Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[P F Tinmore]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

 

[gt1085]

Whose land? Who's the terrorists? Be specific.

If you don`t know then im not telling.the Israel thats there now,it not there birthright land,plain and simply.they are foreigners invaders,Stealing is what those fools do scumbags.

The thieves and invaders are the arab muslims who have 100's of 1,000,000's of deaths on their blood stained hands

One should take into consideration the history of the invasions, which date back to 610, when Muhammad had a religious experience on Mount Hira that changed his life. It's been going on for centuries.

Just the first of Mohammed's drug induced dreams.

Then there were the giveaways.

The Hashemites in Palestine: A Royal Scam That Keeps On Scamming

those are so-called white people

 

[gt1085]

Around 2,000 pilgrims from the Palestinian territories, Israel and Jordan, some waving Palestinian flags, attend the mass as well as Abbas, who had a private audience with the pope on Saturday.

How can the so-called "Evangelical Christians" support the Anti-Christian Zionists in their fight against Palestinians, be these Palestinians Christians or Muslims?

Its Their got dam land and not christians.Israel are the Terrorist.

Whose land? Who's the terrorists? Be specific.

If you don`t know then im not telling.the Israel thats there now,it not there birthright land,plain and simply.they are foreigners invaders,Stealing is what those fools do scumbags.

Yes and Those are Fake Arabs.European Implants.




The thieves and invaders are the arab muslims who have 100's of 1,000,000's of deaths on their blood stained hands

 

[Hollie]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Your continued whining about the self-inflicted pratfalls, poor decisions and overall incompetence and ineptitudes displayed by the Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is pointless.

It's quite clear that in the realm of decision making, taking appropriate action and the ability for some cultures to build vibrant societies, there are those who can and those (Arabs-Moslems, specifically) who can't.

The situation faced by Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is really no different than the various diseases afflicting the entirety of the Islamist Middle East. Whining as you do about your Islamist terrorist heroes in Gaza and the West Bank is little more than yammering that fails to address the retrogression and failed societies that define the Islamist Middle East.

 

[gt1085]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Your continued whining about the self-inflicted pratfalls, poor decisions and overall incompetence and ineptitudes displayed by the Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is pointless.

It's quite clear that in the realm of decision making, taking appropriate action and the ability for some cultures to build vibrant societies, there are those who can and those (Arabs-Moslems, specifically) who can't.

The situation faced by Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is really no different than the various diseases afflicting the entirety of the Islamist Middle East. Whining as you do about your Islamist terrorist heroes in Gaza and the West Bank is little more than yammering that fails to address the retrogression and failed societies that define the Islamist Middle East.

Good information.So what would we call these people who invaded
america and killed Millions,On Top Of Millions and so on.

 

[Phoenall]

Yes we know you are mentally deranged because you deny the Jews the same rights you demand for the Palestinians.

I have never denied the rights of the native Jews.

You have proved once again that you are nothing but hot air.

Then why wont you give the two year rule Jews the same rights you give the two year rule Palestinians. Your duck did not work as you are known to operate two sets of rules.

Just as we have never denied the rights of the pre 1920 arab muslim Palestinians, just the post 1920 illegal immigrant arab muslims.

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Your continued whining about the self-inflicted pratfalls, poor decisions and overall incompetence and ineptitudes displayed by the Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is pointless.

It's quite clear that in the realm of decision making, taking appropriate action and the ability for some cultures to build vibrant societies, there are those who can and those (Arabs-Moslems, specifically) who can't.

The situation faced by Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is really no different than the various diseases afflicting the entirety of the Islamist Middle East. Whining as you do about your Islamist terrorist heroes in Gaza and the West Bank is little more than yammering that fails to address the retrogression and failed societies that define the Islamist Middle East.

Good information.So what would we call these people who invaded
america and killed Millions,On Top Of Millions and so on.

Invading colonists of course, just as the arab muslims that invaded Samaria and Judea, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, India, Tunisia, Morocco and Turkey. Then we have the blacks who have invaded the Americas raping and pillaging as they go.

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Which seems to be the muslims at the moment getting 30 times more than the next top 4 put together. Over $7.5 billion to Afghanistan alone in monetary aid.

And that is how you view the Jews, as having no rights to anything

 

[Phoenall]

If you don`t know then im not telling.the Israel thats there now,it not there birthright land,plain and simply.they are foreigners invaders,Stealing is what those fools do scumbags.

The thieves and invaders are the arab muslims who have 100's of 1,000,000's of deaths on their blood stained hands

One should take into consideration the history of the invasions, which date back to 610, when Muhammad had a religious experience on Mount Hira that changed his life. It's been going on for centuries.

