White House inadvertently texted top-secret Yemen war plans to journalist

That's a fact.

Project 2025 also planned the Venezuela deportations knowing that a court order would be broken in the process.

The people who are telling Trump how to implement all this had it planned long ago.
Aweee your drugee buddies got deported.

:CryingCow::CryingCow::CryingCow:
 
Of course another scandal is that trumpy knew nothing about it. If he was telling the truth that is.
Since he is known to tell only the truth - then this scandal should suffice for an impeachment-hearing.
A country can't be exposed to a President who isn't informed - but running the country and wars. :eek:
 
1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345et: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”

I mean if I was the target I may decide to get out of the house for a bit. But that is just me.
Im not a simple minded peasant.

It rather makes yesterdays protestations rather hollow.
Is it possible that these people lied ? Is it just possible ?
Can you show me 1 just 1 single post you or a leftist ever posted complaining about news hosts/reporting saying a little to much info about ongoing conflicts when reporting their positions, their game plans, their weapons and incoming supplies, and ships,& their deployments (which even service members are not allowed to their loved ones) and other "too explicitely revealing" and helpful to the enemies and their hosts and the enemies sponsors & allies??
 
Yeah. The Clintons had Secret Service agents burning documents.
Feel free to show me a law, that

a). would forbid this "specific" kind of action
b). making such a "specific" order, illegal

And the prosecution, proofing which documents had been burned :auiqs.jpg:would be a real bummer.
The FBI destroying evidence.....
What evidence? - supposedly about what? Trump's shady business deals, and payoffs?
 
Awesome. Another thread on the same ******* subject.
Thanks.
Another thread seemingly that the Left gives a shit about National Security. Remember, you people want to return Tren de Argua and MS13 to US.
 
Feel free to show me a law, that

a). would forbid this "specific" kind of action
b). making such a "specific" order, illegal

And the prosecution, proofing which documents had been burned :auiqs.jpg:would be a real bummer.

What evidence? - supposedly about what? Trump's shady business deals, and payoffs?
Code of the District of Columbia

§ 22–723. Tampering with physical evidence; penalty.​


(a) A person commits the offense of tampering with physical evidence if, knowing or having reason to believe an official proceeding has begun or knowing that an official proceeding is likely to be instituted, that person alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, or removes a record, document, or other object, with intent to impair its integrity or its availability for use in the official proceeding.
 
On the chat? Yes. Was he invited? You made the claim, Do you have a link confirming he was invited? If no, then you lied
How the hell else you think he got on there? Explain how that reporter knew that Hegseth & the others were in on a group chat & how he knew that a military operation against the Houthis was about to begin, so he joined in the chat, UNINVITED.

Let's have it, genius.
 
Last edited:
I figured Republicans would blame the Atlantic on this

If you are going to discuss an air strike, find. sciff and verify who is on the chat
I already said they should punish those responsible. That's not the question here. The question is, if Goldberg copied information he suspected or found put later to be classified, is that not a legal issue?

Going further, when he knew it was classified he took and released that info to the public. Is that not a national security issue
How is it secret while it's going on? They are literally bombs going off, it's pretty loud

I agree with your second point, but nobody intended that he be on it, that's not who he was intending to share it with. Now if your claim is, that the SecDef intended to share the information, then what's the big deal? He certainly can, why are we even making this an issue?

Well, I don't know about that, if I am somehow included on a email or chat that I know I am not suppose to be on, I typically politely excuse myself, not take the info and run with it. Particularly, if I think that information could harm our national security. One has to think the reporter realized this real time info, wouldn't harm national security if he wrote about it, because it wasn't classified information

How is it secret while it's going on?


1743035056706.webp
 
15th post
OMGosh.

Boasbeg, the judge who is working to block Trump's deportations of criminal illegals...
1743035179838.webp


has been assigned to hear a lawsuit brought claiming that Waltz, Hegseth, and company officials violated the Federal Records Act by using Signal.

Smelling more and more like the Deep State is involved.

 
He showed more integrity than any of the Republicans
He remembered everything that was posted

um no...even if everything was true, aside from maintaining a presence in, retaining a disclosing classified information, his integrity is shit. Releasing this damages the united states in the eyes of the world. Regardless of if you like trump or not, what HE did was reckless. It eroded trust in the united states.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom