Who Are The Palestinians " III "

[Hollie]

Not my opinion.

Opinions don't change the facts.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I don't think that law has been repealed.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I don't want a quote. I want the entire agreement.

It is 9 pages. I don't think I can post it here.

 

[P F Tinmore]

View attachment 725271

Do you have a source for that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you have a source for that?

Palestinian Citizenship Order 1925 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinian Citizenship Order 1925 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There are some problems here. One is that anybody can write into wikipedia.

That said. The Mandate was following international law.

In international law, when a state is dissolved and new states are established, “the population follows the change of sovereignty in matters of nationality.”5 As a rule, therefore, citizens of the former state should automatically acquire the nationality of the successor state in which they had already been residing.

Nationality constitutes a legal bond that connects individuals with a specific territory, making them citizens of that territory. It is therefore imperative to examine the boundaries of Palestine in order to define the piece of land on which Palestinian nationality was established.

To "denationalize" Palestinians would violate international law.

The Mandate had no territory or sovereignty. It merely administered Palestine. Palestine existed after the Mandate handed Palestine over to the UN. There is nothing anywhere that says that the laws created on the behalf of Palestine would expire at the end of the Mandate The Mandate itself was temporary. Palestine was not.

 

[Hollie]

There are some problems here. One is that anybody can write into wikipedia.

That said. The Mandate was following international law.


To "denationalize" Palestinians would violate international law.

The Mandate had no territory or sovereignty. It merely administered Palestine. Palestine existed after the Mandate handed Palestine over to the UN. There is nothing anywhere that says that the laws created on the behalf of Palestine would expire at the end of the Mandate The Mandate itself was temporary. Palestine was not.

There are some problems here. There was no “denationalization”.

The Mandate for Palestine never “handed over” anything to the UN.

The Arab-Moslem occupation of the former Ottoman-Turk territory held no sovereignty.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There are some problems here. One is that anybody can write into wikipedia.

That said. The Mandate was following international law.


To "denationalize" Palestinians would violate international law.

The Mandate had no territory or sovereignty. It merely administered Palestine. Palestine existed after the Mandate handed Palestine over to the UN. There is nothing anywhere that says that the laws created on the behalf of Palestine would expire at the end of the Mandate The Mandate itself was temporary. Palestine was not.

There are some problems here. One is that anybody can write into wikipedia.

If you have a different, better source.....post it.

The Mandate had no territory or sovereignty. It merely administered Palestine.

But its citizenship order lasts forever? Weird

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There are some problems here. One is that anybody can write into wikipedia.

That said. The Mandate was following international law.


To "denationalize" Palestinians would violate international law.

The Mandate had no territory or sovereignty. It merely administered Palestine. Palestine existed after the Mandate handed Palestine over to the UN. There is nothing anywhere that says that the laws created on the behalf of Palestine would expire at the end of the Mandate The Mandate itself was temporary. Palestine was not.

To "denationalize" Palestinians would violate international law.

Jordan and Egypt did it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

There are some problems here. There was no “denationalization”.

The Mandate for Palestine never “handed over” anything to the UN.

The Arab-Moslem occupation of the former Ottoman-Turk territory held no sovereignty.

The Mandate for Palestine never “handed over” anything to the UN.

They did. RiccoR has posted the link several times.

The Arab-Moslem occupation of the former Ottoman-Turk territory held no sovereignty.

Link?

 

[Hollie]

They did. RiccoR has posted the link several times.

Link?

 

[Hollie]

Link?

Like most things, it’s been explained to you multiple times across multiple threads and you remain befuddled.

The land area you falsely represent as the Magical Kingdom of Pally’land was simply a Sanjak (administration area) of the Ottoman Turks.

Link? Look for the other dozen times this has been spelled out for you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Pally’land was simply a Sanjak (administration area) of the Ottoman Turks.

True until 1924. Then it was Palestine.

 

[Hollie]

True until 1924. Then it was Palestine.

No, it was not.

 

[P F Tinmore]

No, it was not.

Was not what?

 

[Hollie]

Was not what?

Correct.

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore said:

 

[Hollie]

I'm afraid Biden and the dems will want to offer the islamic terrorists more welfare money.

Will The Biden Admin Respond After Top Official In Terrorist-Linked Palestinian Group Called For ‘Defeat’ Of US?

Will The Biden Admin Respond After Top Official In Terrorist-Linked Palestinian Group Called For ‘Defeat’ Of US? Micaela Burrow on November 13, 2022

www.shorenewsnetwork.com

A top coordinator of a terrorist-linked pro-Palestinian organization threatened the U.S. and called for its “defeat,” but two weeks later the Biden administration has yet to respond.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Support the disposable Pally child soldiers.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

The Palestinian Authority's child soldier strategy against Israel - opinion



With the PA feeding Palestinian children a steady diet of child soldier promotion, when the PA launches its terror waves it has a cadre of children ready to be called to action.