Ark of the Covenant (AoC). there is no record of it's true resting place since the cession of hostilities between the Israelites and the Babylonians, sometime between 590 BC and 580 BC. The First Temple in Jerusalem, originally completed around 960 BC, was completely destroyed at the conclusion of the conflict, and legend says that the Arc of the Covenant disappeared sometime during that conflict.
According to
Dennis Ross, Arafat denied that the Temple was in Jerusalem and said it was in Nablus.
The idea that ancient Jews lived in Yemen instead of Israel has popped up from
time to time, including on Palestinian TV.
It is of course not only ludicrous to think that the Israeli negotiators would say that Arafat must die for saying something absurd, but to think that they said it within earshot of the Palestinian negotiators is insanity.
But Arabs love their conspiracy theories.
(full article online)
PLO negotiator: "Arafat assassinated because he said Solomon's Temple was in Yemen" ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
(COMMENT)
Since no one knows what happened to the AoC; but some hypothesize that the Solomon's First Son, who's mother was the Queen of Sheba, went to visit his father
(King Solomon) in Jerusalem. One of many possible stories is that the Son
(Menelik), on his return to Sheba
(modern-day Yemen), brought the AoC with him. The location of the Capital of Sheba and the Queen's Palace (
Dungur) has been in dispute for centuries; with some saying the Palace was located at the site of the ruins of Aksum in Ethiopia, and others allege the Queen's Palace to be somewhere in the vicinity of Sanaa, Yemen. Still others in the chase, have put forth the idea that the AoC may yet be found in or around Kiryat Ye’arim, within the Palace of Telz-Stone, west of Jerusalem. The Palace of Telz-Stone site is believed to be the remains of a temple mentioned in the Book of Ezra.
The point being that
IF Yasar Arafat made such a statement, it would not be any less a possibility than any other of the theories.
Most Respectfully,
R