I'm talking about when I was a kid and how kids settled their differences with duking it out. That was in the '70s.
As I said, it was different than what we're seing with this new generation of urban hoodlums.
Now they're literally trying to kill their opponents.
I remember once this kid kept talking crap to me in school all day. He wante to fight me on the playground after school.
I do not know why, to this day. I was a new student though. Maybe that was why. I dunno.
We were only around eight or nine.
But we just rassled around basically.
Unfortunately, my grandma saw it because for whatever reason she walked up to the school to walk me home.
I got my ass whipped nice and good when I got home for fighting, though. lol.
Tht;s back whe nwe had to go find our own switch, too.
It certainly was not something that was encouraged.
When about 14 white men would attack 1 black man, what was that called?
Well you're talking about adults here. And at a time when they were lynching people and hanging them from trees and burning them. I don't think that any reasonable person condones that.
Interestingly, though, the way you've kind of tried to flip the script here could very well be a part of why this new generation of urban hoodlums are not
discouraged from fighting in this way. And that's actually an interesting conversation in itself.
I suppose that there could be outliers in their upbringing that might more resemble some kind of taught/learned cause for retribution for something that their parents are angry about and that these youth more than likely do not even understand.
apnews.com