Just the first of Mohammed's drug induced dreams.

Then there were the giveaways.

The Hashemites in Palestine: A Royal Scam That Keeps On Scamming

those are so-called white people

No they are arab muslims as opposed to violent black afrocarribeans

 

[P F Tinmore]

I have never denied the rights of the native Jews.

You have proved once again that you are nothing but hot air.

Then why wont you give the two year rule Jews the same rights you give the two year rule Palestinians. Your duck did not work as you are known to operate two sets of rules.

Just as we have never denied the rights of the pre 1920 arab muslim Palestinians, just the post 1920 illegal immigrant arab muslims.

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

I have never seen "arab muslims" ever mentioned in international law.

 

[Phoenall]

Then why wont you give the two year rule Jews the same rights you give the two year rule Palestinians. Your duck did not work as you are known to operate two sets of rules.

Just as we have never denied the rights of the pre 1920 arab muslim Palestinians, just the post 1920 illegal immigrant arab muslims.

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

I have never seen "arab muslims" ever mentioned in international law.

DUCKING the question again, who mentioned arab muslims, and you have never read any International laws in reality.

When will you give answers to questions posed that will show your hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to the Jews ? But to make it easier for you it means the arab muslims that are the ones causing all the violence and trouble in Palestine.

 

[gt1085]

I have never denied the rights of the native Jews.

You have proved once again that you are nothing but hot air.

Then why wont you give the two year rule Jews the same rights you give the two year rule Palestinians. Your duck did not work as you are known to operate two sets of rules.

Just as we have never denied the rights of the pre 1920 arab muslim Palestinians, just the post 1920 illegal immigrant arab muslims.

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

No i`m not racist,hate the things or people that are,and their is plenty to go around.What makes you say im racist?

 

[gt1085]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Your continued whining about the self-inflicted pratfalls, poor decisions and overall incompetence and ineptitudes displayed by the Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is pointless.

It's quite clear that in the realm of decision making, taking appropriate action and the ability for some cultures to build vibrant societies, there are those who can and those (Arabs-Moslems, specifically) who can't.

The situation faced by Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is really no different than the various diseases afflicting the entirety of the Islamist Middle East. Whining as you do about your Islamist terrorist heroes in Gaza and the West Bank is little more than yammering that fails to address the retrogression and failed societies that define the Islamist Middle East.

Good information.So what would we call these people who invaded
america and killed Millions,On Top Of Millions and so on.

Invading colonists of course, just as the arab muslims that invaded Samaria and Judea, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, India, Tunisia, Morocco and Turkey. Then we have the blacks who have invaded the Americas raping and pillaging as they go.

If You Are Speaking About Blacks Here,You Are Lying,We Were Here Before Columbus And The Slave Trade.It Was The European Come Here Killing Over 12 Million Original People Of This Land.!@ Million Innocent People And The number Still Rises To This Very Hour,Innocent People Dying For No Reason Getting Murdered.

 

[gt1085]

et al,

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when. That has very little to do with it. Decisions were made. Apportionments were either awarded or given tacit approval. Investments were established. The same war was fought three time and is still not over.

The only contemporary questions that legitimately remains today are the question of:

• The West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
• The West Bank Settlements.
• The question of Jerusalem.
• The legitimacy and competency of the alleged State of Palestine. (Including the legitimacy of its government.)
​

But hashing and rehashing the League of Nations decisions made in the first two decades of the 20th Century, --- the Mid-Post War era by the United Nations, --- and the decisions relative to the three wars (1948, 1967, 1973) which were actually all the same war, --- is not going to solve much.

The Israelis are not going to be a party to its own nation-suicide by allowing hostile Arab Palestinians to flood inside its sovereignty.

It is not going to adopt or be a party to some sort of forced Arab Style, Treaty of Versailles like reparations, restitution, or monetary settlements that would bankrupt or serious strain the economy in favor of the failed entity of Palestine.

Israel is no going to allow the selfish policies of the radicalized Islamic extremist to claim control over all access to the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Remember, that Israel, given the violent history against its people and culture (and the Jihadist within the Arab League), exercising its national sovereignty will decides that extraordinary events, related to the Israeli-Palestinian Relations will not jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It will stand to protect and preserve the culture.

The solution rests in what will each side accept; for the sake of peace. But their are limitations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, it is not a matter of who had what rights when.​

It is a matter of who could mooch the most guns, money, and political support.

