RE:
Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
ā»ā "JosĆ©,
et al,
Well, you tend to see only what you want to see.
The Allied Powers wrote all these guidelines you like to think extend some special privilege to the Arab Palestinians.
You cannot apply concepts of the 21st Century to common practice and understanding at the turn of the 19th Century into the very beginning of the 20th Century.
If you study history, you will notice that Imperialism (used as a propaganda term even up through today) was on the decline. At the end of the Great War (WWI) four great empires fell.
(COMMENT)
Against the "will of the natives" sends a totally bad interpretation. The Allied Powers set the stage for what was to become of the territories under the Mandate.
(COMMENT)
It was often considered counterproductive for the Arab Palestinians to be given the care of a minority sub-culture in the Middle East. And while it might have been a decision at risk by the Allied Powers that implemented the Mandate System, it was later proven that the Arab Palestinians were untrustworthy in any true political sense. Not long after the creation of the PLO , they uncovered their true colors:
The Conflict of 1970, Jordan History
The Jordanian civil war of September
1970, also known in the Arab world as Black September, was an attempt by the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the more radical Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine (PFLP) to topple Jordanian King Hussein and seize control of the country.
Jordan Premier Assassinated by Palestinian Extremist Group
Egyptian prosecutor Gen. Muhammad Maher Hassan said four men had been arrested. He said three belonged to an extremist Palestinian group called "the Black Hand of September." This is apparently a reference to the September, 1970, civil war in Jordan between Palestinian guerrillas and government troops.
Yes, yes, yes, The Americans are such bad people. And the Arab Palestinians have such clean hands.
The concept of Rights of Indigenous Peoples
(A/RES/61/295 SEP 2007) only gained marginal consensus in the first decade of the 21st Century; long after the wars have been fought and the decisions had been made.
So you recognize the fact that the british occupiers allowed the Zionists to create a totally separated society from the arab society, complete with a jewish press, jewish school system, farms, industries, banks, political institutions and leadership, proto-army, etc, etc...
The settlement of Jamestown and the future Colony of Virginia, were, respectively, a community and a society totally separated from the Algonquian and Iroquoian native societies that existed in Virginia.
(COMMENT)
Yes, that would be the
"millet system" of the Ottoman Empire.
Don't confuse the mission and purpose of Jamestown with anything relevant to today. Different standards applied.
The conflict instigated by the Mufti of Jerusalem
(Mohammed Amin al-Husseini) was all about power, shrouded in the cloak of nationalism. The Mufti was later to make a bid for power via the Egyptian financed "All Palestine Government.
(COMMENT)
There is nothing oblique about it.
Oh hell yes. But it was more then just the Mandate Power (Great Britain). The Jewish National Home was endorsed by the Principle Allied Powers (WWI era) and the Allied Command Europe (Allied Powers WWII).
In fact the UNSCOP made a two-state recommendation.
(COMMENT)
The Arab Palestinians declined to participate in the process. Not for the first time either. So it comes as no surprise that their preferences where less than prominent.
(COMMENT)
If you are talking about the economy on the territory over which the Israelis cover, you will notice that it did not collapse at all. In fact it is many time more prosperous that anything the Arabs have done in any of the 22 Member States.
As for the refugees, the UNRWA has made absolutely no attempt to provide the same placement services as the UN Refugee Agency.
(COMMENT)
It was a decision set with more input than not. The Arab State and the Jewish State were outlined in A/RES/181(II).
Most Respectfully,
R