Rights be damned.

Your continued whining about the self-inflicted pratfalls, poor decisions and overall incompetence and ineptitudes displayed by the Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is pointless.

It's quite clear that in the realm of decision making, taking appropriate action and the ability for some cultures to build vibrant societies, there are those who can and those (Arabs-Moslems, specifically) who can't.

The situation faced by Arabs-Moslems occupying the disputed territories is really no different than the various diseases afflicting the entirety of the Islamist Middle East. Whining as you do about your Islamist terrorist heroes in Gaza and the West Bank is little more than yammering that fails to address the retrogression and failed societies that define the Islamist Middle East.

Their is No Differents For Arab Muslims,And White christian Where christian are the Champion Murders no will beat the caucasians Record of Innocent killings Already over 200 Million and were all Blacks .but Animals will be Animals and are born from Lemurs.

 

[gt1085]

The thieves and invaders are the arab muslims who have 100's of 1,000,000's of deaths on their blood stained hands

One should take into consideration the history of the invasions, which date back to 610, when Muhammad had a religious experience on Mount Hira that changed his life. It's been going on for centuries.

Just the first of Mohammed's drug induced dreams.

Then there were the giveaways.

The Hashemites in Palestine: A Royal Scam That Keeps On Scamming

those are so-called white people

No they are arab muslims as opposed to violent black afrocarribeans

No thier is only 1 violent people and the are so-called White people.Fact.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

I have never seen "arab muslims" ever mentioned in international law.

DUCKING the question again, who mentioned arab muslims, and you have never read any International laws in reality.

When will you give answers to questions posed that will show your hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to the Jews ? But to make it easier for you it means the arab muslims that are the ones causing all the violence and trouble in Palestine.

What do you mean by arab muslims and which Jews are you talking about?

 

[gt1085]

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

I have never seen "arab muslims" ever mentioned in international law.

DUCKING the question again, who mentioned arab muslims, and you have never read any International laws in reality.

When will you give answers to questions posed that will show your hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to the Jews ? But to make it easier for you it means the arab muslims that are the ones causing all the violence and trouble in Palestine.

What do you mean by arab muslims and which Jews are you talking about?

Don`t know what your commenting on.But todays arabs are fake they are not the Original,Jews their are a few white Jews,which means they practice that religion,jew-ish is a None people meaning Fake they are khazars.

 

[Phoenall]

Then why wont you give the two year rule Jews the same rights you give the two year rule Palestinians. Your duck did not work as you are known to operate two sets of rules.

Just as we have never denied the rights of the pre 1920 arab muslim Palestinians, just the post 1920 illegal immigrant arab muslims.

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

No i`m not racist,hate the things or people that are,and their is plenty to go around.What makes you say im racist?

Your terminology in your posts for starters that show you are favouring one group over the others. The way you attack the Jews is racist in the extreme.

 

[gt1085]

You are just bloviating again. You always misrepresent what I say.

No I am pinning you down to specifics to see just how far you will go to twist the truth.

Now can we start again with the same set of rules for both sides and see just what your views are.

The Jews and arab muslims that arrived after 1920 should be given the same rights in all matters TRUE or FALSE

The Jews lands bought under international law in the west bank should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslim lands in Israel bought under international law should be handed back to them TRUE or FALSE

The treaties formulated under international laws of the time should be enforced on the Jews and arab muslims TRUE or FALSE

The UN resolutions should not be used as International laws TRUE or FALSE

The arab muslims should be kicked out of the UN for their use of illegal weapons against the Jews contrary to the UN charter TRUE or FALSE

The granting of Palestine to the arab muslims east of the Jordan is the only land they can claim TRUE or FALSE

The granting of the land to the west of the Jordan is the only land that the Jews can claim TRUE or FALSE.

Dividing people into different groups is racist.

Like dividing pre 1920 Palestinians Jews from post 1920 Palestinian Jews ?

Something you are very proud of doing on here as it allegedly hides your racism.


Now how about answering the questions instead of ducking them, something else you are very good at

No i`m not racist,hate the things or people that are,and their is plenty to go around.What makes you say im racist?

Your terminology in your posts for starters that show you are favouring one group over the others. The way you attack the Jews is racist in the extreme.

No,Perhaps truth is being overlooked as it always is over looked unless dealing 1 particular people out of many.

 

[Shusha]

What makes you say im racist?

I would imagine it is your frequent use of racial terms to discuss human beings and groups of human beings. Typically in Western culture, people are not identified by their skin color but by their ethnic, cultural, social or national groups.